Communal Politics, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan (1906-1947)

Overview

The Muslim League's demand for a separate state of Pakistan was the political force that, alongside the freedom struggle, led to the partition of India in 1947. Founded in 1906, the League came to argue, through the two-nation theory, that Hindus and Muslims were two distinct nations. Encouraged by separate electorates and hardened by the failure of power-sharing, this idea culminated in the Lahore Resolution of 1940, the explicit demand for Pakistan. A parallel Hindu-nationalist politics grew on the other side, and the communal divide widened until partition seemed unavoidable.

Introduction: The Communal Divide and the Road to Partition

Why the Communal Divide Matters

Why this matters: the freedom struggle ended not in one free India but in two states. To understand 1947 we have to follow a second story running beside the national movement, the slow growth of a communal politics that turned religion into a basis for nationhood.

What is the significance of the communal divide: it produced the demand for Pakistan and, with it, the partition of the subcontinent. This part traces that demand from the founding of the Muslim League in 1906 to the eve of independence, treating it as a historical process with many causes rather than the work of any single villain.

The Geography of the Demand

Distinguishing the geography of the demand makes the rest clearer. The areas claimed for Pakistan lay in two blocs: a North-Western zone of Punjab, Sindh, the North-West Frontier Province and Baluchistan, and an Eastern zone of Bengal.

What the map shows is also the tragedy built into the demand: Punjab and Bengal held very large non-Muslim minorities, so these two provinces would themselves have to be partitioned in 1947, as set out below.

Map of the geography of the Pakistan demand: the Lahore Resolution of 1940 claimed the Muslim-majority areas of the North-Western zone, the Punjab, Sindh, the North-West Frontier Province and Baluchistan, and the Eastern zone of Bengal; the Punjab and Bengal, which held large non-Muslim minorities, were themselves partitioned in 1947, with Lahore and Dhaka going to Pakistan and Amritsar and Calcutta remaining in India.
Figure 1. The geography of the Pakistan demand.

The Rise of the Muslim League and the Roots of Separatism (1906-1916)

From the Simla Deputation to a Separate Party

What is the significance of the League's founding: it gave Muslim politics a separate organisation. It came soon after the 1905 partition of Bengal by Lord Curzon, which, though annulled in 1911, had already sharpened communal feeling. In October 1906 a deputation of Muslim leaders, the Simla Deputation, met the Viceroy Lord Minto to ask for separate political representation, and in December 1906 the All-India Muslim League was founded at Dacca.

Distinguishing its early character: the League began as a loyalist body of landlords and notables, with the Aga Khan as its first president, anxious to protect Muslim interests under British rule rather than to oppose it, as the milestones below record.

Table 1. Milestones in the hardening of the communal divide.
Year Development Effect on the divide
1906 Muslim League founded at Dacca A separate Muslim political platform
1909 Separate electorates (Morley-Minto) Communal representation written into law
1916 Lucknow Pact The Congress accepts separate electorates
1932 Communal Award Separate electorates widened (see Part 8)
1940 Lahore Resolution The explicit demand for Pakistan

Separate Electorates and Why They Mattered

Observable outcomes followed quickly. The Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909 granted Muslims separate electorates, by which Muslim voters elected Muslim members from reserved seats. This made religion a permanent category in representative politics, a step whose consequences ran right up to Partition.

Distinguishing the Congress response: in the Lucknow Pact of 1916, the Congress, then seeking Muslim co-operation, accepted separate electorates, and Syed Ameer Ali had already founded the London Muslim League in 1908. The principle of communal representation, once conceded, proved very hard to undo.

The Two-Nation Theory and the Lahore Resolution (1940)

Jinnah and the Claim of a Separate Nationhood

What is the significance of the two-nation theory: it recast a demand for safeguards as a demand for a separate nation. Its argument, set out below, was that Hindus and Muslims were not two communities within one nation but two distinct nations, by religion, culture, history and law.

Distinguishing the stages of the idea: the poet Muhammad Iqbal had spoken in 1930 of a consolidated Muslim state in the north-west, the name 'Pakistan' was coined by Choudhary Rahmat Ali in 1933, and after the Congress ministries of 1937 deepened Muslim fears, Jinnah made the two-nation theory the League's official creed, as the contrast below sets out.

Diagram contrasting the composite-nation view, that India was one nation of many faiths, with the two-nation theory, that Hindus and Muslims formed two distinct nations by religion, culture, history and law.
Figure 2. One nation, or two?

The Demand Declared at Minto Park

Observable outcomes came at Lahore. At the League's session at Minto Park on 23 March 1940, the Lahore Resolution, moved by A.K. Fazlul Huq, demanded that the Muslim-majority areas of the north-west and the east be grouped into independent states.

Distinguishing its terms: the resolution did not yet use the word Pakistan, but the press soon called it the Pakistan Resolution, and from 1940 the demand for a separate state was the League's central goal, as the list below records.

  • Muslim-majority areas in the North-Western and Eastern zones to be grouped into ‘independent states’.
  • The constituent units of those states to be autonomous and sovereign.
  • Adequate safeguards for the minorities within these areas.
  • Moved by A.K. Fazlul Huq at Minto Park, Lahore, on 23 March 1940.
  • Soon known as the Pakistan Resolution, though the word Pakistan did not appear in the text.

Hindu Mahasabha Politics and the Sangh

The Other Side: Hindutva and the Sangh

What is the significance of the Hindu-nationalist bodies: communal politics was never one-sided. Alongside the League grew a Hindu-nationalist politics, expressed through the Hindu Mahasabha and, from 1925, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

Distinguishing the two: the Hindu Mahasabha, which from the 1930s emerged as a distinct party under V.D. Savarkar, drew on his idea of Hindutva and, strikingly, advanced its own version of the two-nation idea; the RSS, founded by K.B. Hedgewar at Nagpur in 1925, built a cultural-nationalist volunteer movement, as the cards below set out.

Diagram of three communal organisations of the period: the All-India Muslim League founded in 1906, the Hindu Mahasabha founded in 1915, and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh founded in 1925.
Figure 3. The organisations of the communal divide.

Communal Tensions, Riots and the Hardening of Identities

Why the Two Communities Drew Apart in the 1940s

Observable outcomes in the 1940s were grim. As the League's demand grew, so did communal tension, with periodic riots, rival processions and a press on both sides that traded in fear, each community coming to see the other as a threat to its future.

Distinguishing the deeper causes: historians point to several at once, the long habit of separate electorates, the failure of the Congress and the League to share power after 1937, Muslim fears of permanent minority status, the rise of mass communal mobilisation, and a British readiness to treat the communities as separate blocs. No single cause explains the hardening; together they made compromise ever harder.

Significance: How the Demand for Pakistan Became Unstoppable

The Point of No Return for a United India

Contemporary linkages run from this divide straight to 1947. After the Lahore Resolution the League turned the demand for Pakistan into a mass movement, winning most Muslim seats in the elections of 1945 to 1946 and pressing its case by mass mobilisation, the events of 1946 that the next part takes up.

The larger significance is that, by the mid-1940s, the gap between a Congress committed to one India and a League committed to Pakistan had become almost unbridgeable. The communal divide, decades in the making, set the stage for the partition and independence of 1947, the subject of the next part.

Timeline of the rise of the Muslim League from its founding in 1906 and separate electorates in 1909 through the Lucknow Pact of 1916 and the 1937 election setback to the Lahore Resolution of 1940 and the mass mobilisation of 1946.
Figure 4. The rise of the League, 1906 to 1946.

Previous Year UPSC-CSE Questions

Previous Year UPSC-CSE Questions By the end you will be able to draft model answers for the following UPSC questions. Each question carries a collapsible framework showing how to approach it in the exam.

  1. UPSC Mains 2018 GS-I‘Communalism arises either due to power struggle or relative deprivation.’ Argue by giving suitable illustrations.
    How to structure the answer in the exam

    Directive verb: Argue · Approach: Take each cause in turn and illustrate it from the communal politics of 1906 to 1947, then weigh them.

    Introduction: Open by defining communalism as the political use of religious identity, then state the two proposed causes.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Power struggle: separate electorates (1909), the League's bid for power-sharing, the contest over the 1937 ministries.
    • Relative deprivation: Muslim fears of permanent minority status and of Hindu-majority domination.
    • Illustrations from both sides: the League and the Hindu Mahasabha or Sangh.
    • Synthesis: the two causes reinforced each other on the road to the Lahore Resolution and Partition.

    Conclusion: Conclude that both causes operated together, as the 1906-1947 record illustrates.

  2. UPSC Prelims 2012 GS Paper IThe Lahore Session of the Indian National Congress (1929) is very important in history, because:
    1. The Congress passed a resolution demanding complete independence.
    2. The rift between the extremists and moderates was resolved in that Session.
    3. A resolution was passed rejecting the two-nation theory in that Session.

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 2 and 3 only
    3. c 1 and 3 only
    4. d 1, 2 and 3
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multi-statement

    Approach: Test each statement against the date.

    Trap to watch: The two-nation theory dates from 1940, not 1929; the extremist-moderate rift was settled in 1916, not 1929; only the complete-independence resolution belongs to Lahore 1929.

    Key facts to recall:

    • Lahore 1929 = Purna Swaraj
    • Two-nation theory = Lahore Resolution 1940
    • Extremist-moderate reunion = 1916

    Answer signal: 1 only, so option (a).

  3. UPSC Prelims 2014 GS Paper IThe Partition of Bengal made by Lord Curzon in 1905 lasted until
    1. a the First World War when Indian leaders decided to support the British and demanded its annulment as a quid pro quo
    2. b King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911
    3. c Gandhiji launched his Civil Disobedience Movement
    4. d the Partition of India in 1947
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct

    Approach: Recall when the 1905 partition of Bengal was reversed.

    Trap to watch: The partition of Bengal was annulled in 1911 at the Delhi Durbar, not at independence in 1947.

    Key facts to recall:

    • Bengal partitioned 1905 (Curzon)
    • Annulled 1911 (Delhi Durbar, George V)
    • Fed Muslim and Hindu political mobilisation

    Answer signal: King George V in 1911, so option (b).

  4. UPSC Prelims 2001 GS Paper IA London branch of the All-India Muslim League was established in 1908 under the presidency of
    1. a Agha Khan
    2. b Ameer Ali
    3. c Liaquat Ali Khan
    4. d M. A. Jinnah
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct

    Approach: Separate the London branch from the main League.

    Trap to watch: The Aga Khan was the first president of the League itself; the London branch of 1908 was under Syed Ameer Ali.

    Key facts to recall:

    • League founded 1906 (Dacca)
    • London branch 1908 = Ameer Ali
    • Aga Khan = first president of the League

    Answer signal: Ameer Ali, so option (b).

Sources and Further Reading

Editorial Disclaimer

This article is prepared for UPSC examination preparation. Verify key facts and interpretations against standard reference histories before relying on them.

More on the Gandhian Era

Read next The Partition of India: From Wavell to the Radcliffe Line (1945-1947)
All articles on the Gandhian Era