Which of the following statements is/are correct?
- 1. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.
- 2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
- a1 only
- b2 only
- cBoth 1 and 2
- dNeither 1 nor 2
See the answer and explanationWith how to crack it
Answer: (b) 2 only
Statement 1 is wrong. Article 107(3) of the Constitution says a Bill pending in Parliament shall not lapse by reason of the prorogation of the Houses. Prorogation only ends a session; the Bill stays where it was and is taken up in the next session.
Statement 2 is correct. Article 107(4) says a Bill pending in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) which has not been passed by the House of the People (Lok Sabha) shall not lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha is a permanent House, so a Bill that began there and never reached the Lok Sabha survives. Answer (b), 2 only.
Separate the two events. Prorogation ends a session, dissolution ends the House. Only dissolution can kill a Bill, and even then not one that began in the Rajya Sabha and never went to the Lok Sabha.
Under Article 107(5), dissolution makes a Bill lapse if it is pending in the Lok Sabha, or if it was passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha (subject to a joint sitting under Article 108). Prorogation never makes a Bill lapse.
Sources: Constitution of India, Article 107 (Legislative Department, 2024 edition)