Skip to content

UPSC Mains 2025 · General Studies Paper IV (Ethics)

UPSC Mains 2025 GS Paper 4 Ethics Questions and Case Studies with Answer Frameworks

All 12 questions of General Studies Paper IV (Ethics), UPSC Mains 2025, held on 24 August 2025, 13 short parts and 6 case studies in all, each with an answer framework that shows what the question asks, a strong opening, the points to cover and a balanced conclusion.

  • 24 August 2025Exam date
  • 12Questions (19 answers)
  • 250Marks
  • 3 hoursTime
GS Paper 4 in other years:202620252024

UPSC Mains 2025 GS Paper 4 Ethics Questions and Case Studies

GS IV Q1(a)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

In the present digital age, social media has revolutionised our way of communication and interaction. However, it has raised several ethical issues and challenges. Describe the key ethical dilemmas in this regard.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Describe Give the main features in an orderly account.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Frame each dilemma as two values in conflict (free speech against harm, privacy against convenience).

What the question asks

Describe the main ethical dilemmas that social media has created in the digital age, for individuals, platforms and the State.

A strong opening

Social media lets anyone speak to millions instantly, which has widened free expression and participation. The same reach and anonymity create clashes between values that were easier to balance offline.

Points to cover

Key ethical dilemmas

  • Free speech against harm: Hate speech, misinformation and incitement spread faster than corrections; removing them risks censorship.
  • Privacy against convenience: Free services are paid for with personal data, often without informed consent.
  • Anonymity against accountability: Anonymity protects whistle-blowers but also trolls and fraudsters.
  • Engagement against well-being: Algorithms that maximise attention can feed addiction, polarisation and harm to children's mental health.
  • Truth against virality: Deepfakes and manipulated media blur what is real.
  • Public servants: Personal expression against the duty of neutrality and confidentiality.

Ethical way forward

  • Platforms: Transparency in algorithms, quick grievance redress, safety by design.
  • Users: Digital literacy, empathy and responsibility before sharing.
  • State: Proportionate, rights-respecting regulation rather than blanket bans.
A balanced conclusion

Social media magnifies both the best and worst of human conduct. Its ethics rest on shared responsibility among platforms, users and the State.

GS IV Q1(b)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

"Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment but a product of civil education and adherance of the rule of law." Examine the significance of constitutional morality for public servant highlighting the role in promoting good governance and ensuring accountability in public administration.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Examine Probe the issue in depth: Causes, evidence and consequences.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Open with Ambedkar's 'cultivated' line, then link it to governance and to accountability separately.

What the question asks

Examine why constitutional morality matters for public servants, and how it promotes good governance and accountability in public administration.

A strong opening

B. R. Ambedkar warned that constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment and has to be cultivated. The Supreme Court in 2018 called it the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon high functionaries and citizens alike.

Points to cover

Meaning for a public servant

  • Loyalty to the Constitution's values (justice, liberty, equality, fraternity, the rule of law) above personal, political or group loyalties.
  • Using discretion for the purposes the law intends, and respecting the limits of one's authority.

Role in good governance

  • Impartial service to all citizens, especially the weak, which builds trust in the State.
  • Respect for due process, reasons for decisions and fairness in implementation.

Role in accountability

  • Accepting scrutiny by courts, legislatures, audit, RTI and citizens as part of the job.
  • Refusing illegal orders and reporting wrongdoing through proper channels.

How it is cultivated

  • Civic education, training in constitutional values, codes of conduct and leaders who model the behaviour.
A balanced conclusion

Laws set the minimum; constitutional morality supplies the spirit in which public servants apply them. It is the inner check that makes accountability real.

Sources: Supreme Court of India: Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India, 4 July 2018

GS IV Q2(a)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

Carl von Clausewitz once said, "War is a diplomacy by other means." Critically analyse the above statement in the present context of contemporary geo-political conflict.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Critically analyse Break the issue into parts, test each, and conclude with your view.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Correct the quote politely (Clausewitz said 'policy'), then test it against today's wars.

What the question asks

Critically analyse the statement, attributed to Clausewitz, that war is diplomacy by other means, in the light of today's geopolitical conflicts; examine what it gets right and its ethical limits.

A strong opening

Carl von Clausewitz's best-known aphorism is that war is the continuation of policy by other means: Force serves political aims and remains subordinate to them. The question's wording ('diplomacy') captures the same idea that war and politics are linked.

Points to cover

Where the idea holds today

  • States still use force to pursue political goals and then return to negotiation, as in the Russia-Ukraine war since 2022 and conflicts in West Asia.
  • Coercion now extends to sanctions, cyber attacks, energy cut-offs and information warfare, which blur war and diplomacy.

Where it falls short

  • Nuclear weapons make total war irrational; deterrence, not use, is their role.
  • Non-State actors and terrorism do not fit a model of rational state policy.
  • International law (the UN Charter's ban on the use of force, international humanitarian law) treats war as a failure, not a normal tool.

Ethical view

  • Just war ideas require a just cause, last resort, proportionality and protection of civilians; seeing war as routine policy can lower the threshold for violence.
  • India's stated position, repeated on 12 May 2025, is that this is not an era of war, but it is not an era of terrorism either: Dialogue first, with firmness against terror.
A balanced conclusion

Clausewitz explains why states fight, but not whether they should. In a nuclear and interdependent world, ethics and law push war back towards being the last resort.

Sources: Carl von Clausewitz (Wikipedia); PIB: Prime Minister addresses the nation (12 May 2025)

GS IV Q2(b)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

Keeping the national security in mind, examine the ethical dilemmas related to controversies over environmental clearance of development projects in ecologically sensitive border areas in the country.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Examine Probe the issue in depth: Causes, evidence and consequences.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Name the competing values (security, ecology, transparency) and propose safeguards, not a choice of one.

What the question asks

Examine the ethical dilemmas that arise when development projects in ecologically sensitive border areas need environmental clearance, with national security as a key consideration.

A strong opening

Roads, tunnels, airfields and other infrastructure in the Himalaya and island territories serve defence and connectivity, but these areas are also fragile and biodiverse. In 2023 the forest conservation law was amended to exempt strategic projects concerning national security within 100 km of the international borders, the Line of Actual Control and the Line of Control.

Points to cover

The ethical dilemmas

  • National security against ecological integrity: Speed of construction against landslides, glacier and river damage and habitat loss.
  • Utilitarian benefit to the nation against harm to local communities and future generations (intergenerational equity).
  • Secrecy against transparency: Security can limit public consultation and scrutiny of environmental impact.
  • Rule of law: Exemptions can be seen as bypassing safeguards that apply to everyone else.

Balancing the claims

  • Security is a legitimate public good, but sustainable design (slope stabilisation, tunnels instead of cuts, waste disposal) reduces harm.
  • Independent expert review, even if confidential, and monitoring after construction.
  • Involving local communities and compensating losses.
A balanced conclusion

National security and environmental protection both serve the nation's long-term interest. Ethical governance seeks the least harmful way to build what security truly requires.

Sources: PIB: Lok Sabha passes the Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill 2023

GS IV Q3(a)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

Given below are three quotations of great thinkers. What do each of these quotations convey to you in the present context? "Those who in trouble untroubled are, Will trouble trouble itself." – Thiruvalluvar

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Explain the quote in one line, then give a civil-service example of calm in a crisis.

What the question asks

Explain what Thiruvalluvar's line, that those who remain untroubled in trouble will trouble trouble itself, conveys today.

A strong opening

The couplet from the Tirukkural says that a calm mind defeats adversity: Equanimity in difficulty turns the tables on the difficulty.

Points to cover

What it conveys

  • Resilience and emotional stability: Staying composed allows clear thinking when crises strike.
  • Courage and optimism: Problems lose their power over those who face them calmly.

In the present context

  • For a civil servant handling a disaster or a law-and-order crisis, calm leadership steadies the whole team and the public.
  • For students and workers under pressure, equanimity guards against anxiety and burnout.
  • Emotional intelligence, the ability to manage one's own emotions, is now seen as central to leadership.
A balanced conclusion

Thiruvalluvar's lesson is that composure is a strength, not indifference. It remains a core value for anyone who must act under pressure.

GS IV Q3(b)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

Given below are three quotations of great thinkers. What do each of these quotations convey to you in the present context? "The greatest discovery of my generation is that a human being can alter his life by altering his attitudes." – William James

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Pair the idea of attitude with one public example and one personal example.

What the question asks

Explain what William James means by saying that a person can change their life by changing their attitudes, and its relevance today.

A strong opening

The psychologist William James saw attitude, the way we interpret and respond to events, as within our control. Changing it changes behaviour, and behaviour shapes outcomes.

Points to cover

What it conveys

  • Agency: People are not prisoners of circumstance; outlook shapes effort and persistence.
  • Growth mindset: Seeing failure as learning rather than defeat.

In the present context

  • Public service: A service-oriented, citizen-first attitude transforms how schemes reach people.
  • Social change: Campaigns such as Swachh Bharat show that changed attitudes change public behaviour.
  • Personal well-being: Gratitude and optimism improve mental health and relationships.

A caution

  • Attitude matters, but structural barriers such as poverty and discrimination also need policy, not only personal effort.
A balanced conclusion

Attitude is the lever an individual always holds. Changing it is often the first step to changing one's life and one's institution.

GS IV Q3(c)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

Given below are three quotations of great thinkers. What do each of these quotations convey to you in the present context? "The strength of a society is not in its laws, but in the morality of its people." – Swami Vivekananda

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Agree, but add that laws remain needed to protect the weak.

What the question asks

Explain Swami Vivekananda's view that a society's strength lies in the morality of its people rather than in its laws, and its relevance today.

A strong opening

Laws set rules and penalties, but they work only when most people obey them willingly. Vivekananda's point is that character, not compulsion, holds a society together.

Points to cover

What it conveys

  • Laws are external controls; morality is internal and works even when no one is watching.
  • Too many laws with weak morality breed evasion and corruption.

In the present context

  • Strong anti-corruption laws exist, yet integrity in public life depends on individual conduct.
  • Social reform (against dowry or untouchability) succeeds when attitudes change, not only when laws are passed.
  • Civic sense, honesty in tax, and respect for others' rights reduce the need for enforcement.

Balance

  • Laws remain necessary to protect the weak and set standards; ideally they codify the community's morality.
A balanced conclusion

Laws are the frame, but morality is the foundation. Building character through education and example is the surest way to a strong society.

GS IV Q4(a)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

"For any kind of social re-engineering by successfully implementing welfare schemes, a civil servant must use reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework." Justify this statement with suitable examples.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Justify Give reasons and evidence that support the position asked for.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Give one example where reason fixed a scheme and one where ethics prevented exclusion.

What the question asks

Justify, with examples, why a civil servant needs reason and critical thinking within an ethical framework to bring about social change through welfare schemes.

A strong opening

Welfare schemes aim to change social conditions: Health, education, sanitation, gender roles. Good intentions are not enough; schemes succeed when officials think critically about design and delivery and keep ethical aims in view.

Points to cover

Why reason and critical thinking

  • To identify the right beneficiaries and causes of failure using data, not assumptions.
  • To adapt schemes to local conditions and spot unintended effects (exclusion errors, leakages).
  • Example: Using evidence on why households did not use toilets led to behaviour-change campaigns, not just construction.

Why an ethical framework

  • Reason without ethics can treat people as numbers; ethics keeps dignity, fairness and compassion central.
  • Example: Insisting on biometric authentication without fallbacks can exclude the elderly and disabled; ethical judgement provides alternatives.

How the two combine

  • Evidence-based targeting, transparency (social audits), grievance redress and empathy towards the marginalised.
A balanced conclusion

Social re-engineering needs both a clear head and a good heart. Reasoned, ethical administration turns schemes into real change.

GS IV Q4(b)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

What are the major teachings of Mahavir? Explain their relevance in the contemporary world.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Explain Say what it is and why or how it happens, step by step.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: List the five vows and anekantavada, then give each a present-day use.

What the question asks

State the main teachings of Mahavira and explain their relevance in today's world.

A strong opening

Vardhamana Mahavira, the 24th Tirthankara of Jainism, taught that liberation comes through right conduct and self-discipline.

Points to cover

Major teachings

  • Five vows: Ahimsa (non-violence), satya (truth), asteya (non-stealing), brahmacharya (chastity) and aparigraha (non-attachment).
  • Anekantavada, the doctrine of many-sidedness: Reality is complex and every view captures only part of the truth.
  • Right faith, right knowledge and right conduct as the path to liberation.

Relevance today

  • Ahimsa: Non-violence in conflict resolution, compassion for animals and the environment.
  • Aparigraha: Limiting possessions counters consumerism and supports sustainable living.
  • Anekantavada: Tolerance and dialogue in a polarised world; seeing an issue from many sides.
  • Satya and asteya: Honesty and integrity in public life and business.
A balanced conclusion

Mahavira's ethics of restraint, truth and many-sided thinking speak directly to today's conflicts, consumerism and intolerance.

Sources: Mahavira (Wikipedia); Anekantavada (Wikipedia)

GS IV Q5(a)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

"One who is devoted to one's duty attains highest perfection in life." Analyse this statement with reference to sense of responsibility and personal fulfilment as a civil servant.

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Analyse Break the topic into its parts and explain how they connect.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Link duty to responsibility and to fulfilment, and add the caution against blind obedience.

What the question asks

Analyse the idea that devotion to one's duty leads to the highest perfection, with reference to a civil servant's sense of responsibility and personal fulfilment.

A strong opening

The thought echoes the Bhagavad Gita's teaching that a person attains perfection by being devoted to one's own duty, performed without attachment to its fruits (nishkama karma).

Points to cover

Duty and responsibility

  • A civil servant's duty is defined by law and the Constitution; devotion means doing it fully, fairly and on time, even when unseen.
  • Responsibility includes owning outcomes, not just following procedure.

Duty and personal fulfilment

  • Meaning comes from service: Seeing a scheme reach a family or a crisis handled well gives deep satisfaction.
  • Detachment from rewards and recognition reduces frustration and temptation.

Cautions

  • Devotion to duty must stay within ethics; blind obedience to illegal orders is not duty.
  • Balance with family and health prevents burnout.
A balanced conclusion

For a civil servant, duty done with devotion and integrity is both public service and personal fulfilment. The two are not opposed but grow together.

GS IV Q5(b)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

To achieve holistic development goal, a civil servant acts as an enabler and active facilitator of growth rather than a regulator. What specific measures will you suggest to achieve this goal?

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Suggest End with practical, specific measures, not general wishes.

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Give specific, practical measures (single window, outreach, partnerships), not general virtues.

What the question asks

Suggest specific measures by which a civil servant can act as an enabler and facilitator of holistic development rather than as a regulator.

A strong opening

Holistic development covers economic growth, social inclusion and environmental care. The old model of the civil servant as gatekeeper and controller is giving way to that of a facilitator who removes obstacles and builds capacity.

Points to cover

Specific measures

  • Simplify: Single-window clearances, self-certification and time-bound services.
  • Use technology: Online services, dashboards and data-driven monitoring.
  • Partner: Work with self-help groups, NGOs, entrepreneurs and local bodies; convergence of schemes.
  • Listen: Regular public hearings, grievance redress and feedback loops.
  • Build capacity: Training for local officials, start-up and MSME support, skill programmes.
  • Be proactive: Reach out to excluded groups rather than wait for applications.

Values needed

  • Empathy, accountability, openness to new ideas and integrity, so facilitation does not become favouritism.
A balanced conclusion

An enabling civil servant measures success by what citizens and enterprises can achieve, not by permissions granted or withheld.

GS IV Q6(a)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

It is said that for an ethical work culture, there must be code of ethics in place in every organisation. To ensure value-based and compliance-based work culture, what suitable measures would you adopt in your work place?

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Separate compliance measures from value measures; examiners look for both.

What the question asks

Describe the measures you would adopt in your workplace to build both a value-based and a compliance-based ethical work culture, with a code of ethics at the centre.

A strong opening

A code of conduct lists what is forbidden; a code of ethics states the values an organisation stands for. An ethical culture needs both: Rules that are enforced and values that are lived.

Points to cover

Compliance-based measures

  • Clear written rules, a code of conduct and procedures for conflicts of interest, gifts and procurement.
  • Regular audits, vigilance and consequences for violations applied without favour.
  • Protected channels for reporting misconduct.

Value-based measures

  • A code of ethics drafted with staff participation so values are owned.
  • Leaders who model integrity; recognising ethical conduct, not only output.
  • Training through real dilemmas and case discussions.
  • Open, respectful communication and fair treatment that builds trust.
A balanced conclusion

Compliance sets the floor and values raise the ceiling. A workplace that combines firm rules with shared values sustains ethical behaviour even under pressure.

GS IV Q6(b)Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers

India is an emerging economic power of the world as it has recently secured the status of fourth largest economy of the world as per IMF projection. However, it has been observed that in some sectors, allocated funds remain either under-utilised or misutilised. What specific measures would you recommend for ensuring accountability in this regard to stop leakages and gaining the status of third largest economy of the world in near future?

10 marks150 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers: Define the concepts, name a thinker, and give a short administrative example.

For this question: Use concrete tools (outcome budgets, PFMS, DBT, social audit) and end on stewardship of public money.

What the question asks

Recommend specific measures to ensure accountability for under-utilised and misused funds in some sectors, to stop leakages as India aims to become the world's third largest economy.

A strong opening

The question notes India's rise to fourth place among economies in IMF projections. Growth depends not only on how much is spent but on how well: Unspent or misused funds delay development and erode trust.

Points to cover

Causes of under-utilisation and misuse

  • Poor planning, delayed releases and year-end rush to spend; weak monitoring; corruption and collusion.

Measures for accountability

  • Outcome budgeting: Link funds to measurable results, not only expenditure.
  • Just-in-time release of funds and real-time tracking through the Public Financial Management System.
  • Direct Benefit Transfer to cut intermediaries.
  • Social audits, third-party evaluation and geo-tagged evidence of works.
  • Fix responsibility: Time-bound action on audit findings and on officials responsible for lapses.
  • Transparency: Publish budgets, releases and progress online for public scrutiny.

Ethical dimension

  • Public money is held in trust; stewardship and integrity must be valued alongside speed.
A balanced conclusion

Plugging leakages is as important as raising spending. Accountable use of public funds is what turns economic size into development.

GS IV Q7Ethics: Case Studies

Vijay was Deputy Commissioner of remote district of Hilly Northern State of the country for the last two years. In the month of August heavy rains lashed the complete state followed by cloud burst in the upper reaches of the said district. The damage was very heavy in the complete state especially in the affected district. The complete road network and telecommunication were disrupted and the buildings were damaged extensively. People's houses have been destroyed and they were forced to stay in open. More than 200 people have been killed and about 5000 were badly injured. The Civil Administration under Vijay got activated and started conducting rescue and relief operations. Temporary shelter camps and hospitals were established to provide shelter and medical facilities to the homeless and injured people. Helicopter services were pressed in, for evacuating sick and old people from remote areas. Vijay got a message from his hometown in Kerala that his mother was seriously sick. After two days Vijay received the unfortunate message that his mother has expired. Vijay has no close relative except one elder sister who was US citizen and staying there for last several years. In the meantime, the situation in the affected district deteriorated further due to resumption of heavy rains after a gap of five days. At the same time, continuous messages were coming on his mobile from his hometown to reach at the earliest for performing last rites of his mother.

  • (a) What are the options available with Vijay?
  • (b) What are the ethical dilemma being faced by Vijay?
  • (c) Critically evaluate and examine each of these options identified by Vijay.
  • (d) Which of the options, do you think, would be most appropriate for Vijay to adopt and why?

20 marks250 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Critically evaluate Weigh merits and demerits, then state your verdict and why.
  • Your view Take a clear position in the first line, then support it.

For Ethics: Case Studies: List stakeholders and issues, weigh two or three options, and recommend one with reasons.

For this question: Answer each part (a) to (d) under its own label; recommend a planned short absence with handover.

What the question asks

Case: A Deputy Commissioner leading disaster relief learns his mother has died far away; identify his options and dilemmas, evaluate each option and recommend the most appropriate one.

A strong opening

Vijay heads the district's response to a cloudburst that has killed over 200 people, while his family duty calls him to perform his mother's last rites. As Deputy Commissioner he also chairs the District Disaster Management Authority, which places the district's response on him.

Points to cover

(a) Options

  • Leave at once for the last rites and hand over charge.
  • Stay until the situation stabilises and skip or delay the last rites.
  • Hand over operations to a competent officer with clear instructions, travel briefly for the rites, stay connected, and return quickly.
  • Ask a relative or community member to perform the rites, and hold a memorial later.

(b) Ethical dilemmas

  • Duty to the public against duty to family; professional responsibility against personal grief.
  • Leadership presence at a critical time against the human need to mourn.

(c) Evaluation of options

  • Leaving at once honours family duty but could weaken coordination when rains resume.
  • Staying throughout puts public duty first but ignores his emotional needs and cultural obligations, and can affect judgement.
  • A structured handover keeps the response running and respects his duty to his mother; it depends on a capable deputy and connectivity.
  • Rites by others relieve the conflict but may leave lasting personal regret.

(d) Most appropriate option

  • First stabilise the immediate response, brief the senior-most officer and inform the State government; then take short leave for the last rites, stay reachable, and return as soon as possible. This balances public duty with compassion for himself, and shows that institutions, not one individual, carry the response.
A balanced conclusion

Good administrators build teams that can carry on in their absence. Vijay can serve both his district and his mother by planning his short absence responsibly.

Sources: Disaster Management Act, 2005 (Wikipedia)

GS IV Q8Ethics: Case Studies

In line with the Directive Principles of State Policy enshrined in the Indian Constitution, the government has a constitutional obligation to ensure basic needs – "Roti, Kapda aur Makan (Food, Clothes and Shelter)" – for the under-privileged. Pursuing this mandate, the district administration proposed clearing a portion of forest land to develop housing for the homeless and economically weaker sections of the society. The proposed land, however, is an ecologically sensitive zone densely populated with age-old trees, medicinal plants and vital biodiversity. Besides, these forests help to regulate micro-climate and rainfalls; provide habitat for wildlife, support soil fertility and prevent land/soil erosion and sustain livelihoods of tribal and nomadic communities. Inspite of the ecological and social costs, the administration argues in favour of the said proposal by highlighting that this very initiative addresses fundamental human rights as a critical welfare priority. Besides, it fulfils the government's duty to uplift and empower the poor through inclusive housing development. Further, these forest areas have become unsafe due to wild-animal threats and recurring human-wild life conflicts. Lastly, clearing forest-zones may help to curb anti-social elements allegedly using these areas as hideouts, thereby enhancing law and order.

  • (a) Can deforestation be ethically justified in the pursuit of social welfare objectives like, housing for the homeless?
  • (b) What are the socio-economic, administrative and ethical challenges in balancing environmental conservation with human development?
  • (c) What substantial alternatives or policy interventions can be proposed to ensure that both environmental integrity and human dignity are protected?

20 marks250 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Case Studies: List stakeholders and issues, weigh two or three options, and recommend one with reasons.

For this question: Accept the goal, reject the means, and give alternatives that protect both housing and forest.

What the question asks

Case: A district plans to clear ecologically sensitive forest to build housing for the homeless; judge whether this can be ethically justified, identify the challenges in balancing conservation with development, and propose alternatives that protect both.

A strong opening

The administration's aim, shelter for the poor, is a constitutional and moral duty. The chosen means, clearing a biodiverse forest that supports climate, soil and tribal livelihoods, imposes heavy costs on others and on the future.

Points to cover

(a) Can deforestation be justified?

  • Utilitarian view: Housing benefits are real, but the forest's services (rainfall, soil, biodiversity, livelihoods) affect many more people over a longer time.
  • Rights view: The homeless have a right to shelter, but tribal and forest communities also have rights over the forest, including under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
  • Intergenerational justice: Old-growth forest cannot be replaced in a lifetime.
  • Conclusion: Clearing such a forest is not justified when alternative sites exist; the goal is right, the means are not.

(b) Challenges

  • Socio-economic: Scarcity of urban land, cost of alternatives, and livelihood loss for forest dwellers.
  • Administrative: Coordinating housing, forest and revenue departments; forest clearance rules; pressure to show quick results.
  • Ethical: Pitting one vulnerable group against another; using law-and-order and wildlife conflict as arguments for clearance.

(c) Alternatives and policy interventions

  • Use degraded, government or vacant urban land; vertical and affordable rental housing; in-situ slum upgrading.
  • Manage human-wildlife conflict through barriers and early warning, and anti-social activity through policing, not clearing.
  • Involve gram sabhas and forest communities; if any diversion is unavoidable, follow due process and ensure compensatory afforestation.
A balanced conclusion

Human dignity and environmental integrity are not opposites. A careful choice of land and design can house the poor without destroying the forest that sustains them and others.

Sources: Forest Rights Act (India) (Wikipedia)

GS IV Q9Ethics: Case Studies

Subash is Secretary, PWD in the State Government. He is a senior officer, known for his competence, integrity and dedication to work. He enjoys the trust and confidence of Minister Incharge of PWD and Programme Implementation. As a part of his job profile, he is responsible for policy formulation, execution of projects relating to infrastructure initiatives in the State. Besides, he oversees the technical and administrative aspects relating to planning, designing and construction etc. Subash's Minister is an important Minister in the state and significant growth in urban infrastructure development and road network has been registered during his tenure. He is very keen for launching of ambitious road construction project in the near future. Subash is in regular touch with the Minister and is working various modalities of road construction project. Regular meetings, interactions and presentations are made by him to the Minister before a formal public announcement of the project is made by the Minister. Subash's only son Vikas is in real estate business. His son from his own sources is aware that a mega road project is on the anvil and announcement in this regard is expected anytime. He is very keen to know from his father the exact location of the upcoming project. He knows that there would be quantum jump in the prices of land in the vicinity. Buying land at this stage at cheaper prices would pay him rich dividends. He is pleading with him (his father) day in and day out to share him location of the proposed project. He assured him that he would handle the matter discretely as it would not attract any adverse notice as he in the normal course, keeps on buying land as a part of his business. He feels pressurised because of constant pleadings by his son. Another significant aspect of the matter pertained to the extra/undue interest in the above project by the Minister PWD. His nephew was also having big infrastructure project company. In fact, the Minister has also introduced his nephew to him and indicated to him to take care of his nephew's business interest in the forthcoming project. The Minister encouraged him to act fast in the matter as early announcement and execution of mega road project would enhance his status in the party and public life. In the above backdrop, Subash is in a fix as to the future course of action.

  • (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case.
  • (b) Critically examine the options available to Subash in the above situation.
  • (c) Which of the above would be most appropriate and why?

20 marks250 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Discuss Cover the main aspects, with arguments on more than one side.
  • Critically examine Look at both sides with evidence, then give a reasoned judgement.

For Ethics: Case Studies: List stakeholders and issues, weigh two or three options, and recommend one with reasons.

For this question: Name the issues (conflict of interest, insider information, nepotism) before weighing options.

What the question asks

Case: A PWD Secretary is pressed by his son for inside information on a road project and by his Minister to favour the Minister's nephew; discuss the ethical issues, examine his options, and choose the most appropriate.

A strong opening

Subash holds confidential information about a mega road project. Both his son and his Minister want to use that information or his office for private gain.

Points to cover

(a) Ethical issues

  • Conflict of interest and misuse of confidential information (insider dealing in land).
  • Nepotism and favouritism in award of contracts.
  • Integrity and impartiality against loyalty to family and to a powerful Minister.
  • Public trust in fair procurement and land markets.

(b) Options

  • Share the location with his son: Personal gain, a breach of trust and possibly a criminal offence; unacceptable.
  • Help the Minister's nephew: Corrupt favouritism and a violation of procurement rules; unacceptable.
  • Refuse both quietly: Ethical, but may leave the Minister's pressure unchecked.
  • Refuse both, record the Minister's oral instruction, follow transparent competitive bidding, and if pressure continues, inform the Chief Secretary or seek a transfer: Ethical and protective, though it may cost him the Minister's goodwill.

(c) Most appropriate option

  • The last: Firmly decline his son and explain why; insist on a fair, transparent tender open to all; put instructions in writing and escalate if pressured. Integrity and neutrality are non-negotiable for a civil servant.
A balanced conclusion

Subash's competence is valuable only because of his integrity. Protecting confidential information and fair competition protects both the public interest and his own conscience.

GS IV Q10Ethics: Case Studies

Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set-back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer-related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter.

  • (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation?
  • (b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case?
  • (c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why?

20 marks250 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

For Ethics: Case Studies: List stakeholders and issues, weigh two or three options, and recommend one with reasons.

For this question: Cite Rule 157 of the GFR against splitting orders; it settles the legal side at once.

What the question asks

Case: An officer awaiting promotion is asked by his reporting officer to buy stationery from a favoured vendor, and staff suggest splitting a ₹35 lakh order to avoid higher sanction; list his options and the ethical issues, and recommend the right course.

A strong opening

The order exceeds the ₹30 lakh limit of Rajesh's delegated powers, so it needs the next higher authority's sanction. Splitting it would breach the General Financial Rules, which forbid dividing a demand into small purchases to avoid the sanction of higher authority.

Points to cover

(a) Options

  • Split the order to avoid seeking sanction and please the boss.
  • Place the full order at his level, ignoring the limit.
  • Refer the full proposal to the competent authority for sanction, with a note on the delegated limit and proper procurement procedure (competitive bids rather than a single named vendor).
  • Delay or avoid the decision.

(b) Ethical issues

  • Integrity and rule of law against career self-interest (ACR and promotion).
  • Possible favouritism to a vendor and loss to public money.
  • Courage to say no to a superior; the 'common practice' of splitting is no defence.

(c) Most appropriate option

  • Refer the full ₹35 lakh demand for sanction under the rules, recommend open competitive procurement, and politely explain to his boss that this protects both of them from audit objections. Short-term displeasure is better than a record of irregularity.
A balanced conclusion

A civil servant's long-term reputation rests on integrity, not on pleasing a superior. Following the rules here is also the safest path for Rajesh's career.

Sources: Department of Expenditure: General Financial Rules, 2017 (updated up to 31 January 2026), Rule 157

GS IV Q11Ethics: Case Studies

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Program, MGNREGA was earlier known as National Rural Employment Scheme, NREGA. It is an Indian Social Welfare Program that aimed at fulfilling the 'Right to Work' provisions made in the Constitution. MGNREGA was launched in 2006 under Rural Employment Sector by the Ministry of Rural Development. Main objective of the program is to give legal guarantee of wage employment to the adult members of rural households who are willing to do unskilled manual labour work subject to a maximum of 100 days per year for every household. Every rural household has the right to register under the scheme, job card is issued to the registered, Job Card holder can seek employment; State Government shall pay 25% of minimum wage for the first 30 days as compensatory daily unemployment allowance to the families and of wage for remaining period of the year. MGNREGA work was undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You have been appointed as an Administrator Incharge of the District. You have been given the responsibility of monitoring MGNREGA work undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You are also given the authority to give technical sanctions to all MGNREGA works. In one of the Panchayats in your jurisdiction, you notice that your predecessor has mismanaged the Program in terms of: (i) Money not disbursed to actual job-seekers. (ii) Muster Rolls of the Labourers not properly maintained. (iii) Mismatch between the work done and payments made. (iv) Payments made to fictitious persons. (v) Job Cards were given without looking into the need of person. (vi) Mismanagement of funds and to the extent of siphoning of funds. (vii) Approved works that never existed.

  • (a) What is your reaction to the above situation and how do you restore the proper functioning of MGNREGA Program in this regard?
  • (b) What actions would you initiate to solve the various issues listed above?
  • (c) How would you deal with the above situation?

20 marks250 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Your view Take a clear position in the first line, then support it.

For Ethics: Case Studies: List stakeholders and issues, weigh two or three options, and recommend one with reasons.

For this question: Note that VB-G RAM G replaced MGNREGA from 1 July 2026, then match each irregularity to a remedy.

What the question asks

Case: As district administrator you find serious mismanagement of the rural employment guarantee in a panchayat (fake beneficiaries, missing works, siphoned funds); state your response, the actions on each problem, and how you would handle the situation.

A strong opening

The case describes MGNREGA. Note that from 1 July 2026 the VB-G RAM G Act replaced it with a guarantee of 125 days of wage employment, but the problems and remedies described carry over to the new scheme.

Points to cover

(a) Reaction and restoring the programme

  • Treat it as a violation of workers' legal right to work and a misuse of public funds; act firmly but fairly.
  • Order an immediate verification of job cards, muster rolls and works, and suspend payments to doubtful entries.

(b) Actions on each problem

  • Payments not reaching workers and fictitious persons: Direct transfer to verified bank accounts linked to identity, and deletion of fake job cards.
  • Muster rolls and mismatch between work and payment: Digital muster rolls, measurement by technical staff and geo-tagged photographs of works.
  • Non-existent works and siphoning: Physical inspection, recovery of funds and criminal cases where warranted.
  • Job cards without need: Re-verification through gram sabhas.

(c) Handling the situation

  • Social audit through the gram sabha, a statutory feature of the scheme, to bring facts into the open.
  • Fix responsibility on officials and intermediaries, including the predecessor's team, through due process.
  • Strengthen grievance redress, publish work and payment details, and train panchayat staff.
A balanced conclusion

A rights-based programme fails when its records are false. Transparency, social audit and swift accountability can restore both the programme and the people's trust.

Study the topic: VB-G RAM G Scheme and Act, 2025: The 125-Day Guarantee That Replaced MGNREGA

Sources: PIB: VB-G RAM G Act to come into force from July 1, 2026; Social audit (Wikipedia)

GS IV Q12Ethics: Case Studies

Ashok is Divisional Commissioner of one of the border districts of the North East State. A few years back, Military has taken over the neighbouring country after overthrowing the elected civil government. Civil war situation is prevailing in the country especially in last two years. However, internal situation further deteriorated due to rebel groups taking over control of certain populated areas near own border. Due to intense fight between military and rebel groups, civilian casualties has increased manifold in recent past. In the meantime, in one night Ashok got information from the local police guarding the border check post that there are about 200-250 people mainly women and children trying to cross over to our side of the border. There are also about 10 soldiers with their weapons in military uniform part of this group who wants to cross over. Women and Children are also crying and begging for help. A few of them are injured and bleeding profusely need immediate medical care. Ashok tried to contact Home Secretary of the State but failed to do so due to poor connectivity mainly due to inclement weather.

  • (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope with the situation?
  • (b) What are the ethical and legal dilemmas being faced by Ashok?
  • (c) Which of the options, do you think would be more appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?
  • (d) In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the Border Guarding Police in dealing with soldiers in uniform?

20 marks250 words9 min 13 s

See the answer frameworkWhat to write, point by point

How to write this answer

  • Your view Take a clear position in the first line, then support it.

For Ethics: Case Studies: List stakeholders and issues, weigh two or three options, and recommend one with reasons.

For this question: Save lives first under security control; disarm and segregate the soldiers; report up the chain.

What the question asks

Case: Civilians, including injured women and children and about 10 armed soldiers, seek to cross into India from a neighbouring country in civil war; list Ashok's options, his ethical and legal dilemmas, the best course, and precautions for handling the soldiers.

A strong opening

Ashok faces a humanitarian emergency at night with no contact with the State capital. India is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, but the principle of non-refoulement, not returning people to danger, is widely seen as customary international law.

Points to cover

(a) Options

  • Refuse entry to everyone and secure the border.
  • Allow everyone in without checks.
  • Admit women, children and the injured for immediate medical care and shelter under supervision, while separating and disarming the soldiers, and report to the State and Union governments as soon as possible.

(b) Ethical and legal dilemmas

  • Compassion and the right to life against border security and national interest.
  • Acting without orders against the duty to act in an emergency.
  • India's lack of a refugee law and the end of the Free Movement Regime on the Myanmar border in 2024, against humanitarian obligations.
  • Treatment of armed foreign soldiers: Security risk and diplomatic implications.

(c) Most appropriate option

  • The third: Save lives first, as the Constitution's protection of life and dignity and humanitarian norms demand, under strict security control; document everyone, and seek orders from the government at the earliest. This balances humanity with security.

(d) Precautions with soldiers

  • Disarm them and keep weapons in safe custody; separate them from civilians; verify identity and record statements; inform the army, intelligence agencies and the Ministry of External Affairs; treat them humanely and avoid any public statement that could become a diplomatic issue.
A balanced conclusion

Ashok can uphold both humanity and security by acting quickly, carefully and on record. Saving the injured now and seeking policy direction next is the ethical course.

Sources: Refugees in India (Wikipedia); Non-refoulement (Wikipedia); PIB: MHA decides to scrap the Free Movement Regime between India and Myanmar

Questions students ask

UPSC Mains 2025 GS Paper 4: Common Questions

How many questions were asked in UPSC Mains 2025 GS Paper 4?

GS Paper 4 of UPSC Mains 2025, held on 24 August 2025, had 12 questions: 13 short parts and 6 case studies. The paper carried 250 marks and three hours.

Which topics did UPSC Mains 2025 GS Paper 4 cover?

By topic, the questions were: Ethics: Concepts and Thinkers (13), Ethics: Case Studies (6).

Does UPSC publish answers for Mains 2025 GS Paper 4?

No. UPSC publishes the question paper but not model answers. The answer frameworks on this page are written by Digitally Learn to show what each question asks and the points a good answer covers.

Questions are reproduced from the official question papers published by the Union Public Service Commission. UPSC does not publish model answers for the Main examination; the answer frameworks are written by Digitally Learn and are its copyright. upsc.gov.in