Overview

The partition of Bengal in 1905 was Lord Curzon's division of the Bengal Presidency into two provinces, in force from 16 October 1905. The government called it an administrative reform. Indians saw a plan to weaken Bengal, which was then the nerve centre of the nationalist movement. The protest that followed became the Swadeshi movement, which boycotted British goods and institutions and built Indian ones in their place, and the partition was annulled in 1911.

Partition of Bengal 1905: Curzon's Plan and the Two Provinces

Timeline of the Partition: From the 1903 Plan to 16 October 1905

The Swadeshi movement was the campaign that grew out of the protest against the partition of Bengal. It had two halves. Boycott meant refusing British cloth, salt, schools and courts. Swadeshi in the narrow sense meant making and using Indian goods and building Indian schools, mills, banks and ships. The word joins two Sanskrit words, swa, own, and desh, country, and means of one's own country. Mahatma Gandhi later called swadeshi the soul of swaraj.

The story runs in five stages.

  1. December 1903 to July 1905: The plan is made public and the Moderates answer it with petitions and meetings.
  2. August to October 1905: The Town Hall resolution launches the movement and the partition comes into force.
  3. 1905 to 1907: The movement widens into a programme of boycott, national education and enterprise, and the Congress adopts four objectives at Calcutta.
  4. December 1907 to 1908: The Congress splits at Surat, the government represses the movement, and part of the youth turns to revolutionary action.
  5. 1908 to 1911: The open movement fades and the partition is annulled at the Delhi Durbar.

Eastern Bengal and Assam: How the Province Was Cut

The Bengal Presidency that Curzon divided was the largest in British India. In those days it extended over regions that now lie in Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha as well as West Bengal and Bangladesh.

Curzon's plan joined 15 eastern districts of Bengal with Assam to form a new province, Eastern Bengal and Assam. With Assam added, it held about 31 million people, most of them Muslim, which is why the two new provinces together held more than the 78 million of the old Bengal. Its centre was Dacca, the former Mughal capital of Bengal. Sir Bampfylde Fuller was its first Lieutenant Governor, and Eastern Bengal and Assam lasted from 1905 to 1912.

The western districts were joined with Bihar and Orissa to make the other province, which kept the name of Bengal.

Table 1. The two provinces of 1905
Feature Reduced Bengal (with Bihar and Orissa) Eastern Bengal and Assam
Population 54 million 31 million
Language make-up 17 million Bengali speakers, 37 million Hindi and Oriya speakers About 27 million Bengalis in 1901, with Assamese and hill communities
Religion Hindu majority, 42 million of 54 million Muslim majority, 18 million of 31 million

Causes of the Partition of Bengal: Administration or Divide and Rule

The Official Case: Governing a Province of 78 Million

The official case rested on administration. For decades officials had said that the huge province was hard to govern and that its poorer eastern region was neglected. The government had seen the need for a separate administration for the east as early as 1868, and by 1903 it also saw a chance to develop Assam commercially, with promises of more investment in education and jobs in the new province.

The case was not baseless. A province of 78 million people was a heavy load for one government in Calcutta. The question was whether the particular line drawn by Curzon was needed to solve it.

Real Motives: Weakening Bengal, Dividing Bengalis, Courting Muslims

The real motive, as nationalists read it, was to weaken Bengal, the nerve centre of Indian nationalism, by putting Bengalis under two administrations. The plan did not simply remove the Hindi and Oriya areas to shrink the province; it kept them in the reduced Bengal. Risley, the Home Secretary to the Government of India in 1904, stated the aim openly: "Bengal united is a power. Bengal divided will pull in several different ways. One of our main objects is to split up and thereby to weaken a solid body of opponents to our rule."

Three divisions were built into the plan.

  • By language: Bengali speakers became a minority in the reduced Bengal, outnumbered more than two to one by Hindi and Oriya speakers.
  • By religion: The western half had a Hindu majority and the eastern half a Muslim majority, so a single nationalist public was split along a religious line.
  • By courting the east: On a tour of east Bengal in 1904, Curzon argued that Dacca could be the capital of a Muslim-majority province that would give Muslims a unity they had not known since the days of the old Muslim viceroys and kings.

The English-educated middle class of Bengal, the bhadralok, saw the plan as a vivisection of their motherland and a way to reduce their influence, and the merchants of Calcutta feared losing their economic hold on the eastern districts. The government declared the partition a settled fact, but it was unsettled in 1911.

Anti-Partition Agitation: From Petitions to the Swadeshi Movement

Launch of the Swadeshi Movement: 7 August 1905 at the Calcutta Town Hall

The first answer to the partition plan followed the old method. Leaders such as Surendranath Banerjee, K.K. Mitra and Prithwishchandra Ray used petitions to the government, public meetings, memoranda and propaganda in pamphlets and newspapers such as Hitabadi, Sanjibani and Bengalee. They hoped that an educated public opinion in India and England would stop the partition.

Protest meetings were held within days of the July 1905 announcement in small towns all over Bengal, and it was at these meetings that the pledge to boycott foreign goods was first taken. Petitions were collected too, but the authorities did not move. Banerjee admitted that the petitions had failed, and as the date drew near he began to urge tougher steps such as boycotting British goods. He preferred to call this swadeshi rather than boycott. K.K. Mitra's Sanjibani had already called openly for a boycott of foreign goods on 13 July 1905.

The Swadeshi movement was formally started at the Calcutta Town Hall on 7 August 1905, when a massive meeting passed the Boycott Resolution. After the meeting the leaders dispersed to other parts of Bengal to carry the message of boycott, which meant refusing Manchester cloth and Liverpool salt. The date is still marked: India observes 7 August as National Handloom Day, first held on 7 August 2015.

16 October 1905: Partition Day, Rakhi and Amar Sonar Bangla

The day the partition came into force was observed as a day of mourning throughout Bengal. People fasted, bathed in the Ganga and walked barefoot in processions singing Vande Mataram, which almost spontaneously became the theme song of the movement. Surendranath Banerjee and Ananda Mohan Bose addressed huge gatherings, and 50,000 rupees were raised for the movement at one of these gatherings within a few hours.

The day also fell on Raksha Bandhan. People tied rakhis on each other's wrists as a symbol of unity between Hindus and Muslims and between the two halves of Bengal, and Rabindranath Tagore asked everyone to tie rakhi, especially to Muslims. On the same day the Mohammedan Provincial Union was founded, with Nawab Khwaja Salimullah of Dacca as its patron, which shows how differently the day was read by Hindus and by Muslims.

Songs carried the protest as much as meetings did. Tagore's Amar Sonar Bangla, an ode to Mother Bengal, is linked with these months. The year of its composition is not certain, since the original manuscript was never found, but its lyrics first appeared in September 1905, and it was adopted as the national anthem by the Provisional Government of Bangladesh in 1971.

Timeline from 1903 to 1912. December 1903: The partition plan made public. 7 August 1905: The boycott resolution at the Calcutta Town Hall. 16 October 1905: The partition takes effect. December 1906: The Calcutta session adopts four objectives. December 1907: The Surat split. 1909: Separate electorates. 12 December 1911: The partition annulled at the Delhi Durbar. The movement was at its height from 1905 to 1908

Programme of the Swadeshi Movement: Boycott, Enterprise, Education and Organisation

Boycott of Foreign Goods, Schools and Courts

The Swadeshi movement was not one tactic but a set of linked forms of struggle. Boycott refused what Britain sold and the institutions it ran. Swadeshi enterprise and national education built Indian replacements. Samitis, festivals and the stress on self-reliance carried the message to ordinary people, and songs, paintings and symbols gave it an emotional language.

Four cards. Refuse: Foreign cloth and salt, government schools, courts and councils, and passive resistance. Build: Indian mills and banks, the shipping company at Tuticorin of 1906 and the National Council of Education. Organise: Samitis, festivals and melas, folk theatre, and atma shakti or self-reliance. Express: Vande Mataram, Bharat Mata of 1905, the Swadeshi flag and the Bengal School

The boycott began with cloth, salt and sugar. Foreign cloth was burnt in public bonfires, priests refused to solemnise marriages in which foreign goods were exchanged, and washermen refused to wash foreign clothes. Wearing cloth spun and woven in India became a symbol of self-reliance and national pride. This form of protest met with great success at the practical and popular level.

The boycott then went further and aimed at British institutions, including government schools, colleges and courts. Its impact there was limited, because India's own institutions were not ready to offer a transition. When the Extremists took a larger part in the movement after 1905, they added a call for passive resistance, meaning a boycott of government schools and colleges, government service, courts, legislative councils, municipalities and government titles. Aurobindo put the aim as making the administration under present conditions impossible by an organised refusal to do anything that would help British commerce in exploiting the country or British officialdom in administering it.

Swadeshi Enterprise: Mills, Banks and the Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company

The idea of self-reliance was older than the partition. In 1886 the industrialist Jamsetji Tata set up the Swadeshi Mills in Bombay, Indian businessmen started the Punjab National Bank in Lahore in 1895 with Indian capital, and in 1901 the chemist Prafulla Chandra Ray founded Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals. After 1905 the spirit spread to textile mills, soap and match factories, tanneries, banks, insurance companies and shops. These ventures rested more on patriotic zeal than on business sense.

The movement encouraged people to promote Indian-made products, which strengthened India's own industries and reduced economic dependence on British goods, especially textiles. As it gathered force, nationalists mobilised people to boycott foreign cloth, and Indian mills shifted from yarn to cloth. Production of cotton piece-goods in India doubled between 1900 and 1912.

The boldest venture was at sea. V.O. Chidambaram Pillai, a pleader of Tuticorin, registered the Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company in October 1906 with a capital of ten lakh rupees, to break the monopoly of the British India Steam Navigation Company. It launched the first indigenous Indian shipping service, between Tuticorin and Colombo.

  • SS Galia: The company's first ship was bought from France with the help of Tilak and Aurobindo Ghose, reached Tuticorin on 1 June 1907 and flew a flag carrying the slogan Vande Mataram.
  • The fare war: When the British company cut its fare to one rupee, Pillai cut his to eight annas, half a rupee, and traders and passengers stayed with his ships out of nationalist feeling.
  • Suppression: The British company, helped by the government, denied the Indian ships berths and schedules in the port. Pillai was arrested on 12 March 1908 for sedition and sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment, and the company was liquidated in 1911.
  • Remembered: Tuticorin Port was renamed after him as the V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust.

The Swadeshi spirit also reached the factory floor. In February 1908 workers of the Coral Mill at Tuticorin struck after a speech by Pillai, and the nine-day strike won higher wages, shorter hours and Sunday leave.

National Education: National Council of Education and Bengal National College

Education became a front because nationalists saw the colleges as training servants for the Raj. They called Calcutta University Goldighir Ghulamkhana, the slave-house by the lake. Curzon's Indian Universities Act of 1904 was read as an attempt to limit Indians' access to English education, and the government also disaffiliated private Indian colleges that it regarded as hotbeds of nationalist agitation. Since 1902 Satish Chandra Mukherjee's Dawn Society had called for national education with an emphasis on the sciences.

The partition gave the push. On 9 November 1905 Subodh Chandra Mullick pledged one lakh rupees for a national university, and the idea of a National Council of Education was taken up at a meeting at Park Street on 10 December 1905. The Council was set up on 15 August 1906, and Rashbehari Ghosh was appointed its first president. Its object was to organise education, literary, scientific and technical, on national lines and under national control, with Indian languages as the medium of teaching.

  • Bengal National College: Set up by the Council in 1906, with Aurobindo Ghose as its first principal.
  • Bengal Technical Institute: Founded on 25 July 1906 for technical education, brought under the Council in 1910.
  • Study in Japan: Funds were raised to send students to Japan for advanced learning.
  • Jadavpur University: The College and the Institute were later merged, and Jadavpur University was established on 24 December 1955.

The government treated the Council's institutions as hotbeds of Swadeshi activity and banned nationalist activities in them, such as the singing of patriotic songs. The Bande Mataram daily, started in 1906, added national education to swadeshi and boycott as a third demand, and the Calcutta Congress of December 1906 made it one of the four objectives of the Congress.

Samitis, Festivals and Atma Shakti: Organising the Masses

Corps of volunteers, called samitis, became a popular and powerful method of mass mobilisation. The best known was the Swadesh Bandhab Samiti, founded at Barisal by the educationist Ashwini Kumar Dutta to promote Indian-made goods and the boycott of foreign goods. Samitis spread political awareness through magic-lantern lectures and Swadeshi songs, trained members physically and morally, did social work in famines and epidemics, ran schools, taught Swadeshi crafts and held arbitration courts.

Traditional festivals and melas were used to reach people. Tilak's Ganapati and Shivaji festivals became a means of Swadeshi propaganda not only in western India but also in Bengal, and folk theatre carried the message in Bengal.

The stress on atma shakti, or self-reliance, meant reasserting national dignity, honour and confidence and regenerating villages socially and economically. In practice it included campaigns against caste oppression, early marriage, dowry and the consumption of alcohol.

Swadeshi Culture: Vande Mataram, Bharat Mata, Songs and Art

The movement gave Indian nationalism its symbols. Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay composed Vande Mataram in the 1870s, and it was first published in 1882 in his novel Anandamath. It was widely sung during the Swadeshi movement, and the Congress adopted it in 1905 as a pan-Indian salutation to Mother India. The authorities banned its public singing, and people kept singing it. On 20 May 1906 over 10,000 Hindus and Muslims marched through Barisal carrying Vande Mataram flags. The Bande Mataram daily, started in 1906 by Bipin Chandra Pal, was soon taken over by Aurobindo Ghose and spread the idea of freedom day by day.

Writers, artists and scientists joined in.

  • Songs: Tagore, Rajni Kanta Sen, Dwijendralal Ray, Mukunda Das and others wrote songs that nationalists of every shade sang. Vande Mataram travelled too: Subramania Bharati translated it into Tamil, and Lala Lajpat Rai gave its name to a journal he started in Punjab.
  • Bharat Mata: In 1905 Abanindranath Tagore painted Bharat Mata as a calm, composed, ascetic figure dispensing learning, food and clothing.
  • The Swadeshi flag: A tricolour of red, green and yellow, with eight lotuses for the eight provinces of British India and a crescent moon for Hindus and Muslims.
  • Painting and the Bengal School: Abanindranath led the Bengal School, the Indian style of painting associated with Swadeshi, and the Indian Society of Oriental Art, founded in 1907, gave its first scholarship to Nandalal Bose.
  • Science: Jagadish Chandra Bose and Prafulla Chandra Ray pioneered original research that drew praise across the world.

The symbols had a cost. Many Extremist leaders drew on Indian history, cultural heritage and Hindu traditional symbols, and Muslims often felt that the movement had Hindu overtones.

Leaders, Regions and Participants of the Swadeshi Movement

Lal-Bal-Pal and the Spread Beyond Bengal

The Swadeshi movement of 1905 to 1907 greatly broadened the Congress's appeal among the middle classes and threw up towering leaders: Bal Gangadhar Tilak of Maharashtra, Bipin Chandra Pal of Bengal and Lala Lajpat Rai of Punjab. Known together as Lal-Bal-Pal, they came from three provinces far apart, which showed the all-India reach of the struggle.

The movement spread from Bengal to other regions.

  • Maharashtra: Tilak spread the movement in Poona and Bombay.
  • Punjab: Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh led it, and Ajit Singh's Anjuman-i-Mohisban-i-Watan in Lahore carried its own journal, Bharat Mata.
  • Delhi: Syed Haider Raza led the movement.
  • Madras: V.O. Chidambaram Pillai led it from Tuticorin.

Tilak saw in the movement a challenge and an opportunity to organise a popular mass struggle against British rule and to unite the country in a bond of common sympathy. The militant leaders, Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Pal and Aurobindo, wanted it carried outside Bengal and extended into a full political mass struggle for swaraj.

Map of India and its neighbours with twelve numbered places. Bengal: Calcutta, the Town Hall meeting of 1905; Barisal, the samiti and conference of 1906; Dacca, where the Muslim League was founded. Spread: Lahore, led by Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh; Delhi, Syed Haider Raza; Bombay and Poona, Tilak; Tuticorin, Swadeshi shipping. Repression and revolt: Muzaffarpur, the bomb of 1908; Ahmedabad, the bomb at Minto's carriage in 1909; Nashik, a district magistrate shot in 1909; Mandalay, where Tilak was sent in 1908

Students, Women, Workers and Muslims: Who Joined

Students came out in large numbers to propagate and practise swadeshi and led the picketing of shops that sold foreign goods. Women of the urban middle classes, who had been home-centred, took an active part in processions and picketing and played a larger role in the national movement from then on. The social base of the movement grew to include sections of zamindars, students, women and the lower middle classes of cities and towns. Efforts were also made to give political voice to workers' grievances through strikes in British-owned concerns such as the East Indian Railway.

Some Muslims took part, among them Barrister Abdul Rasul, Liaqat Hussain and Guznavi, and Maulana Azad, who joined a revolutionary group. But most upper-class and middle-class Muslims stayed away or, led by Nawab Salimullah of Dacca, supported the partition because it promised a Muslim-majority province. The movement also failed to win the Muslim peasantry, because of a conscious government policy of divide and rule and because class and community overlapped in many places.

Moderates and Extremists: Calcutta 1906 to the Surat Split of 1907

Congress Sessions of 1905 and 1906: Four Objectives

The Congress meeting at Benares in 1905 under Gokhale condemned the partition and Curzon's policies and supported the anti-partition and Swadeshi movement of Bengal. The Moderates led the Congress and did not want the boycott carried beyond Bengal or applied to councils and similar bodies. The Extremists, who called themselves simply Nationalists, wanted a nationwide mass movement. A mild compromise resolution averted a split for the moment.

At the Calcutta session of December 1906 the Extremists wanted Tilak or Lajpat Rai as president. The Moderates proposed Dadabhai Naoroji, whom all nationalists respected, and he was elected. As a concession to the militants the Congress declared four objectives: Swaraj, Swadeshi, boycott and national education. Swaraj was not defined, and it could mean anything from self-government within the British Empire to full independence. The word was used by the Congress for the first time, which left room for different readings by Moderates and Extremists.

The two camps differed on almost every point, from their social base to their methods.

Table 2. Moderates and Extremists compared
Point Moderates Extremists
Social base Zamindars and the upper middle classes in towns Educated middle classes in towns and the lower middle class
Inspiration Western liberal thought and European history Indian history, cultural heritage and Hindu traditional symbols
View of British rule Believed in England's providential mission and professed loyalty to the Crown Rejected the providential mission as an illusion and found the Crown unworthy of loyalty
The masses Thought the movement should stay with the middle-class intelligentsia Had immense faith in the masses' capacity to take part and make sacrifices
Goal Constitutional reforms and a share for Indians in the services Swaraj
Methods Constitutional methods only Boycott and passive resistance, even outside the constitution

The Extremists themselves were not of one mind. For Tilak, swaraj meant some form of self-government, while for Aurobindo it meant complete independence from foreign rule.

Surat Split 1907: Causes and Course

The Congress split at Surat in December 1907, on 26 and 27 December. After Calcutta the Extremists called for wide passive resistance and boycott of schools, colleges, councils, municipalities and courts. The Moderates, encouraged by news that council reforms were on the way, decided to tone down the Calcutta programme. The British authorities, alarmed by the call for swaraj, pressed some Moderate leaders to step back.

The sessions ran into a fight over venue and president. The Extremists wanted the 1907 session at Nagpur with Tilak or Lajpat Rai as president and the Swadeshi, boycott and national education resolutions repeated. The Moderates wanted Surat, in Tilak's home province of Bombay, so that Tilak could not be president, wanted Rashbehari Ghosh in the chair, and sought to drop the resolutions. Both sides took rigid positions and there was no room for compromise.

At Surat, Tilak was prevented from speaking and chaos followed. The Nationalist camp led by Tilak, Lajpat Rai and Aurobindo Ghose held a separate session. The Congress was now dominated by the Moderates, who reiterated the goal of self-government within the British Empire and the use of constitutional methods only.

Four linked steps. Benares 1905: Gokhale presides and a mild compromise averts a split. Calcutta, December 1906: Naoroji presides and the Congress adopts four objectives. 1907: The Moderates tone the programme down while the Extremists press on. Surat, December 1907: The dispute over venue and president breaks the session. After it, the Moderates keep the Congress, with self-government within the Empire, constitutional methods and the council reforms of 1909; the Extremists hold a separate session and face the laws of 1907 to 1911, and Tilak is sent to Mandalay for six years

Repression, Muslim Response and the Revolutionary Turn

Government Repression and the Carrot and Stick Policy

The government answered the movement with force. Schools and colleges whose students took part were penalised by disaffiliation or the loss of grants. Students found guilty were disqualified from government jobs and scholarships and were fined, expelled, arrested or beaten. Public singing of Vande Mataram was banned, public meetings were restricted, Swadeshi workers were prosecuted and given long sentences, leaders were arrested and deported, and the press was suppressed.

In 1908 the Eastern Bengal and Assam government banned Ashwini Kumar Dutta's Swadesh Bandhab Samiti and deported him to the United Provinces.

Between 1907 and 1911 five new laws were enforced against anti-government activity, among them the Seditious Meetings Act of 1907, the Indian Newspapers (Incitement to Offences) Act of 1908, the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1908 and the Indian Press Act of 1910. Tilak was sent to Mandalay in Burma for six years. Aurobindo and Pal retired from active politics, and Lajpat Rai left for abroad.

The British combined this with conciliation. John Morley, the Secretary of State, spoke of rallying the Moderates, and the policy ran in three stages. It first repressed the Extremists mildly to frighten the Moderates, then placated the Moderates with concessions, and finally suppressed the Extremists with full force. The Surat split showed that the policy had paid.

Barisal Conference 1906 and the Vande Mataram Circular

Barisal, the home of the Swadesh Bandhab Samiti, became a test of how far the government would go. In 1906 the Bengal government issued a circular banning the singing of Vande Mataram in any procession or public meeting. The Anti-Circular Society was formed to oppose the ban, with K.K. Mitra, the editor of Sanjibani, as its president.

The Bengal Provincial Conference met at Barisal in 1906, and the police used force against its participants. Mitra condemned the police atrocities against Swadeshi activists at the conference. The brutality did not frighten the movement. It hardened a section of the youth, and the weekly Yugantar wrote after the Barisal Conference: "The remedy lies with the people. The 30 crore people inhabiting India must raise their 60 crore hands to stop this curse of oppression. Force must be stopped by force."

Muslim Response and the Muslim League of 1906

Muslim opinion shifted during the controversy. When the plan was first announced in 1903, Muslim bodies such as The Moslem Chronicle and the Central National Muhamedan Association condemned it. In 1904 Curzon toured the Muslim-majority districts of east Bengal to win support. Once educated Muslims saw what a province of their own could offer east Bengal, which had stayed backward while opportunities centred on Calcutta, most came to support it. The Mohammedan Provincial Union was founded on 16 October 1905 to bring existing Muslim groups together.

Not all Muslims agreed. Abdul Rasul, Maulvi Liaqat Hussain and others opposed the partition, and preachers such as Din Muhammad of Mymensingh spread Swadeshi ideas.

In December 1906 several prominent Muslim leaders founded the All-India Muslim League at Dacca, now Dhaka, to defend Muslim political interests. It grew out of the All-India Muhammadan Educational Conference held at Dacca from 27 to 30 December 1906, on the proposal of Nawab Khwaja Salimullah. At first it represented only a limited section of the Muslim population, mainly its elite. The League's demand for separate electorates was met in the Indian Councils Act of 1909, known as the Morley-Minto Reforms.

Revolutionary Activity: Jugantar, the Kingsford Attack and the Alipore Case

With the open movement checked and the leaders removed, some young nationalists turned to individual violence. They had found every peaceful route closed by repression, and they concluded that the British would have to be expelled physically. Revolutionary groups already existed. The Anushilan Samiti was set up in 1902, with centres in many towns and villages, to give young men intellectual, moral and physical training. In April 1906 an inner circle around Barindra Kumar Ghosh, Aurobindo's brother, started the weekly Yugantar and the Jugantar party, which collected arms and explosives. After the police action at the Barisal Conference, its writing turned openly to force.

In late April 1908 two young members of the group, Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki, tried to kill Douglas Kingsford, a judge who had given severe sentences to Swadeshi activists, including flogging and long imprisonment. They threw bombs at a carriage at Muzaffarpur that they believed was Kingsford's, but it carried two British women, who were killed. Prafulla Chaki shot himself before arrest. Khudiram Bose, then 18, was tried and hanged on 11 August 1908, one of the first revolutionaries in Bengal to be executed by the British.

A few days after the attempt Aurobindo Ghose, Barindra and many others were arrested and held at Alipore. In the Alipore Bomb Case Aurobindo was defended by Chittaranjan Das and acquitted. Barindra and another accused were sentenced to death, later commuted to life imprisonment in the Cellular Jail in the Andamans, and most others received long terms. The verdicts were given on 6 May 1909. Aurobindo withdrew from politics and settled at Pondicherry in 1910.

Violence did not end there. In 1909 bombs were thrown at Viceroy Minto's carriage at Ahmedabad and a district magistrate was shot dead at Nashik. In December 1912 Rash Behari Bose and Sachin Sanyal threw a bomb at Viceroy Hardinge as he entered the new capital at Delhi. Revolutionary terrorism became the most substantial legacy of Swadeshi Bengal, but its narrow upper-caste social base, its religious idiom that kept Muslims aloof and its lack of any mass involvement meant that it could not withstand state repression.

Annulment of the Partition of Bengal and Assessment

Partition of Bengal Annulled: The Delhi Durbar of 12 December 1911

The partition of Bengal was annulled by King George V at the Delhi Durbar on 12 December 1911. The Bengali-speaking districts were reunited, Bihar and Orissa were taken out of Bengal, and Assam was made a separate province. The capital of India was shifted from Calcutta to Delhi in the same announcement, and Lord Hardinge was the viceroy under whom the settled fact was unsettled.

Accounts differ on the main reason. One says the government could not end the protests and agreed to reverse the partition. Another says it was done mainly to curb the menace of revolutionary terrorism. Both agree that the Swadeshi movement and its offshoots made the partition impossible to hold.

The annulment came as a shock to Muslims of Bengal, who had seen the eastern province as a sign of the government's concern for their interests. The move of the capital to Delhi, a city linked with Muslim glory, was meant partly as a sop to them, but they were not pleased. By 1911 the position of Muslims in the eastern province had improved. They held almost one-fifth of the 2,305 gazetted appointments held by Indians, against one-eighth of 1,235 higher appointments in 1901.

Lord Curzon's Policies and Their Long-Term Implications

Curzon was Viceroy from 1899 to 1905. He appointed commissions on education, irrigation, police and other branches of administration, and legislation followed their reports. He created the North West Frontier Province, sent Francis Younghusband's expedition to Tibet at the end of 1903, which ended in the Treaty of Lhasa in September 1904, and restored the Taj Mahal. He resigned in August 1905 after a dispute with Kitchener over military organisation.

Table 3. Curzon's policies and their long-term implications
Curzon's policy Long-term implication
Universities Act, 1904 Read as a way to limit access to English education; pushed nationalists to national education and the National Council of 1906
Partition of Bengal, 1905 Gave rise to the Swadeshi movement and made boycott and swadeshi methods of the national movement
Courting east Bengal's Muslims Muslim League 1906, separate electorates 1909, a precedent for 1947
Dismissing the Congress A Congress revived by the partition fight and a rise of the Extremists

Curzon had dismissed the Congress in 1900 as tottering to its fall. In the event the reverse happened. His partition of Bengal and the controversy that followed did much to revitalise the Congress, which he left more active and effective than at any time in its history.

Assessment of the Swadeshi Movement: Achievements and Limitations

Despite its gradual decline into inactivity, the movement was a turning point in modern Indian history.

Its achievements were lasting.

  • Mass participation: Students, women and some urban and rural groups who had stayed outside politics took part, and every major trend of the later national movement appeared in it, from moderation and extremism to revolutionary terrorism, from petitions to passive resistance and non-cooperation.
  • Culture and industry: Its richness went beyond politics into art, literature, science and industry.
  • Colonial ideas questioned: It undermined the hold of colonial ideas and institutions, and later struggles drew heavily on its experience.
  • New leadership: It brought Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Pal and Aurobindo to the front of the national movement.

Its limitations were as clear.

  • Peasantry untouched: It stayed mostly with the upper and middle classes and zamindars and did not reach the peasantry.
  • No organisation: It failed to create an effective organisation or party structure.
  • Muslim masses: It could not carry the Muslim masses, in part because of divide and rule and in part because of its Hindu symbols.
  • Unfocused methods: Passive resistance and non-cooperation remained mostly ideas and were never given a disciplined focus.

Why the Swadeshi Movement Declined by 1908

By 1908 the open phase of the movement was almost over, though the underground revolutionary phase went on. The reasons ran together.

  • Repression: The laws of 1907 to 1910, the prosecutions and the deportations broke the organisation.
  • Loss of leaders: Most leaders were arrested or deported by 1908, and Aurobindo and Bipin Chandra Pal left active politics.
  • Divisions: Quarrels among leaders, magnified by the Surat split, did much harm.
  • No new forms: The movement roused people but did not find new ways to use the energy it had released.
  • Narrow base: With the peasantry outside it, the movement had no mass support to fall back on once repression fell on its leaders in the towns.
  • Fatigue: It is hard to sustain a mass movement at a high pitch for long.

Dates, Names and Traps for the Examination

Key Dates of the Partition and Commonly Confused Events

Table 4. Key dates of the partition, 1903 to 1911
Date Event
December 1903 Partition plan made public
July 1905 Partition announced
7 August 1905 Boycott Resolution at the Calcutta Town Hall; formal proclamation of the Swadeshi movement
16 October 1905 Partition takes effect; day of mourning; Mohammedan Provincial Union founded
1905 Benares session of the Congress under Gokhale; Abanindranath Tagore paints Bharat Mata
1906 Bande Mataram daily; National Council of Education and Bengal National College; Jugantar party (April); Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company (October)
December 1906 Calcutta session under Naoroji adopts four objectives; All-India Muslim League founded at Dacca
December 1907 Surat split
30 April 1908 Kingsford attack at Muzaffarpur; Alipore arrests follow
1909 Indian Councils Act (Morley-Minto Reforms) with separate electorates; Alipore verdicts on 6 May
12 December 1911 Annulment announced at the Delhi Durbar; capital to Delhi

Several events of other years are often confused with the launch of the movement.

Table 5. Events often confused with the launch of the movement
Event Year Why it is not the launch
First prosecution of Tilak, 18 months of rigorous imprisonment 1897 Eight years before the movement
Chapekar brothers kill the Plague Commissioner Rand at Poona 1897 A separate episode of revolutionary violence
Deportation of Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh May 1907 The movement was already under way
Home Rule Leagues 1916 A decade later
Non-Cooperation Movement 1920‑22 Used boycott again, not for the first time
Simon Commission arrives 1928 More than twenty years later

Previous Year UPSC‑CSE Questions

Each Prelims question is explained option by option, and each Mains question comes with an answer outline.

  1. UPSC Prelims 2023Consider the following statements:
    1. Statement‑I : 7th August is declared as the National Handloom Day.
    2. Statement‑II : It was in 1905 that the Swadeshi Movement was launched on the same day.

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    1. a Both Statement‑I and Statement‑II are correct and Statement‑II is the correct explanation for Statement‑I
    2. b Both Statement‑I and Statement‑II are correct and Statement‑II is not the correct explanation for Statement‑I
    3. c Statement‑I is correct but Statement‑II is incorrect
    4. d Statement‑I is incorrect but Statement‑II is correct
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Statement I and Statement II

    Approach: Check each statement, then ask whether the second explains the first.

    • Step 1: Statement I is correct. National Handloom Day is observed on 7 August, and the first was held on 7 August 2015.
    • Step 2: Statement II is correct. The Swadeshi movement was proclaimed at the Calcutta Town Hall on 7 August 1905.
    • Step 3: The date for the Day was chosen to recall that launch, so Statement II explains Statement I.

    Trap to watch: Students who know both facts but think the Day was chosen for some other reason pick (b); the date was chosen to recall 7 August 1905.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Both Statement‑I and Statement‑II are correct and Statement‑II is the correct explanation for Statement‑I: Correct. 7 August was chosen for National Handloom Day because the Swadeshi movement was proclaimed on that day in 1905.
    • (b) Both Statement‑I and Statement‑II are correct and Statement‑II is not the correct explanation for Statement‑I: Wrong. The choice of the date is the explanation.
    • (c) Statement‑I is correct but Statement‑II is incorrect: Wrong. The Town Hall meeting of 7 August 1905 did launch the movement.
    • (d) Statement‑I is incorrect but Statement‑II is correct: Wrong. The first National Handloom Day was held on 7 August 2015.

    Answer: (a) Both Statement‑I and Statement‑II are correct and Statement‑II is the correct explanation for Statement‑I. The date of National Handloom Day recalls the launch of 7 August 1905.

  2. UPSC Prelims 2019With reference to Swadeshi Movement, consider the following statements:
    1. It contributed to the revival of the indigenous artisan crafts and industries.
    2. The National Council of Education was established as a part of Swadeshi Movement.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 2 only
    3. c Both 1 and 2
    4. d Neither 1 nor 2
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Test each statement against what the movement did.

    • Step 1: Statement 1 is correct. The movement encouraged Indian-made products and led to Swadeshi mills, soap and match factories, banks and insurance companies, so it contributed to the revival of indigenous crafts and industries.
    • Step 2: Statement 2 is also correct. The National Council of Education was set up in 1906 as the national education arm of the movement.

    Trap to watch: Statement 2 sounds like a later reform, but the Council was founded in 1906 within the movement.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 only: Wrong. Statement 2 is also correct, because the Council was founded in 1906 within the movement.
    • (b) 2 only: Wrong. Statement 1 is also correct, because the movement revived crafts and Indian industries.
    • (c) Both 1 and 2: Correct. Both the constructive programme of enterprise and the programme of national education belong to Swadeshi.
    • (d) Neither 1 nor 2: Wrong. Both statements describe the movement.

    Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2. Crafts and industry, and the National Council of Education, are both parts of the Swadeshi programme.

  3. UPSC Prelims 2016The 'Swadeshi' and 'Boycott' were adopted as methods of struggle for the first time during the
    1. a agitation against the Partition of Bengal
    2. b Home Rule Movement
    3. c Non-Cooperation Movement
    4. d visit of the Simon Commission to India
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Find the earliest movement in which swadeshi and boycott were used.

    • Step 1: Boycott was first pledged at protest meetings after the July 1905 announcement and the Boycott Resolution was passed at the Calcutta Town Hall on 7 August 1905.
    • Step 2: The other three come later: Home Rule in 1916, Non-Cooperation from 1920 and the Simon Commission in 1928. They used the methods again but did not originate them.

    Trap to watch: Non-Cooperation is the best-known boycott, which tempts (c); the first use was in 1905.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) agitation against the Partition of Bengal: Correct. Swadeshi and boycott were launched in 1905.
    • (b) Home Rule Movement: Wrong. The Home Rule movement of Tilak and Annie Besant dates from 1916, over a decade later.
    • (c) Non-Cooperation Movement: Wrong. It was decided on in 1920 and took boycott up as an existing method.
    • (d) visit of the Simon Commission to India: Wrong. The Commission came to India in 1928 and was boycotted.

    Answer: (a) agitation against the Partition of Bengal. Swadeshi and boycott were first used in the 1905 agitation, before the Home Rule, Non-Cooperation and Simon Commission protests.

  4. UPSC Prelims 2016What was the main reason for the split in the Indian National Congress at Surat in 1907?
    1. a Introduction of communalism into Indian politics by Lord Minto
    2. b Extremists' lack of faith in the capacity of the moderates to negotiate with the British Government
    3. c Foundation of Muslim League
    4. d Aurobindo Ghosh's inability to be elected as the President of the Indian National Congress
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Look for the cause of the split in the dispute between the two camps over methods.

    • Step 1: The split came after the Extremists, emboldened by the Calcutta session, wanted to widen the boycott and passive resistance while the Moderates, encouraged by news of council reforms, wanted to tone the programme down. The Extremists considered the Moderates a drag on the movement and did not believe they could win anything by negotiating with the British.
    • Step 2: Check the other options against this. Minto's communal policy and the Muslim League of December 1906 were separate developments, and the Extremists' choices for president were Tilak or Lajpat Rai, not Aurobindo.

    Trap to watch: The Muslim League and Minto's policy belong to the same years but did not split the Congress.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Introduction of communalism into Indian politics by Lord Minto: Wrong. Separate electorates came in 1909, after Surat, and were not a cause of the split.
    • (b) Extremists' lack of faith in the capacity of the moderates to negotiate with the British Government: Correct. This was the basic difference over methods and the extent of the movement.
    • (c) Foundation of Muslim League: Wrong. The League was founded in December 1906 and did not cause a split in the Congress.
    • (d) Aurobindo Ghosh's inability to be elected as the President of the Indian National Congress: Wrong. The Extremists wanted Tilak or Lajpat Rai as president.

    Answer: (b) Extremists' lack of faith in the capacity of the moderates to negotiate with the British Government. The Extremists had lost faith in the Moderates' ability to win anything by negotiation.

  5. UPSC Prelims 2015Which one of the following movements has contributed to a split in the Indian National Congress resulting in the emergence of 'moderates' and 'extremists'?
    1. a Swadeshi Movement
    2. b Quit India Movement
    3. c Non-Cooperation Movement
    4. d Civil Disobedience Movement
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Find the movement whose programme divided the Congress before 1907.

    • Step 1: The Swadeshi movement of 1905 to 1907 produced the dispute over boycott, passive resistance and the extent of the movement that ended in the Surat split of December 1907, after which the Moderates and the Extremists worked separately.
    • Step 2: The other movements came later: Non-Cooperation was decided on in 1920, Civil Disobedience began in 1930 and Quit India belongs to 1942.

    Trap to watch: Non-Cooperation also used boycott, but the split came in 1907.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Swadeshi Movement: Correct. Its programme split the Congress at Surat in 1907.
    • (b) Quit India Movement: Wrong. It belongs to 1942.
    • (c) Non-Cooperation Movement: Wrong. It began in 1920, long after the Moderate-Extremist split.
    • (d) Civil Disobedience Movement: Wrong. It began with the Salt March in 1930.

    Answer: (a) Swadeshi Movement. The Swadeshi movement led to the Moderate-Extremist split at Surat.

  6. UPSC Prelims 2014The Partition of Bengal made by Lord Curzon in 1905 lasted until
    1. a the First World War when Indian leaders decided to support the British and demanded its annulment as a quid pro quo
    2. b King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911
    3. c Gandhiji launched his Civil Disobedience Movement
    4. d the Partition of India in 1947
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Date the end of the partition and test each option against it.

    • Step 1: The partition was annulled on 12 December 1911 when King George V announced at the Delhi Durbar that the Bengali-speaking districts would be reunited.
    • Step 2: Every other option names a later date. The First World War began in 1914, the Civil Disobedience Movement began in 1930 and the partition of India was in 1947.

    Trap to watch: 1947 was a second partition of Bengal, not the end of the first.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) the First World War when Indian leaders decided to support the British and demanded its annulment as a quid pro quo: Wrong. The annulment came in 1911, before the war began in 1914.
    • (b) King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911: Correct. The announcement was made on 12 December 1911.
    • (c) Gandhiji launched his Civil Disobedience Movement: Wrong. That movement began in 1930, long after Bengal was reunited.
    • (d) the Partition of India in 1947: Wrong. The 1905 partition was undone in 1911, and 1947 was a second partition of Bengal.

    Answer: (b) King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911. The partition lasted until the Durbar announcement of 12 December 1911.

  7. UPSC Prelims 2010What was the immediate cause for the launch of the Swadeshi movement?
    1. a The partition of Bengal done by Lord Curzon
    2. b A sentence of 18 months rigorous imprisonment imposed on Lokmanya Tilak
    3. c The arrest and deportation of Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh; and passing of the Punjab Colonization Bill
    4. d Death sentence pronounced on the Chapekar brothers
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Date each option and find the one that set off the movement in 1905.

    • Step 1: The Swadeshi movement was launched at the Calcutta Town Hall on 7 August 1905 as the answer to Curzon's partition, which came into force on 16 October 1905.
    • Step 2: Test each other option against the date. Tilak's sentence of 18 months and the Chapekar brothers' murder of Rand both belong to 1897, eight years earlier. The deportation of Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh was in May 1907, when the movement was already under way.

    Only the partition set off the movement.

    Trap to watch: Tilak's sentence and the Chapekar case sound like causes, but they belong to 1897.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) The partition of Bengal done by Lord Curzon: Correct. The Boycott Resolution of 7 August 1905 was the response to the partition decision announced in July 1905.
    • (b) A sentence of 18 months rigorous imprisonment imposed on Lokmanya Tilak: Wrong. This was Tilak's first prosecution, in 1897.
    • (c) The arrest and deportation of Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh; and passing of the Punjab Colonization Bill: Wrong. The deportations came in May 1907, after the movement had begun.
    • (d) Death sentence pronounced on the Chapekar brothers: Wrong. The brothers killed the Plague Commissioner Rand at Poona in 1897, a separate episode.

    Answer: (a) The partition of Bengal done by Lord Curzon. The partition of Bengal launched the movement; every other option is an episode of 1897 or 1907.

  8. UPSC Prelims 2010Four resolutions were passed at the famous Calcutta session of Indian National Congress in 1906. The question of either retention OR of rejection of these four resolutions became the cause of a split in Congress at the next Congress session held in Surat in 1907. Which one of the following was not one of those resolutions?
    1. a Annulment of partition of Bengal
    2. b Boycott
    3. c National education
    4. d Swadeshi
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: List the four Calcutta resolutions and find the option that is not among them.

    • Step 1: At Calcutta in December 1906, under Dadabhai Naoroji, the Congress adopted four objectives: Swaraj, Swadeshi, boycott and national education.
    • Step 2: Remove the three options that appear on that list; the one left, annulment of the partition, was never a resolution, and the partition was in fact annulled only in 1911.

    Trap to watch: Annulment was the movement's demand, but it was not one of the four Calcutta resolutions.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Annulment of partition of Bengal: Correct. It was not one of the four resolutions, which were Swaraj, Swadeshi, boycott and national education; the partition was annulled only in 1911.
    • (b) Boycott: Wrong. It was one of the four resolutions.
    • (c) National education: Wrong. It was one of the four resolutions.
    • (d) Swadeshi: Wrong. It was one of the four resolutions.

    Answer: (a) Annulment of partition of Bengal. Annulment of the partition was not among the four Calcutta resolutions.

  9. UPSC Prelims 2009In the context of the Indian freedom struggle, 16th October 1905 is well known for which one of the following reasons?
    1. a The formal proclamation of Swadeshi Movement was made in Calcutta town hall
    2. b Partition of Bengal took effect
    3. c Dadabhai Naoroji declared that the goal of Indian National Congress was Swaraj
    4. d Lokmanya Tilak started Swadeshi Movement in Poona
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Match 16 October 1905 with the event of that day.

    • Step 1: Separate the two 1905 dates. The formal proclamation of the Swadeshi movement was on 7 August; 16 October was the day the partition came into force, observed as a day of mourning in Bengal.
    • Step 2: Naoroji's declaration of swaraj as the Congress goal was made as president of the Calcutta session of December 1906, and Tilak spread the movement to Poona and Bombay after it began in Bengal.

    Trap to watch: 7 August and 16 October 1905 are often swapped; the Town Hall resolution came first.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) The formal proclamation of Swadeshi Movement was made in Calcutta town hall: Wrong. That was on 7 August 1905.
    • (b) Partition of Bengal took effect: Correct. It came into force on 16 October 1905, which was observed as a day of mourning.
    • (c) Dadabhai Naoroji declared that the goal of Indian National Congress was Swaraj: Wrong. He did so at the Calcutta session of 1906.
    • (d) Lokmanya Tilak started Swadeshi Movement in Poona: Wrong. The movement began in Bengal, and Tilak led its spread in Poona and Bombay.

    Answer: (b) Partition of Bengal took effect. 16 October 1905 is the day the partition took effect.

  10. UPSC Prelims 2007The song 'Amar Sonar Bangla', written during the Swadeshi Movement of India, inspired the Liberation Struggle of Bangladesh and was adopted as the National Anthem of Bangladesh. Who wrote this song?
    1. a Rajni Kanta Sen
    2. b Dwijendralal Ray
    3. c Mukunda Das
    4. d Rabindranath Tagore
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Recall who wrote the song, then rule out the other song-writers of the period.

    • Step 1: Amar Sonar Bangla is an ode to Mother Bengal by Rabindranath Tagore, linked with the partition protests of 1905, and the Provisional Government of Bangladesh adopted it as the national anthem in 1971.
    • Step 2: The other three names were composers of other songs of the Swadeshi years, which is why they are plausible, but none wrote this one.

    Trap to watch: The other three names also wrote songs of the Swadeshi years.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Rajni Kanta Sen: Wrong. He wrote other patriotic songs of the Swadeshi years.
    • (b) Dwijendralal Ray: Wrong. He too wrote Swadeshi-era songs, among them Dhana Dhanya Pushpa Bhara, which was a rival proposal for Bangladesh's anthem and was dropped.
    • (c) Mukunda Das: Wrong. He was another composer of Swadeshi songs.
    • (d) Rabindranath Tagore: Correct. Tagore wrote Amar Sonar Bangla.

    Answer: (d) Rabindranath Tagore. Tagore wrote Amar Sonar Bangla, the song adopted as Bangladesh's national anthem in 1971.

  11. UPSC Prelims 1998Assertion and Reason:
    1. Assertion (A): Partition of Bengal in 1905 brought to an end the Moderates' role in the Indian freedom movement.
    2. Reason (R): The Surat session of Indian National Congress separated the Extremists from the Moderates.
    1. a Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
    2. b Both A and R are true, but R is NOT a correct explanation of A
    3. c A is true, but R is false
    4. d A is false, but R is true
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Assertion and Reason

    Approach: Test the Assertion and the Reason separately, then ask whether the Reason explains the Assertion.

    • Step 1: Test the Assertion. The partition brought the Extremists to the front, but the Moderates did not leave the movement. After Surat the Congress was dominated by the Moderates, who reiterated self-government within the Empire and constitutional methods, and the government went on to court them with reforms. So A is false.
    • Step 2: Test the Reason. The Surat session of December 1907 did separate the Extremists from the Moderates, so R is true.
    • Step 3: With A false and R true the answer is (d).

    Trap to watch: The Extremists' rise after 1905 can make the Assertion look true; the Moderates kept the Congress.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A: Wrong. A is false.
    • (b) Both A and R are true, but R is NOT a correct explanation of A: Wrong. A is false, so the pair cannot both be true.
    • (c) A is true, but R is false: Wrong. It is the reverse, with A false and R true.
    • (d) A is false, but R is true: Correct. The Moderates stayed in charge of the Congress after Surat.

    Answer: (d) A is false, but R is true. The partition did not end the Moderates' role, though the Surat split did separate the two groups.

  12. UPSC Mains 2020 GS‑IEvaluate the policies of Lord Curzon and their long term implications on the national movement.
    Answer outline

    The outline sets out what the question asks, the main arguments, relevant examples and the direction of the conclusion; it is not a full model answer.

    Directive verb: Evaluate

    Approach: Group the policies, then judge each by what it did to the national movement.

    Introduction: Curzon, Viceroy from 1899 to 1905, was an energetic administrator who appointed commissions on education, irrigation and police, created the North West Frontier Province and sent Younghusband's mission to Tibet, which ended in the Treaty of Lhasa in 1904.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Education: The Indian Universities Act of 1904 was read as limiting access to English education and led to the National Council of Education in 1906.
    • Partition of Bengal: The stated reason was administrative size; the nationalists read divide and rule by language and religion.
    • Implications for the movement: Swadeshi, boycott, national education, the rise of the Extremists, mass protest and the revival of the Congress.
    • Communal implications: The Muslim League of 1906, separate electorates of 1909 and a precedent for 1947.

    Conclusion: Curzon hoped to bind India to the Raj but left a Congress more active and effective than ever, while the partition also fed communal politics.

Sources

Editorial Disclaimer

This article draws on the NCERT history textbooks and the other sources listed under Sources. Where accounts give different dates, NCERT's are used.

See more of our UPSC articles in Google Search

Add to Preferred Sources

More on Moderates & Extremists

All articles on Moderates & Extremists