Overview

Irrigation is the supply of water to crops by artificial means, over and above what rainfall provides. Irrigation in India matters because rainfall varies so much across space and seasons. In 2023‑24, India irrigated 82,416 thousand hectares, or 59.30 per cent of its net sown area, drawing water from tube-wells and other wells, canals, tanks and other sources such as streams and ponds. The Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY), launched on 1 July 2015, is the Centre's main programme for extending and improving irrigation, while groundwater depletion, waterlogging and inter-State water disputes are the main problems of the system.

Irrigation Needs of India: Monsoon Variability and Crop Water Demand

Rainfall Variability and the Case for Irrigation

The need for irrigation in India begins with the monsoon. Rainfall is concentrated in a few months and is unevenly spread over the country, so the north-western plains and the Deccan Plateau receive too little, while even high-rainfall States face breaks and failures of the monsoon.

Irrigation also follows the needs of particular crops. Rice, sugarcane and jute need far more water than rainfall alone can give in most regions, and the high-yielding varieties introduced in the 1960s need a regular supply of moisture. Where water is assured, farmers can raise more than one crop on the same field in a year, and irrigated land gives higher yields than unirrigated land. This is why the Green Revolution strategy succeeded mainly in Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh, where wheat and rice are grown largely under irrigation.

The link between water and food is visible in the cropping pattern. In 2023‑24, cereals and millets took about 58 per cent of the area irrigated under crops, followed by oilseeds at 11 per cent, pulses at 7 per cent, and fruits and vegetables at 7 per cent. Coverage also differs sharply between crops. Irrigation reaches less than 15 per cent of the area under millets and around 26 per cent of the area under pulses, but about 67 per cent of the area under rice.

Protective and Productive Irrigation and Project Classes

Irrigation in India is planned with two different aims. Protective irrigation protects crops from a shortage of soil moisture. It acts as a supplement to rainfall, and its strategy is to give some moisture to the largest possible area. Productive irrigation supplies enough moisture through the cropping season to obtain high productivity, so the water applied per unit of cultivated land is higher. A drought-prone plateau district therefore needs a thin spread of protective irrigation, while the Green Revolution belt depends on productive irrigation.

Irrigation projects are also grouped by the size of their culturable command area (CCA), the area a project can irrigate:

  • Major projects: Projects with a CCA of more than 10,000 hectares.
  • Medium projects: Projects with a CCA between 2,000 and 10,000 hectares.
  • Minor projects: Projects with a CCA of 2,000 hectares or less; these draw on both surface water and groundwater, while major and medium projects mostly use surface water.

The ultimate irrigation potential of the country, the area that could finally be brought under irrigation by surface water and groundwater together, has been assessed at 139 million hectares, or 1,39,000 thousand hectares. Against this, the net irrigated area in 2023‑24 was 82,416 thousand hectares.

Sources of Irrigation in India

Canal Irrigation: Perennial Canals, Inundation Channels and Lift Schemes

Canal irrigation carries river water to fields through a network of main canals, branches and distributaries. A perennial canal is fed all year from a river or a storage dam. The Himalayan rivers of the Indus, Ganga and Brahmaputra systems are perennial because they are fed both by melting snow and by rainfall, so the old canal systems of the northern plains draw on them. Peninsular rivers have a non-perennial flow, the Narmada and the Tapi being exceptions, so their water has to be held in storage dams before canals can use it.

Inundation channels only lead the flood water of a river onto the fields, as in the flood plains of Bengal, where people built them to irrigate their crops.

Canal building in India is old, and two works mark its early history:

  • Grand Anicut (Kallanai): Built across the Kaveri by the Chola ruler Karikala, it is the oldest water-regulating structure in India still in use.
  • Canals of Firoz Shah Tughlaq: In the fourteenth century he built the most extensive canal irrigation system of his time, around the Indo-Gangetic doab and the region west of the Yamuna.

After Independence, multipurpose river valley projects such as Bhakra-Nangal, Hirakud, Damodar Valley and Nagarjuna Sagar, and the Indira Gandhi Canal Project in Rajasthan, were taken up mainly for irrigation. The Indira Gandhi Canal, the longest canal in India, begins at the Harike Barrage at the confluence of the Satluj and Beas and carries water into the Thar Desert, where mustard, cotton and wheat are now grown.

Three figures from 2023‑24 show the place of canals today:

  • National share: Canals irrigated 17,420 thousand hectares, about 21 per cent of the net irrigated area, against 39.78 per cent in 1950‑51.
  • Ownership: Government canals account for almost all of it, 17,257 thousand hectares, and private canals for only 163 thousand hectares.
  • State weight: The largest canal-irrigated areas were in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat, but canals carry a larger share than the national 21 per cent in Haryana, which irrigated 1,237 of its 3,225 thousand hectares by canal, and in Andhra Pradesh, with 1,008 of its 2,603 thousand hectares.

Lift irrigation raises water from a river, canal or reservoir to fields at a higher level by pumping. Two large schemes show its reach:

  • Sardar Sarovar Project: On the Narmada, it irrigates 37,500 hectares in the tribal hilly tract of Maharashtra by lift.
  • Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project: On the Godavari in Telangana, opened on 21 June 2019, it is the world's largest multi-stage lift irrigation project.

Wells and Tube-Wells: The Largest Source of Irrigation

Well irrigation draws groundwater from aquifers below the fields. A tube-well, or borewell, is a narrow, mechanically drilled well that reaches deep aquifers and is worked by a pump, while open wells, the older kind, were for centuries worked by lifting devices turned by oxen or by hand. Tube-wells spread rapidly after the 1960s, together with the Green Revolution, helped by subsidised electricity for pump-sets and easier credit. The Indo-Gangetic Plain has large groundwater storage and needs only shallow bores, while the hard-rock aquifers of the Peninsula need deeper drilling and give less certain yields.

In 2023‑24, tube-wells irrigated 39,405 thousand hectares, about 48 per cent of the net irrigated area, and other wells a further 12,468 thousand hectares, about 15 per cent. The share of tube-wells has risen from 0.55 per cent in 1960‑61, while the share of other wells has fallen from 28.67 per cent in 1950‑51. India has the world's largest area irrigated from groundwater wells, ahead of China and the United States.

Groundwater carries most of the irrigation in the States of the Green Revolution. In 2023‑24, Punjab irrigated 3,182 thousand hectares of its 4,109 thousand hectares from tube-wells and the rest from canals, and Uttar Pradesh irrigated 9,797 thousand hectares of its 13,656 thousand hectares from tube-wells. In Maharashtra, open wells matter more than tube-wells, at 3,155 thousand hectares out of 6,496 thousand hectares. Cheap and, in places, free electricity for farm pumps made groundwater the farmer's first choice, and the same policy let water tables fall to dangerously low levels in parts of the country.

The use of wells for irrigation is very old in India. The Rigveda refers to wells from which a rope strap and a wheel drew up pails of water, and the araghatta, a large wheel with earthen pots fastened to its rim, lifted water from wells. It was turned by oxen or people, and the same kind of device is also called the Persian wheel or saqiyah.

Tank Irrigation and Traditional Water Structures

Tank irrigation stores monsoon rainfall and run-off in small reservoirs, from which water is released to the fields as and when it is required. Tanks suit the Peninsula because its rivers are non-perennial and carry very little water in the dry season, so water has to be stored while it is available.

Tanks are among India's oldest irrigation works. Bhopal Lake, built in the eleventh century, was one of the largest artificial lakes of its time, and the tank at Hauz Khas in Delhi was built by Alauddin Khalji to supply the Siri Fort area. In the hills and deserts, communities built their own structures, such as the kuls or guls of the Western Himalayas, which divert stream water to village tanks, and the khadins of Jaisalmer and johads of other parts of Rajasthan, which hold rainwater on the fields.

The share of tanks in the net irrigated area fell from 17.33 per cent in 1950‑51 to about 4 per cent in 2023‑24, when they irrigated 3,136 thousand hectares. Neglect and silting reduced the storage of many tanks. Telangana illustrates the trend. About 70,000 tanks irrigated around 25 lakh acres (about 10 lakh hectares) in 1956, but only 46,531 tanks were left by 2014, nearly half of them dry. Telangana's Mission Kakatiya, begun on 12 March 2015, desilted these tanks and lakes to restore their storage. In 2023‑24 the largest tank-irrigated area was in West Bengal, at 904 thousand hectares, followed by Madhya Pradesh with 440, Tamil Nadu with 401 and Telangana with 372 thousand hectares.

Table 1. Sources of Irrigation in India, 2023‑24
Source Net irrigated area, 2023‑24 (thousand hectares) Share of net irrigated area, 2023‑24 (per cent) Share of net irrigated area, 1950‑51 (per cent) States with the largest area, 2023‑24
Tube-wells 39,405 48 Included under other wells Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab
Canals 17,420 21 39.78 Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat
Other wells 12,468 15 28.67 Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat
Tanks 3,136 4 17.33 West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Telangana
Other sources 9,987 12 14.22 Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra
Total 82,416 100 100 Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan

Micro-Irrigation: Drip and Sprinkler Systems

How Drip and Sprinkler Irrigation Work

Micro-irrigation applies water in small, measured quantities close to the plant through a network of pipes, instead of flooding the whole field. Drip irrigation delivers water slowly and directly to the root zone through small outlets, called emitters, fitted on thin pipes or tubes. In on-line drip systems the drippers are fixed along the pipe wherever a plant stands, which suits crops with uneven spacing; in in-line systems the drippers are built into the pipe at fixed intervals, so all plants get water evenly.

Sprinkler irrigation sprays water under pressure into the air through nozzles attached to a network of pipes, so that it falls on the crop like rain. It is widely used for cereals, pulses, spices and other field crops. Its forms range from portable sprinklers and semi-permanent systems to micro sprinklers for nurseries and leafy vegetables, mini sprinklers for close-growing crops such as groundnut, potato and onion, and large-volume rain-guns that cover a big area quickly. Both drip and sprinkler systems allow fertigation, the application of fertilisers with irrigation water directly to the zone where most of the plant's roots develop.

Water-Use Efficiency and the Limits of Micro-Irrigation

Water-use efficiency is, at its simplest, the ratio of the crop biomass produced to the water the plant uses; on a farm it rises when more crop is obtained from each unit of water applied. Flood irrigation loses much of its water to evaporation and deep drainage, while drip and sprinkler systems deliver water directly to the crop with minimum losses.

Micro-irrigation saves 20 to 48 per cent of water, 10 to 17 per cent of energy, 30 to 40 per cent of labour cost and 11 to 19 per cent of fertiliser, and raises crop yields by 20 to 38 per cent, and an evaluation of Per Drop More Crop found that water-use efficiency improved by 30 to 70 per cent under the scheme.

Drip irrigation lessens weed growth, because only the soil around each plant is wetted, and lessens soil erosion, because no water runs over the surface. Because it saves water at the farm level, it helps conserve groundwater. Between its start in 2015‑16 and July 2026, the Per Drop More Crop scheme brought over 115 lakh hectares under micro-irrigation, about 8.11 per cent of India's net sown area; Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Rajasthan covered the largest areas in 2025‑26.

Micro-irrigation has limits. The equipment is costly, so the scheme meets 55 per cent of the cost of the system for small and marginal farmers and 45 per cent for other farmers, for up to five hectares per beneficiary. Emitters clog unless the water is filtered and the system maintained. Because drip systems apply so little water, salts brought in with the irrigation water can build up in the root zone, usually at the edge of the wetted patch, so drip does not by itself remove soil salinity. Where water is severely limited, farmers may use the saved water to grow more rather than to pump less, so the gain shows up as higher production and not as lower withdrawal.

Micro-irrigation is also not the only answer for dry areas. Dryland farming, in regions with less than 75 cm of annual rainfall, relies mainly on hardy, drought-resistant crops such as ragi, bajra, moong and gram, with soil moisture conservation and rainwater harvesting.

Irrigated Area in India: Spread Across States and Growth

State-wise Irrigation Coverage in 2023‑24

The irrigated area in India is spread very unevenly across States. In 2023‑24, the net irrigated area was 100 per cent of the net sown area in Punjab, 91.75 per cent in Haryana and 83.44 per cent in Uttar Pradesh, and Puducherry reached 97.43 per cent. At the other end, Himachal Pradesh irrigated 21.31 per cent and Mizoram 6.07 per cent of their net sown area. The national average was 59.30 per cent, so about two-fifths of the net sown area still depends on rainfall alone.

The pattern follows the physical base. The alluvial plains of the north-west and the Ganga valley combine perennial rivers with rich aquifers, so both canals and tube-wells work well there. The Peninsula, with non-perennial rivers and hard-rock aquifers, depends more on tanks, open wells and storage dams, and its coverage is lower. The hill and north-eastern States rely heavily on rainfall, so little of their land is irrigated.

Map of India's States shaded by the share of net sown area that was irrigated in 2023-24, in four classes: Under 25 per cent, 25 to 50 per cent, 50 to 75 per cent, and 75 per cent and above. Labelled: Punjab 100 per cent, Haryana 91.75 per cent, Uttar Pradesh 83.44 per cent, Himachal Pradesh 21.31 per cent and Mizoram 6.07 per cent, numbered 1 to 5. Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh are in the highest class; the hill and north-eastern States are in the lowest. The all-India figure is 59.30 per cent. Jammu and Kashmir with Ladakh, and some small Union Territories, are not shown.

Gross irrigated area stood at 1,30,548 thousand hectares in 2023‑24, or 59.91 per cent of the gross cropped area, and irrigation intensity, the ratio of gross to net irrigated area, was 158.40 per cent.

Growth of Irrigated Area Since 1950‑51

The irrigated area in India has grown about fourfold since Independence. The net irrigated area rose from 20,853 thousand hectares in 1950‑51 to 82,416 thousand hectares in 2023‑24, and its share of the net sown area rose from 17.56 per cent to 59.30 per cent. India began with a handicap. At Partition about one-third of the irrigated land of undivided India went to Pakistan, which reduced the irrigated share in independent India.

The growth came in distinct phases, each led by a different source:

  • 1950s and 1960s: Large canal and multipurpose projects of the Five Year Plans raised canal irrigation from 8,295 thousand hectares in 1950‑51 to 12,838 thousand hectares in 1970‑71.
  • Late 1960s onwards: Tube-wells spread with the Green Revolution and subsidised electricity for pump-sets, from 135 thousand hectares in 1960‑61 to 4,461 thousand hectares in 1970‑71 and 14,257 thousand hectares in 1990‑91.
  • 1990s onwards: Canal area levelled off between about 14,000 and 19,000 thousand hectares, while tube-wells kept growing to 39,405 thousand hectares in 2023‑24 and became the main source of growth.

Tanks moved the other way, from 3,613 thousand hectares in 1950‑51 to a low of 1,585 thousand hectares in 2009‑10, before recovering to 3,136 thousand hectares in 2023‑24. The result is a shift from surface water to groundwater. In 1950‑51 canals, other wells and tanks were the main sources, while by 2023‑24 tube-wells irrigated more land than canals and tanks together.

Line chart of net irrigated area by source in thousand hectares, from 1950-51 to 2023-24. Tube-wells, counted with other wells in 1950-51, rose from 135 in 1960-61 to 39,405 in 2023-24. Canals rose from 8,295 to 17,420. Other wells went from 5,978 to 12,468, other sources from 2,967 to 9,987, and tanks fell from 3,613 to a low near 2,000 before reaching 3,136 in 2023-24.

NCERT puts irrigation at about 33 per cent of the cultivated area, while the land use statistics for 2023‑24 give 59.30 per cent of the net sown area. NCERT's figure reflects older data, and the 2023‑24 figure is the current one.

Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY)

PMKSY Objectives: Har Khet Ko Pani and Per Drop More Crop

The Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY) was launched on 1 July 2015 to give every farm access to some means of protective irrigation. Its two mottoes state its purpose: Har Khet Ko Pani (water to every field) aims to expand the area under assured irrigation, and Per Drop More Crop aims to raise the efficiency with which that water is used on the farm. The scheme brought earlier irrigation and watershed programmes under one umbrella so that water sources, distribution and farm-level use could be planned together.

The scheme's broad objectives are these:

  • Converge investment: Bring irrigation investment together at field level through district and, where needed, sub-district water-use plans.
  • Expand assured irrigation: Enhance physical access to water on the farm and expand the cultivable area under assured irrigation.
  • Raise efficiency: Improve on-farm water-use efficiency and promote precision irrigation and other water-saving technologies.
  • Recharge aquifers: Enhance the recharge of aquifers and introduce sustainable water conservation practices.
  • Develop rainfed areas: Develop rainfed areas through the watershed approach to soil and water conservation.
  • Reuse wastewater: Explore the reuse of treated municipal wastewater for peri-urban agriculture.
  • Draw private investment: Attract greater private investment in irrigation.

The scheme's guidelines provide for an Inter-Ministerial National Steering Committee under the Prime Minister and a National Executive Committee under the Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog to oversee its implementation. In December 2021, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs approved PMKSY for 2021‑26 with an outlay of ₹93,068 crore, including central support of ₹37,454 crore to the States.

PMKSY Components: AIBP, Har Khet Ko Pani and Watershed Development

PMKSY works through separate components run by three departments. The Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme (AIBP) finances the completion of ongoing major and medium irrigation projects, including national projects. It began in 1996‑97, when the Centre gave additional assistance to the States by way of loans on a matching basis for early completion of selected large irrigation and multipurpose projects. Between 2016‑17 and August 2025, 66 major and medium projects were completed under it, creating or restoring irrigation potential of 29.22 lakh hectares.

Har Khet Ko Pani creates new water sources through minor irrigation, from both surface water and groundwater, and improves physical access to water on the farm. It has four sub-components: Command Area Development and Water Management; Surface Minor Irrigation; Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Water Bodies; and Ground Water Development. Command area development is older than PMKSY. The Command Area Development Programme has been under implementation since 1974‑75 to close the gap between the irrigation potential created by projects and the potential actually used, and to raise crop productivity in their command areas.

In April 2025, the Cabinet approved the Modernisation of Command Area Development and Water Management (M‑CADWM) as a sub-scheme of PMKSY for 2025‑26, with an initial outlay of ₹1,600 crore. It began with pilot projects in different agroclimatic zones and is designed to carry water from existing canals or other sources to farm gates of up to one hectare through underground pressurised pipes, to use supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) and Internet of Things technology for water accounting, and to hand the assets to Water User Societies under Irrigation Management Transfer.

The Watershed Development Component, run by the Department of Land Resources, develops rainfed and degraded land through soil and water conservation. Per Drop More Crop, the micro-irrigation component, was part of PMKSY from 2015‑16 to 2021‑22 and has since 2022‑23 been implemented under the Pradhan Mantri Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana by the Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.

Table 2. Components of PMKSY and Their Progress, 2016‑17 to August 2025
Implemented by Component What it funds Progress, 2016‑17 to August 2025
Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme Completion of major and medium irrigation projects 66 projects completed; 29.22 lakh hectares of irrigation potential created or restored
Command Area Development and Water Management Use of the irrigation potential created in project commands 17 projects completed; 22.21 lakh hectares of command area developed
Surface Minor Irrigation and Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Water Bodies Small surface schemes and revival of water bodies 3,462 schemes completed; 4.96 lakh hectares of irrigation potential
Ground Water Development Groundwater irrigation through wells 0.89 lakh hectares of irrigation potential; 29,779 wells
Department of Land Resources Watershed Development Component Soil and water conservation in rainfed and degraded land 9,434 projects taken up over 92.02 lakh hectares
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Per Drop More Crop Drip and sprinkler systems 96.83 lakh hectares covered under micro-irrigation

Other Programmes: Atal Bhujal Yojana, Watershed Projects and Recharge

Several programmes outside PMKSY address groundwater and rainfed land. The Atal Bhujal Yojana (Atal Jal), launched on 25 December 2019, was a community-led groundwater management scheme run as a pilot from 1 April 2020 to 15 October 2025 in 8,203 water-stressed gram panchayats of 229 blocks in 80 districts of seven States: Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. These States hold about 37 per cent of India's water-stressed blocks. Its aim was to change community behaviour from consumption to conservation, and it funded check dams, ponds and recharge shafts and promoted micro-irrigation through convergence and incentive funds.

Watershed management is the efficient management and conservation of surface and groundwater within a watershed. It prevents run-off, stores water and recharges groundwater through percolation tanks and recharge wells, and in a broad sense conserves and regenerates all the natural and human resources of the area. Its success depends on community participation. Examples are Haryali, a Central project carried out by gram panchayats; Neeru-Meeru in Andhra Pradesh; and Arvary Pani Sansad in Alwar, Rajasthan. Ralegan Siddhi, a village in Maharashtra, became a model: Its people repaired a leaking percolation tank, which filled the wells below it, and later banned water-intensive sugarcane.

The Jal Shakti Abhiyan, run every year since 2019, brings funds from many schemes together for water harvesting and artificial recharge. Mission Amrit Sarovar had built or revived nearly 69,000 water bodies by December 2025, and the Central Ground Water Board's Master Plan for Artificial Recharge to Groundwater, 2020, outlines about 1.42 crore rainwater harvesting and recharge structures to harness 185 billion cubic metres of water.

Problems of Irrigation in India

Groundwater Depletion and Over-Exploited Assessment Units

Groundwater depletion is the most serious problem of irrigation in India, because the largest source of irrigation draws on it. Agriculture accounts for 92 per cent of groundwater utilisation in the country. The 2025 assessment of the Central Ground Water Board put total annual groundwater recharge at 448.52 billion cubic metres, the annual extractable resource at 407.75 billion cubic metres and annual extraction for all uses at 247.22 billion cubic metres. The national picture hides severe local stress. In 2025, Punjab extracted 26.27 billion cubic metres against an extractable resource of 16.80 billion cubic metres, Haryana 12.72 against 9.30, and Rajasthan 17.10 against 11.62, so these States draw more each year than their annual extractable resource.

Groundwater assessment units, such as blocks, are classed as safe, semi-critical, critical or over-exploited by their level of extraction. The share of over-exploited units fell from 17.2 per cent in 2017 to 10.8 per cent in 2025, and the share of safe units rose from 62.6 per cent to 73.14 per cent, as recharge rose from 432 to 448.52 billion cubic metres. The Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA), which was constituted under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, monitors and regulates groundwater extraction, and several States, including Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Punjab, have their own groundwater laws.

The causes reinforce one another:

  • Cheap power: With free or cheap electricity, pumping costs the farmer little, so extraction runs ahead of recharge.
  • Water-hungry crops: Rice and sugarcane are grown where rainfall cannot support them, and in the north-west rice and wheat follow each other on the same fields every year.
  • Weak aquifers: The hard-rock aquifers of the Peninsula need deeper drilling and give variable yields, and the desert aquifers of Rajasthan recharge slowly, so pumping soon outruns recharge.
  • Loss of surface storage: Silted tanks hold less monsoon water, which leaves farmers more dependent on wells and borewells.

Over-pumping harms water quality as well as quantity. Over-withdrawal has raised fluoride concentration in groundwater in parts of Rajasthan and Maharashtra and arsenic concentration in parts of West Bengal and Bihar. As the water table falls, wells dry up and farmers drill ever deeper borewells.

The Ganga plain shows what is at stake. Uttar Pradesh and Bihar extracted 46.89 and 14.47 billion cubic metres of groundwater in 2025, and wheat and rice there are grown mainly with the help of irrigation, so a falling water table in the Gangetic plain would cut both the rabi harvest and the double cropping on which India's food security rests.

Paired bar chart for 2025 in billion cubic metres, annual extraction for all uses against the annual extractable resource: Punjab 26.27 against 16.80; Rajasthan 17.10 against 11.62; Haryana 12.72 against 9.30; Tamil Nadu 15.04 against 20.46; Uttar Pradesh 46.89 against 66.97; Karnataka 11.58 against 17.41; Madhya Pradesh 20.26 against 34.15; Gujarat 14.33 against 25.61; Bihar 14.47 against 31.32. Punjab, Rajasthan and Haryana extract more than their annual extractable resource.

Waterlogging, Salinisation and Alkalinity in Canal Commands

Waterlogging is the saturation of soil with water for much of the time, so that air cannot reach plant roots. In irrigated land it is common where heavy watering meets poor drainage, and it usually comes with salinity, because waterlogged soil prevents the leaching of the salts that irrigation water brings in. Most crops except rice cannot tolerate it.

Salinisation is the build-up of salts in the soil. Almost all irrigation water carries some dissolved salts, which stay behind in the root zone when plants take up water. In drylands with saline groundwater, when the water table lies within about two to three metres of the surface in clayey soils, salts in the groundwater rise by capillary action and collect at the surface as the water evaporates.

Where sodium dominates, an alkaline (sodic) soil forms; this is alkalisation. Its structure breaks down, and water can scarcely infiltrate or drain through it. A large tract of irrigated land in India has lost its fertility in this way, through waterlogging, salinisation and alkalisation, particularly in the intensively irrigated plains of Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh. The shift to water-intensive commercial crops in canal commands has added to the problem, and leguminous crops that once restored soil nitrogen have been displaced from the irrigated cropping pattern.

The remedy lies in leaching salts out of the root zone with good-quality water, together with drainage that keeps the water table down; gypsum is the most common compound used to reclaim sodic soil.

Inefficiency, Monsoon Dependence and Unfinished Projects

Irrigation in India also suffers from problems of management. The gap between the irrigation potential created by projects and the potential actually used is a long-standing problem, which is why command area development was begun in 1974‑75 and AIBP was created in 1996‑97 to finish projects already under way. Canal systems themselves depend on the monsoon. A poor south-west monsoon reduces the water in reservoirs and canals just when farmers need it most. Large dams have also come under scrutiny, because they alter the natural flow of rivers, trap sediment in their reservoirs and submerge vegetation and soil.

Lift schemes and tube-wells also tie irrigation to energy, because the irrigation potential they create depends on a reliable supply of electricity for the pumps and on their maintenance.

Inter-State River Water Disputes: Constitution and Tribunals

Inter-State river water disputes arise because rivers cross State boundaries while water is a State subject. Water, including water supplies, irrigation and canals, is Entry 17 of the State List, but this is subject to Entry 56 of the Union List, which gives the Union the regulation and development of inter-State rivers and river valleys to the extent Parliament declares by law to be expedient in the public interest. Article 262 of the Constitution empowers Parliament to provide by law for the adjudication of any dispute over the use, distribution or control of the waters of an inter-State river, and to exclude the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and other courts over such a dispute.

The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, was enacted under Article 262 and last amended in 2002. Nine tribunals have been set up under it. The decisions of five, the first Krishna, Godavari, Narmada, Kaveri and Mahadayi tribunals, are published in the Official Gazette and binding on the States. The decisions of the Ravi-Beas, the second Krishna and the Vansadhara tribunals have not been notified and are not yet effective, and the Mahanadi tribunal is still hearing its dispute. The Krishna-Godavari dispute, for example, arose from the objections of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh to Maharashtra's plan to divert more water at Koyna for a multipurpose project, which would reduce the flow downstream for their agriculture and industry.

Sustainable Irrigation Management: Recharge, Efficiency and Crop Choice

Measures for Efficient Irrigation and Groundwater Recharge

Efficient irrigation in India rests on using less water for each crop, putting water back into the ground and managing the system with the people who use it.

  • Raising efficiency: Drip and sprinkler systems under Per Drop More Crop and piped delivery under M‑CADWM cut losses between the source and the root.
  • Completing and using projects: AIBP finishes ongoing projects, and command area development helps turn the potential created into irrigated land.
  • Recharging aquifers: Rainwater harvesting, check dams, percolation tanks and the revival of tanks under Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Water Bodies, Mission Amrit Sarovar and the Jal Shakti Abhiyan return monsoon water to the ground.
  • Mapping and monitoring groundwater: Aquifer mapping, now in its second phase on water-stressed and quality-affected pockets, and monitoring by the CGWA give planners detailed data.
  • Managing with communities: Water User Societies under Irrigation Management Transfer, community-led groundwater management of the kind Atal Jal piloted in seven States, and watershed projects run by gram panchayats give farmers a share in decisions.
  • Pricing and crop choice: Pricing irrigation water encourages its efficient use, and replacing water-intensive crops such as sugarcane with pulses and oilseeds, as Ralegan Siddhi did, lowers demand.
  • Reusing water: Treated municipal wastewater can irrigate peri-urban fields.
  • Conjunctive use: Drawing on canal water and groundwater together, each when the other is short, keeps the water table from rising in canal commands and from falling outside them.

The National Water Policy, 2012, set the direction for these measures. It called for a national framework law and comprehensive legislation for inter-State rivers, recommended treating water as an economic good after the pre-emptive needs for safe drinking water, sanitation and food security are met, asked for benchmarks such as water footprints and water auditing, and stressed adaptation to climate change and community participation in managing water projects.

Previous Year UPSC‑CSE Questions

Each Prelims question is explained option by option, and each Mains question comes with an answer outline.

  1. UPSC Prelims 2025The irrigation device called 'Araghatta' was
    1. a a water bag made of leather pulled over a pulley
    2. b a large wheel with earthen pots tied to the outer ends of its spokes
    3. c a larger earthen pot driven by bullocks
    4. d a large water bucket pulled up by rope directly by hand
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: The question asks which description fits the araghatta, so match each option with what the word itself describes. The word combines ara, a spoke or spoked wheel, and ghatta, a pot, so the device must be a wheel that carries pots. Only one option describes a wheel; the others describe a bag, a single pot or a bucket. The araghatta was turned by oxen or people and lifted water from a well with the pots fixed to its rim.

    Trap to watch: Students who remember only that bullocks worked the device pick option (c); the defining feature is the wheel with many pots, not the animal that turned it.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) a water bag made of leather pulled over a pulley: Wrong. A single bag on a pulley has no wheel of pots, which is what the word araghatta names.
    • (b) a large wheel with earthen pots tied to the outer ends of its spokes: Correct. Ara means a spoke or spoked wheel and ghatta a pot, and the device lifted water by a wheel carrying pots.
    • (c) a larger earthen pot driven by bullocks: Wrong. The araghatta uses many pots on a wheel, not one large pot.
    • (d) a large water bucket pulled up by rope directly by hand: Wrong. A bucket drawn by hand needs no wheel, so it is not the araghatta.

    Answer: (b) a large wheel with earthen pots tied to the outer ends of its spokes. The araghatta was a wheel with earthen pots fixed to its rim, the device also called the Persian wheel.

  2. UPSC Prelims 2020Consider the following statements:
    1. 36% of India's districts are classified as "overexploited" or "critical" by the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA).
    2. CGWA was formed under the Environment (Protection) Act.
    3. India has the largest area under groundwater irrigation in the world.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 2 and 3 only
    3. c 2 only
    4. d 1 and 3 only
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Separate the body that assesses groundwater from the body that monitors it, then check the global comparison.

    • Statement 1: Groundwater categories are assigned to assessment units such as blocks in the dynamic assessments of the Central Ground Water Board, not to districts by the CGWA, and the share of over-exploited units was 17.2 per cent in 2017; wrong.
    • Statement 2: The CGWA, which monitors groundwater extraction, was constituted under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; correct.
    • Statement 3: India has the world's largest area irrigated from groundwater wells, ahead of China and the United States; correct.

    Trap to watch: Students who remember that many blocks are stressed pick option (d); the categories are given to assessment units by the Central Ground Water Board's assessments, not to districts by the CGWA.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 only: Wrong. Statement 1 is wrong, and statements 2 and 3 are correct.
    • (b) 2 and 3 only: Correct. The CGWA was constituted under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and India has the world's largest area irrigated from groundwater wells.
    • (c) 2 only: Wrong. Statement 3 is also correct.
    • (d) 1 and 3 only: Wrong. Statement 1 misstates both the classifying body and the unit of classification.

    Answer: (b) 2 and 3 only. The CGWA was constituted under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and India has the world's largest area irrigated from groundwater wells.

  3. UPSC Prelims 2016Which of the following is/are the advantage/advantages of practising drip irrigation?
    1. Reduction in weed
    2. Reduction in soil salinity
    3. Reduction in soil erosion

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    1. a 1 and 2 only
    2. b 3 only
    3. c 1 and 3 only
    4. d None of the above is an advantage of practising drip irrigation
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Select from a list

    Approach: Check each claimed advantage against how drip irrigation wets the soil.

    • Reduction in weed: Only the soil around each plant is wetted, so weeds between plants get little water; correct.
    • Reduction in soil salinity: Drip applies so little water that salts brought in with it are not leached and can build up at the edge of the wetted patch; wrong.
    • Reduction in soil erosion: No water runs over the surface, so soil is not washed away; correct.

    Trap to watch: Students who think of drip as saving water in saline areas pick option (a); with little leaching, salts can accumulate in the root zone.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 and 2 only: Wrong. Drip irrigation does not reduce soil salinity, because salts can collect at the edge of the wetted zone.
    • (b) 3 only: Wrong. Reduction in weeds is also an advantage, since the ground between plants stays dry.
    • (c) 1 and 3 only: Correct. Drip irrigation lessens weed growth and soil erosion.
    • (d) None of the above is an advantage of practising drip irrigation: Wrong. Weed and erosion control are recognised advantages.

    Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only. Drip irrigation reduces weed growth and soil erosion, but it does not by itself reduce soil salinity.

  4. UPSC Prelims 2015Consider the following statements:
    1. The Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme was launched during 1996‑97 to provide loan assistance to poor farmers.
    2. The Command Area Development Programme was launched in 1974‑75 for the development of water-use efficiency.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 2 only
    3. c Both 1 and 2
    4. d Neither 1 nor 2
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Check each programme's year and purpose separately, because a statement can have the right year and the wrong purpose.

    • Statement 1: AIBP did begin in 1996‑97, but it gave assistance to the States, by way of loans on a matching basis, to complete selected large irrigation and multipurpose projects, not loans to poor farmers; wrong.
    • Statement 2: The Command Area Development Programme has been in place since 1974‑75 to close the gap between irrigation potential created and used and to raise productivity in command areas, which is the efficient use of irrigation water; correct.

    Trap to watch: Students who recognise the correct year 1996‑97 pick option (c); the statement fails on its purpose, because AIBP assistance went to the States for projects, not to poor farmers.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 only: Wrong. AIBP assisted the States in completing irrigation projects; it did not lend to farmers.
    • (b) 2 only: Correct. The Command Area Development Programme dates to 1974‑75 and aims at better use of irrigation water in project commands.
    • (c) Both 1 and 2: Wrong. Statement 1 gives the wrong beneficiary for AIBP.
    • (d) Neither 1 nor 2: Wrong. Statement 2 is correct.

    Answer: (b) 2 only. AIBP helped States finish irrigation projects, while the Command Area Development Programme of 1974‑75 aims at fuller and more efficient use of irrigation water.

  5. UPSC Prelims 2014What are the benefits of implementing the 'Integrated Watershed Development Programme'?
    1. Prevention of soil runoff
    2. Linking the country's perennial rivers with seasonal rivers
    3. Rainwater harvesting and recharge of groundwater table
    4. Regeneration of natural vegetation

    Select the correct answer using the code given below.

    1. a 1 and 2 only
    2. b 2, 3 and 4 only
    3. c 1, 3 and 4 only
    4. d 1, 2, 3 and 4
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Select from a list

    Approach: Judge each benefit by the scale at which watershed work operates, a single catchment managed with the local community.

    • Soil runoff: Watershed management prevents run-off; correct.
    • River linking: Joining perennial rivers with seasonal ones is inter-basin transfer, far beyond a watershed; wrong.
    • Rainwater harvesting: Watershed work stores water and recharges groundwater through percolation tanks and recharge wells; correct.
    • Natural vegetation: It conserves and regenerates plants and other natural resources of the watershed; correct.

    Trap to watch: Students who read every water-related benefit as correct pick option (d); linking rivers transfers water between basins and is not a watershed activity.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 and 2 only: Wrong. River linking is not a watershed benefit, and statements 3 and 4 are left out.
    • (b) 2, 3 and 4 only: Wrong. It includes river linking and leaves out the prevention of run-off.
    • (c) 1, 3 and 4 only: Correct. Watershed development checks run-off, harvests rainwater and recharges groundwater, and regenerates vegetation.
    • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4: Wrong. Linking perennial and seasonal rivers belongs to river interlinking, not to watershed development.

    Answer: (c) 1, 3 and 4 only. Watershed development prevents run-off, harvests rainwater, recharges groundwater and regenerates vegetation, but does not link rivers.

  6. UPSC Prelims 2011With reference to micro-irrigation, which of the following statements is/are correct?
    1. Fertilizer/nutrient loss can be reduced.
    2. It is the only means of irrigation in dry land farming.
    3. In some areas of farming, receding of ground water table can be checked.

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 2 and 3 only
    3. c 1 and 3 only
    4. d 1, 2 and 3
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Test each statement against what micro-irrigation does in the field, and watch for the absolute word "only".

    • Statement 1: Fertiliser is applied with the water to the root zone through fertigation, so less is lost; correct.
    • Statement 2: Dryland farming relies mainly on hardy, drought-resistant crops, soil moisture conservation and rainwater harvesting, so micro-irrigation is not the only means; wrong.
    • Statement 3: Because drip and sprinkler systems use less water, farmers who adopt them can pump less, which helps check a falling water table; correct.

    Trap to watch: Students who link drip irrigation with dry areas pick option (d); the word "only" in statement 2 makes it wrong.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 only: Wrong. Statement 3 is also correct, because micro-irrigation reduces groundwater pumping.
    • (b) 2 and 3 only: Wrong. Statement 2 is wrong, since dryland farming also relies on soil moisture conservation and rainwater harvesting.
    • (c) 1 and 3 only: Correct. Micro-irrigation cuts fertiliser loss through fertigation and helps check the fall of the water table.
    • (d) 1, 2 and 3: Wrong. Statement 2 claims micro-irrigation is the only means of dryland irrigation, which is not true.

    Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only. Micro-irrigation reduces nutrient loss and can slow the fall of the water table, but it is not the only means of irrigating drylands.

  7. UPSC Prelims 2011Salinization occurs when the irrigation water accumulated in the soil evaporates, leaving behind salts and minerals. What are the effects of salinization on the irrigated land?
    1. a It greatly increases the crop production
    2. b It makes some soils impermeable
    3. c It raises the water table
    4. d It fills the air spaces in the soil with water
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: The stem asks for an effect of salt build-up, so reject options that describe a cause or a different process. Salinisation lowers fertility rather than raising output, which rules out (a). A rising water table is a cause of salinisation in canal commands, not its effect, which rules out (c). Air spaces filled with water describe waterlogging, which rules out (d). When sodium salts dominate, the soil loses its structure and water can scarcely infiltrate or drain, so some soils become impermeable.

    Trap to watch: Students who link salinity with canal irrigation pick option (c); a rising water table is the cause of salinisation in canal commands, not its effect.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) It greatly increases the crop production: Wrong. Salinisation is a form of land degradation that lowers fertility and yields.
    • (b) It makes some soils impermeable: Correct. Sodic soils have a poor structure that limits or prevents the infiltration and drainage of water.
    • (c) It raises the water table: Wrong. A high water table helps cause salinisation through capillary rise; salinisation does not raise it.
    • (d) It fills the air spaces in the soil with water: Wrong. That describes waterlogging, the saturation of soil with water.

    Answer: (b) It makes some soils impermeable. Salt build-up, especially of sodium, breaks down soil structure so that water cannot pass through some soils.

  8. UPSC Mains 2025 GS‑IIIExamine the factors responsible for depleting groundwater in India. What are the steps taken by the government to mitigate such depletion of groundwater?
    Answer outline

    The outline sets out what the question asks, the main arguments, relevant examples and the direction of the conclusion; it is not a full model answer.

    Directive verb: Examine

    Approach: Examine the causes of depletion, then list the government's steps.

    Introduction: Tube-wells and other wells irrigated about 63 per cent of India's net irrigated area in 2023‑24, and agriculture accounts for 92 per cent of groundwater utilisation.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Power: Cheap or free electricity for farm pumps removes the cost of pumping.
    • Crops: Water-intensive cropping such as rice-wheat and sugarcane in dry regions.
    • Aquifers: Slow recharge of hard-rock and desert aquifers and the loss of tanks and ponds.
    • Result: Punjab extracted 26.27 billion cubic metres against an extractable resource of 16.80 in 2025.
    • Regulation: Assessment by the Central Ground Water Board, monitoring by the CGWA under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and State groundwater laws.
    • Programmes: Atal Bhujal Yojana in 80 districts of seven States, Jal Shakti Abhiyan, Mission Amrit Sarovar, aquifer mapping in its second phase, the Master Plan for Artificial Recharge, 2020, and Per Drop More Crop.

    Conclusion: The share of over-exploited units fell from 17.2 per cent in 2017 to 10.8 per cent in 2025, but the north-west remains over-drawn, so recharge must go with crop diversification.

  9. UPSC Mains 2024 GS‑IIIWhat are the major challenges faced by Indian irrigation system in recent times? State the measures taken by the government for efficient irrigation management.
    Answer outline

    Directive verb: State

    Approach: Set out the main challenges, then state the government's measures, each tied to a scheme.

    Introduction: India irrigated 59.30 per cent of its net sown area in 2023‑24, with tube-wells supplying about 48 per cent of the net irrigated area.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Groundwater: Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan extracted more than their annual extractable resource in 2025.
    • Land: Waterlogging, salinisation and alkalinity in canal commands where drainage is poor.
    • Systems: Unused potential of large projects, dependence of canal water on the monsoon and wasteful flood irrigation.
    • Governance: The decline of tanks and inter-State disputes over river water.
    • PMKSY: AIBP for project completion, Har Khet Ko Pani for minor irrigation and command area development, and the Watershed Development Component.
    • Efficiency: Per Drop More Crop for micro-irrigation and M‑CADWM for piped delivery and Water User Societies.
    • Groundwater programmes: Atal Bhujal Yojana, Jal Shakti Abhiyan, Mission Amrit Sarovar and aquifer mapping.

    Conclusion: Irrigation management is shifting from building new capacity to using water efficiently and recharging aquifers, with communities sharing the work.

  10. UPSC Mains 2024 GS‑IThe groundwater potential of the gangetic valley is on a serious decline. How may it affect the food security of India?
    Answer outline

    Directive verb: None (a how question)

    Approach: Show how falling groundwater in the Ganga valley would reach grain output and food security.

    Introduction: The alluvial Ganga valley holds rich aquifers that tube-wells tap; Uttar Pradesh irrigated 9,797 of its 13,656 thousand hectares from tube-wells in 2023‑24.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Crops: Cereals and millets take about 58 per cent of the irrigated crop area, and in Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh wheat and rice are grown largely under irrigation.
    • Wells: A falling water table dries wells and pushes farmers to drill ever deeper borewells.
    • Cropping: Loss of groundwater would cut the second, irrigated crop, lowering cropping intensity and grain output.
    • Quality: Over-withdrawal raises arsenic in parts of West Bengal and Bihar.
    • Scale: Uttar Pradesh and Bihar extracted 46.89 and 14.47 billion cubic metres of groundwater in 2025.

    Conclusion: Food security in the Ganga valley needs recharge, efficient irrigation and crop diversification so that the aquifer can sustain the rice-wheat system.

  11. UPSC Mains 2021 GS‑IIIHow and to what extent would micro-irrigation help in solving India's water crisis?
    Answer outline

    Directive verb: None (a how and to what extent question)

    Approach: Explain how micro-irrigation saves water, then weigh the extent of its reach.

    Introduction: Agriculture accounts for 92 per cent of groundwater utilisation in India, so the water crisis is largely an irrigation crisis.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • How it helps: Drip and sprinkler systems cut evaporation and run-off losses, apply water and fertiliser at the root, and reduce pumping where groundwater is falling.
    • Spread: Over 115 lakh hectares had come under micro-irrigation by July 2026; Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Rajasthan covered the largest areas in 2025‑26.
    • Extent: Coverage is about 8.11 per cent of the net sown area, so most land is still flood-irrigated or rainfed.
    • Limits: High cost, clogging, salt build-up in the root zone and the use of saved water to expand cropping reduce the gains.
    • What else is needed: Over-exploited aquifers in Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan need recharge and crop diversification along with micro-irrigation.

    Conclusion: Micro-irrigation can ease India's water crisis substantially, but only as one part of a package of recharge, crop choice and groundwater regulation.

  12. UPSC Mains 2016 GS‑IIIWhat is water-use efficiency? Describe the role of micro-irrigation in increasing the water-use efficiency.
    Answer outline

    Directive verb: Describe

    Approach: Define water-use efficiency, then describe how micro-irrigation raises it, with evidence and limits.

    Introduction: Water-use efficiency is, at its simplest, the ratio of crop produced to the water used; flood irrigation loses much of its water to evaporation and deep drainage.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Delivery: Drip irrigation delivers water slowly to the root zone through emitters, and sprinkler irrigation sprays it like rain over closely planted crops.
    • Evidence: Micro-irrigation saves 20 to 48 per cent of water and raises yields by 20 to 38 per cent, and an evaluation of Per Drop More Crop found water-use efficiency 30 to 70 per cent higher.
    • Inputs: Fertigation applies fertiliser with the water, and drip also lessens weeds and soil erosion.
    • Support: Per Drop More Crop meets 55 per cent of the cost for small and marginal farmers and 45 per cent for others, and had covered over 115 lakh hectares by July 2026.

    Conclusion: Micro-irrigation raises water-use efficiency most where the saved water stays in the aquifer, which needs crop choice and groundwater regulation alongside the subsidy.

Sources

Editorial Disclaimer

This article draws on the Land Use Statistics at a Glance, the latest groundwater assessment placed before the Lok Sabha, the current NCERT textbooks and the other sources listed above.

See more of our UPSC articles in Google Search

Add to Preferred Sources

More on Indian Agriculture

All articles on Indian Agriculture