Overview

Previous Year UPSC-CSE Questions By the end you will be able to draft model answers for the following UPSC questions. Each question carries a collapsible framework showing how to approach it in the exam.

  1. UPSC Mains 2018 GS-I‘Communalism arises either due to power struggle or relative deprivation.’ Argue by giving suitable illustrations.
    How to structure the answer in the exam

    Directive verb: Argue · Approach: Take each cause in turn and illustrate it from the communal politics of 1906 to 1947, then weigh them.

    Introduction: Open by defining communalism as the political use of religious identity, then state the two proposed causes.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Power struggle: separate electorates (1909), the League's bid for power-sharing, the contest over the 1937 ministries.
    • Relative deprivation: Muslim fears of permanent minority status and of Hindu-majority domination.
    • Illustrations from both sides: the League and the Hindu Mahasabha or Sangh.
    • Synthesis: the two causes reinforced each other on the road to the Lahore Resolution and Partition.

    Conclusion: Conclude that both causes operated together, as the 1906-1947 record illustrates.

  2. UPSC Prelims 2012 GS Paper IThe Lahore Session of the Indian National Congress (1929) is very important in history, because:
    1. The Congress passed a resolution demanding complete independence.
    2. The rift between the extremists and moderates was resolved in that Session.
    3. A resolution was passed rejecting the two-nation theory in that Session.

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 2 and 3 only
    3. c 1 and 3 only
    4. d 1, 2 and 3
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multi-statement

    Approach: Test each statement against the date.

    Trap to watch: The two-nation theory dates from 1940, not 1929; the extremist-moderate rift was settled in 1916, not 1929; only the complete-independence resolution belongs to Lahore 1929.

    Key facts to recall:

    • Lahore 1929 = Purna Swaraj
    • Two-nation theory = Lahore Resolution 1940
    • Extremist-moderate reunion = 1916

    Answer signal: 1 only, so option (a).

  3. UPSC Prelims 2014 GS Paper IThe Partition of Bengal made by Lord Curzon in 1905 lasted until
    1. a the First World War when Indian leaders decided to support the British and demanded its annulment as a quid pro quo
    2. b King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911
    3. c Gandhiji launched his Civil Disobedience Movement
    4. d the Partition of India in 1947
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct

    Approach: Recall when the 1905 partition of Bengal was reversed.

    Trap to watch: The partition of Bengal was annulled in 1911 at the Delhi Durbar, not at independence in 1947.

    Key facts to recall:

    • Bengal partitioned 1905 (Curzon)
    • Annulled 1911 (Delhi Durbar, George V)
    • Fed Muslim and Hindu political mobilisation

    Answer signal: King George V in 1911, so option (b).

  4. UPSC Prelims 2001 GS Paper IA London branch of the All-India Muslim League was established in 1908 under the presidency of
    1. a Agha Khan
    2. b Ameer Ali
    3. c Liaquat Ali Khan
    4. d M. A. Jinnah
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct

    Approach: Separate the London branch from the main League.

    Trap to watch: The Aga Khan was the first president of the League itself; the London branch of 1908 was under Syed Ameer Ali.

    Key facts to recall:

    • League founded 1906 (Dacca)
    • London branch 1908 = Ameer Ali
    • Aga Khan = first president of the League

    Answer signal: Ameer Ali, so option (b).

The Muslim League's demand for a separate state of Pakistan was the political force that, alongside the freedom struggle, led to the partition of India in 1947. Founded in 1906, the League came to argue, through the two-nation theory, that Hindus and Muslims were two distinct nations. Encouraged by separate electorates and hardened by the failure of power-sharing, this idea culminated in the Lahore Resolution of 1940, the explicit demand for Pakistan. A parallel Hindu-nationalist politics grew on the other side, and the communal divide widened until partition seemed unavoidable.

Introduction: The Communal Divide and the Road to Partition

Why the Communal Divide Matters

Why this matters: the freedom struggle ended not in one free India but in two states. To understand 1947 we have to follow a second story running beside the national movement, the slow growth of a communal politics that turned religion into a basis for nationhood.

What is the significance of the communal divide: it produced the demand for Pakistan and, with it, the partition of the subcontinent. This part traces that demand from the founding of the Muslim League in 1906 to the eve of independence, treating it as a historical process with many causes rather than the work of any single villain.

The Geography of the Demand

Distinguishing the geography of the demand makes the rest clearer. The areas claimed for Pakistan lay in two blocs: a North-Western zone of Punjab, Sindh, the North-West Frontier Province and Baluchistan, and an Eastern zone of Bengal.

What the map shows is also the tragedy built into the demand: Punjab and Bengal held very large non-Muslim minorities, so these two provinces would themselves have to be partitioned in 1947, as set out below.

The Geography of the Pakistan DemandThe zones claimed by the Lahore Resolution of 1940, and the provinces it would splitBAY OF BENGALNorth-WesternZoneEasternZoneLahore (1940)Dhaka (1906)AmritsarCalcuttaWhat the Lahore Resolution claimedThe zones claimed for Pakistan (1940)The North-Western zone (Punjab, Sindh, the NWFP, Baluchistan)and the Eastern zone (Bengal)The provinces partitioned in 1947Punjab and Bengal, with large non-Muslim minorities, weredivided: Lahore and Dhaka to Pakistan, Amritsar and Calcutta toIndiaThe claimed zones lay mostly in what became Pakistan and, in the east, Bangladesh.Copyright (c) 2026 Digitally Learn. All Rights Reserved.
Figure 1. The geography of the Pakistan demand.

The Rise of the Muslim League and the Roots of Separatism (1906-1916)

From the Simla Deputation to a Separate Party

What is the significance of the League's founding: it gave Muslim politics a separate organisation. It came soon after the 1905 partition of Bengal by Lord Curzon, which, though annulled in 1911, had already sharpened communal feeling. In October 1906 a deputation of Muslim leaders, the Simla Deputation, met the Viceroy Lord Minto to ask for separate political representation, and in December 1906 the All-India Muslim League was founded at Dacca.

Distinguishing its early character: the League began as a loyalist body of landlords and notables, with the Aga Khan as its first president, anxious to protect Muslim interests under British rule rather than to oppose it, as the milestones below record.

Table 1. Milestones in the hardening of the communal divide.
Year Development Effect on the divide
1906 Muslim League founded at Dacca A separate Muslim political platform
1909 Separate electorates (Morley-Minto) Communal representation written into law
1916 Lucknow Pact The Congress accepts separate electorates
1932 Communal Award Separate electorates widened (see Part 8)
1940 Lahore Resolution The explicit demand for Pakistan

Separate Electorates and Why They Mattered

Observable outcomes followed quickly. The Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909 granted Muslims separate electorates, by which Muslim voters elected Muslim members from reserved seats. This made religion a permanent category in representative politics, a step whose consequences ran right up to Partition.

Distinguishing the Congress response: in the Lucknow Pact of 1916, the Congress, then seeking Muslim co-operation, accepted separate electorates, and Syed Ameer Ali had already founded the London Muslim League in 1908. The principle of communal representation, once conceded, proved very hard to undo.

The Two-Nation Theory and the Lahore Resolution (1940)

Jinnah and the Claim of a Separate Nationhood

What is the significance of the two-nation theory: it recast a demand for safeguards as a demand for a separate nation. Its argument, set out below, was that Hindus and Muslims were not two communities within one nation but two distinct nations, by religion, culture, history and law.

Distinguishing the stages of the idea: the poet Muhammad Iqbal had spoken in 1930 of a consolidated Muslim state in the north-west, the name 'Pakistan' was coined by Choudhary Rahmat Ali in 1933, and after the Congress ministries of 1937 deepened Muslim fears, Jinnah made the two-nation theory the League's official creed, as the contrast below sets out.

One Nation, or Two?The competing ideas of nationhood that divided Indian politicsThe composite-nation viewThe CongressIndia is one nationOf many faiths togetherCitizenship, not religionA secular, shared stateUnity in diversityThe two-nation theoryThe Muslim LeagueHindus and Muslims aretwo distinct nationsSeparate by religion,culture, history and lawEach needs its own stateThe clash of these two ideas of the nation lay at the heart of the road to Partition.
Figure 2. One nation, or two?

The Demand Declared at Minto Park

Observable outcomes came at Lahore. At the League's session at Minto Park on 23 March 1940, the Lahore Resolution, moved by A.K. Fazlul Huq, demanded that the Muslim-majority areas of the north-west and the east be grouped into independent states.

Distinguishing its terms: the resolution did not yet use the word Pakistan, but the press soon called it the Pakistan Resolution, and from 1940 the demand for a separate state was the League's central goal, as the list below records.

  • Muslim-majority areas in the North-Western and Eastern zones to be grouped into ‘independent states’.
  • The constituent units of those states to be autonomous and sovereign.
  • Adequate safeguards for the minorities within these areas.
  • Moved by A.K. Fazlul Huq at Minto Park, Lahore, on 23 March 1940.
  • Soon known as the Pakistan Resolution, though the word Pakistan did not appear in the text.

Hindu Mahasabha Politics and the Sangh

The Other Side: Hindutva and the Sangh

What is the significance of the Hindu-nationalist bodies: communal politics was never one-sided. Alongside the League grew a Hindu-nationalist politics, expressed through the Hindu Mahasabha and, from 1925, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

Distinguishing the two: the Hindu Mahasabha, which from the 1930s emerged as a distinct party under V.D. Savarkar, drew on his idea of Hindutva and, strikingly, advanced its own version of the two-nation idea; the RSS, founded by K.B. Hedgewar at Nagpur in 1925, built a cultural-nationalist volunteer movement, as the cards below set out.

The Organisations of the Communal DivideThe main bodies that shaped a politics of religious identityMuslim League1906, DaccaA separate politicalvoice for Muslims;later the demandfor PakistanHindu Mahasabha1915A Hindu-nationalistbody; Savarkar’sHindutva; its owntwo-nation viewThe Sangh (RSS)1925, NagpurA cultural-nationalistvolunteer bodyfounded byK. B. HedgewarPolitics organised around religious identity grew on both sides through these decades.
Figure 3. The organisations of the communal divide.

Communal Tensions, Riots and the Hardening of Identities

Why the Two Communities Drew Apart in the 1940s

Observable outcomes in the 1940s were grim. As the League's demand grew, so did communal tension, with periodic riots, rival processions and a press on both sides that traded in fear, each community coming to see the other as a threat to its future.

Distinguishing the deeper causes: historians point to several at once, the long habit of separate electorates, the failure of the Congress and the League to share power after 1937, Muslim fears of permanent minority status, the rise of mass communal mobilisation, and a British readiness to treat the communities as separate blocs. No single cause explains the hardening; together they made compromise ever harder.

Significance: How the Demand for Pakistan Became Unstoppable

The Point of No Return for a United India

Contemporary linkages run from this divide straight to 1947. After the Lahore Resolution the League turned the demand for Pakistan into a mass movement, winning most Muslim seats in the elections of 1945 to 1946 and pressing its case by mass mobilisation, the events of 1946 that the next part takes up.

The larger significance is that, by the mid-1940s, the gap between a Congress committed to one India and a League committed to Pakistan had become almost unbridgeable. The communal divide, decades in the making, set the stage for the partition and independence of 1947, the subject of the next part.

The Rise of the League, 1906 to 1946From a small elite body to the voice of a Pakistan demand1906League foundedDacca; a separate platform1909Separate electoratesMorley-Minto Reforms1916Lucknow PactCongress accepts theprinciple1937Election setbackThe League fares poorly1940Lahore ResolutionThe demand for Pakistan1946Mass mobilisationA mass demand; see Part 16In forty years the League moved from a narrow elite body to the architect of Partition.
Figure 4. The rise of the League, 1906 to 1946.

Prelims MCQ practice

Each question below tests one specific concept on the topic. Click to reveal the answer and a full option-wise explanation.

Q1. The All-India Muslim League was founded in 1906 at:

  1. Lahore
  2. Dacca
  3. Aligarh
  4. Lucknow
Show answer and explanation

Answer: Dacca

Explanation.

Option (b) is correct. The All-India Muslim League was founded at Dacca in December 1906. Hence option (b).

Q2. Separate electorates for Muslims were first granted by the:

  1. Indian Councils Act 1892
  2. Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909
  3. Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919
  4. Government of India Act 1935
Show answer and explanation

Answer: Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909

Explanation.

Option (b) is correct. Separate electorates for Muslims were introduced by the Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act) of 1909. Hence option (b).

Q3. The Lahore Resolution of the Muslim League was passed in:

  1. 1930
  2. 1937
  3. 1940
  4. 1946
Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1940

Explanation.

Option (c) is correct. The Lahore Resolution, later called the Pakistan Resolution, was passed on 23 March 1940. Hence option (c).

Q4. Consider the following statements about the Lahore Resolution of 1940:

  1. It was moved by A.K. Fazlul Huq.
  2. It used the word 'Pakistan' in its text.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1 only

Explanation.

Only statement 1 is correct. The resolution was moved by A.K. Fazlul Huq but did not use the word 'Pakistan'; the press later called it the Pakistan Resolution. Hence option (a).

Q5. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) was founded in 1925 at:

  1. Pune
  2. Nagpur
  3. Wardha
  4. Delhi
Show answer and explanation

Answer: Nagpur

Explanation.

Option (b) is correct. The RSS was founded by K.B. Hedgewar at Nagpur in 1925. Hence option (b).

Q6. Consider the following statements about communal politics before 1947:

  1. The Lucknow Pact of 1916 saw the Congress accept separate electorates.
  2. The two-nation theory became the Muslim League's official position only in 1940.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer and explanation

Answer: Both 1 and 2

Explanation.

Both are correct. The Congress accepted separate electorates in the Lucknow Pact of 1916, and the two-nation theory became the League's creed with the Lahore Resolution of 1940. Hence option (c).

Sources and Further Reading

Editorial Disclaimer

This article is prepared for UPSC examination preparation. Verify key facts and interpretations against standard reference histories before relying on them.

Part 15 of 21 · The Gandhian Era

All 21 parts in this cluster
  1. 1 Part 1: Gandhi Before the Mass Movement: South Africa, Satyagraha and the Gandhian Creed
  2. 2 Part 2: The Early Experiments: Champaran, Ahmedabad and Kheda (1917-1918)
  3. 3 Part 3: Rowlatt, Jallianwala Bagh and the Khilafat Question (1919-1920)
  4. 4 Part 4: The Non-Cooperation Movement: Programme, Spread and Chauri Chaura (1920-1922)
  5. 5 Part 5: The Swaraj Party and the Council-Entry Years (1922-1928)
  6. 6 Part 6: The Simon Commission, the Nehru Report and the Communal Fault-line (1927-1929)
  7. 7 Part 7: Purna Swaraj and the Salt Satyagraha: Civil Disobedience Phase I (1929-1931)
  8. 8 Part 8: The Round Table Conferences, the Poona Pact and Civil Disobedience Phase II (1931-1934)
  9. 9 Part 9: Revolutionary Nationalism in the 1920s-30s: HSRA, Bhagat Singh and Chittagong (1924-1934)
  10. 10 Part 10: The Government of India Act 1935
  11. 11 Part 11: Provincial Autonomy: The 1937 Elections and the Congress Ministries (1937-1939)
  12. 12 Part 12: The Second World War, the Failed Missions and Individual Satyagraha (1939-1944)
  13. 13 Part 13: The Quit India Movement (1942)
  14. 14 Part 14: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National Army (1939-1945)
  15. 15 Part 15: Communal Politics and the Demand for Pakistan (1906-1947) (this article)
  16. 16 Part 16: Partition and Independence: From Wavell to the Radcliffe Line (1945-1947)
  17. 17 Part 17: The Integration of the Princely States (1947-1948)
  18. 18 Part 18: Gandhi and Social Reform: Caste, Untouchability and the Poona Pact
  19. 19 Part 19: The Constructive Programme and Gandhian Economic Thought
  20. 20 Part 20: Many Voices: Peasants, Tribals, Workers and Women in the Freedom Struggle
  21. 21 Part 21: The Gandhian Era: Historiography, Analysis and the Verdict