Overview

The Tughlaq dynasty was the third dynasty to rule the Delhi Sultanate, from 1320 to 1414. It was founded by Ghazi Malik, who took the throne as Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq. Under his son Muhammad bin Tughlaq the Sultanate reached its widest extent, and his two boldest experiments, moving the capital to Daulatabad and issuing a token currency, both failed. Firuz Shah Tughlaq (also written Firoz Shah) built canals and towns. After 1388 the dynasty declined, and Timur sacked Delhi in 1398.

Tughlaq Dynasty: Founder, Rulers and Time Period (1320 to 1414)

Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: The Founder

The Khalji dynasty ended in confusion. After Alauddin Khalji died in 1316, palace murders followed, and in 1320 Khusro Khan killed Mubarak Khalji and took the throne. Ghazi Malik, the governor in the Punjab, marched on Delhi, killed Khusro Khan and became Sultan as Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq, starting the dynasty.

  • Frontier general: As governor of Multan and then Dipalpur under Alauddin Khalji, he guarded the north-west against the Mongols and led the vanguard against the invasion of 1306.
  • Tughlaqabad: In 1321 he built a fortified city east of Delhi, the third historic city of Delhi, as a stronghold against the Mongols.
  • Warangal: His son Jauna Khan, the future Muhammad bin Tughlaq, besieged the Kakatiya capital Warangal in 1323; the victory ended the Kakatiya dynasty.
  • Bengal: He campaigned in Bengal, at Lakhnauti, from 1324 to 1325.
  • Death: In 1325 a wooden pavilion built in his honour collapsed on him. Ibn Battuta claimed it was a conspiracy by his son; other chroniclers blamed lightning or running elephants.

The Tughlaq Rulers and Their Reigns

The Tughlaq dynasty ruled from 1320 to 1414, the third of the five dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate, after the early Turkish rulers and the Khaljis and before the Sayyids and the Lodis. Three strong reigns filled the first 68 years; weak successors and civil war filled the last 26.

Table 1. The Tughlaq rulers and their reigns
Ruler Reign Known for
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq 1320 to 1325 Founder; Tughlaqabad; Warangal taken
Muhammad bin Tughlaq 1325 to 1351 Widest empire; Daulatabad; token currency
Firuz Shah Tughlaq 1351 to 1388 Canals, towns, hereditary posts
Weak successors 1388 to 1414 Civil wars; Timur sacks Delhi, 1398
Time line from 1320 to 1414 in four bands: Ghiyasuddin, 1320 to 1325; Muhammad bin Tughlaq, 1325 to 1351; Firuz Shah Tughlaq, 1351 to 1388; weak heirs, 1388 to 1414. Marked events: The capital moved to Daulatabad in 1327; Vijayanagara founded in 1336; the Bahmani kingdom in 1347; Timur sacks Delhi in 1398. Note: Khizr Khan entered Delhi in 1414 and founded the Sayyid dynasty.

Dates differ slightly between books. Some give Ghiyasuddin's reign as 1320 to 1324 and Muhammad's from 1324, because Ghiyasuddin died early in 1325. The last Tughlaq Sultan was Nasiruddin Mahmud, who ruled from 1394 until his death in 1412 and in whose reign Timur invaded. The two years between his death and 6 June 1414, when Khizr Khan took Delhi and founded the Sayyid dynasty, are counted with the Tughlaq period, which is why the dynasty is dated to 1414.

Muhammad bin Tughlaq: The Sultan and His Experiments

Muhammad bin Tughlaq: Real Name, Learning and New Nobility

Muhammad bin Tughlaq ruled from 1325 to 1351. He was a learned ruler, skilled in Persian, Hindavi, Arabic, Sanskrit and Turkic, with an interest in medicine; his full name was Fakhruddin Muhammad Shah, and as a prince he was called Jauna Khan. Under him the Delhi Sultanate reached its widest extent, with campaigns between 1330 and 1335 that carried its armies across most of the subcontinent; Kampili in south Karnataka, the last Hindu principality in the south, had been annexed in 1328.

His mind was open as well as learned. He talked with Muslim mystics, Hindu yogis and Jain saints such as Jinaprabha Suri, and orthodox theologians accused him of being a rationalist, a man who would not accept religious ideas on faith alone. He was also hasty and impatient, which is why so many of his experiments failed.

He also changed who ruled for him. The Khaljis and Tughlaqs raised people of humble birth, often their clients, to high office, and Muhammad appointed a wine distiller, a barber, a cook and two gardeners to high administrative posts. The chronicler Ziauddin Barani saw this as a sign of the Sultan's loss of judgement, a view that tells us as much about the old nobility as about the Sultan.

Map of the Indian subcontinent with the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal and the Deccan, and fourteen numbered places. Capitals: Delhi and Tughlaqabad; Daulatabad, the capital from 1327; Kanauj, near the Swargadwari camp. Campaigns: Warangal, taken in 1323; Kampili, annexed in 1328; Lakhnauti in Bengal, 1324 to 1325; Kumaon, the Qarachil expedition of 1333; Thatta, where Muhammad bin Tughlaq died in 1351. Broke away: The Madurai Sultanate, 1334; Vijayanagara, 1336; the Bahmani kingdom at Gulbarga, 1347. Firuz's towns: Hisar and Jaunpur. Timur: Multan, 1398.

Governors ran territories called iqtas, and their holders, the muqtis, collected the revenue as salary and paid their soldiers from it. Under Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad Tughlaq these posts were not hereditary, holders were moved often, and accountants checked the revenue.

Daulatabad: The Move of the Capital in 1327

In 1327 Muhammad bin Tughlaq ordered the capital moved from Delhi to Devagiri, which he renamed Daulatabad, in present-day Maharashtra. He had campaigned in the south as a prince, and Daulatabad lay at a central place from which both the north and the south could be administered. The residents of the oldest of Delhi's four cities were sent to the new capital, and the soldiers of his large standing army were garrisoned in the emptied city.

  • The road: A broad road was built with shady trees on both sides and halting stations every two miles, with food and water, and a regular postal service linked Delhi and Daulatabad.
  • The cost: Many died on the road of hunger and exhaustion, and the move was resented.
  • The return: Revolts in the south and in Bengal, and fear for the northern frontier, led him to move the capital back to Delhi in 1335, costing more lives.
  • The result: The Muslim elite settled at Daulatabad stayed on and carried the Urdu language to the Deccan; one of them, Hasan Gangu, later founded the Bahmani kingdom.

Token Currency of Muhammad bin Tughlaq: Brass and Copper Coins

Muhammad bin Tughlaq needed large sums of cash to pay his soldiers, and the costly campaigns had emptied the treasury. Around 1330 he issued a token currency, coins of brass and copper that were to pass at the value of gold and silver, somewhat like present-day paper money.

The idea had precedents. Silver was short across the world in the fourteenth century, and Kublai Khan in China and the Mongol ruler of Iran, Ghazan Khan, had already tried a token currency.

The experiment failed for four connected reasons.

  • The coins carried inscriptions in Persian and Arabic rather than a royal seal, so people could not tell the official coin from a forgery.
  • People saved their gold and silver coins and paid all their taxes in the new token coins.
  • The cheap coins were easily counterfeited; Barani wrote that the houses of the Hindus became mints.
  • The value of the coins collapsed, and trade and commerce were disrupted.

The token currency had to be recalled. The Sultan bought back both the real and the counterfeit coins at great expense, until heaps of coins lay within the walls of Tughlaqabad; use of the token coins had stopped by 1333.

Khurasan Plan, Qarachil Expedition and the Famine in the Doab

Muhammad bin Tughlaq was the first Sultan of Delhi to plan a campaign to capture Mongol territory. Confident after defeating a Mongol attack early in his reign, he raised a large standing army for an attack on Transoxiana and Khurasan. The soldiers were paid a year in advance and then kept idle; the treasury could not keep paying them, and the army was disbanded.

In 1333 he sent the Qarachil expedition into the Kumaon hills. Later chroniclers say he meant to cross the Himalayas towards China; the army could not fight in the hills, and nearly all of it perished. He then gave up his plans to invade Transoxiana.

To feed and pay the army he levied additional taxes in the Ganga-Yamuna doab. The higher taxes came just as a famine began that lasted about six years; peasants fled their fields, and widespread rebellion followed. So many people died in Delhi that the air became pestilential, and the Sultan left the city to live for about two and a half years in a camp called Swargadwari, on the Ganga near Kanauj.

Back in Delhi, he tried to repair the damage through a separate department of agriculture, the Diwan-i-Amir-i-Kohi. The doab was divided into blocks, each under an official who gave loans to cultivators and urged them to grow better crops, wheat in place of barley and sugarcane in place of wheat. The scheme failed because the officials were inexperienced and dishonest, and Firuz Shah later wrote off the loans.

Why Muhammad bin Tughlaq Is Called the Wisest Fool

Muhammad bin Tughlaq is called the wisest fool, or the mad king, because a brilliant and learned ruler made plans that failed badly in practice and caused great suffering. The move to Daulatabad, the token currency and the Khurasan army are the three best known.

Time line of Muhammad bin Tughlaq's reign, 1325 to 1351, in two lanes. Experiments: The capital at Daulatabad, 1327 to 1335; the token currency, 1330 to 1333; the Qarachil expedition, 1333; famine in the doab from 1335. Revolts: The Madurai Sultanate, 1334; Vijayanagara, 1336; the Bahmani kingdom, 1347; the Sultan dies at Thatta, 1351. Note: The great schemes came in the first decade of the reign, and revolts filled the rest of it.
Table 2. Muhammad bin Tughlaq's schemes and why they failed
Scheme Reasoning Why it failed
Daulatabad A central second capital Forced move, heavy loss of life
Token currency Cash for a large army No control of minting; forgery
Khurasan army War against the Mongols Could not be paid; disbanded
Doab taxes Feed and pay the army Came with famine; revolt
Agriculture department Loans for better crops Officials dishonest; loans lost

A fair judgement weighs both sides. His measures were hasty and badly prepared, and he rarely took advice; Ibn Battuta criticised his excessive gifts and harsh punishments. Yet each plan had a reason, and unlike Alauddin's defensive measures, his were conceived as an offensive against the Mongols. Today a sudden, ill-considered order is still called a "Tughlaqi firman".

Revolts and the Breakup of the Tughlaq Empire (1327 to 1351)

Madurai, Vijayanagara and the Bahmani Kingdom Break Away

Revolts began in 1327 and grew after 1335, and the empire shrank from its edges. It was difficult to hold distant provinces like Bengal from Delhi, and soon after southern India was annexed, the whole region became independent. By the time Muhammad bin Tughlaq died, the Sultanate's control had shrunk to the north of the Narmada.

  • Madurai Sultanate, 1334: Jalaluddin Ahsan Khan rebelled in Mabar and founded an independent sultanate at Madurai; on his way to crush it, the Sultan fell ill in an outbreak of plague at Bidar.
  • Warangal, 1336: Kapaya Nayaka defeated the Tughlaq army and took Warangal back.
  • Vijayanagara, 1336: Harihara and Bukka founded the Vijayanagara kingdom, which later ended the Madurai Sultanate.
  • Bengal: The eastern provinces under their own governors broke away during his reign, and Bengal stayed outside the Sultanate even after Firuz Shah's campaign of 1359.
  • Bahmani kingdom, 1347: The amirs of the Deccan rebelled; Zafar Khan, also known as Hasan Gangu, founded the Bahmani kingdom, with its capital at Gulbarga.

Muhammad bin Tughlaq spent his last years chasing rebellions. He died in March 1351 at Thatta in Sindh, while campaigning against rebels there. The Deccan kingdoms that rose against him, Vijayanagara and the Bahmanis, went on to contest the south between them.

Firuz Shah Tughlaq (1351 to 1388): Administration, Canals and Towns

Firuz Shah Tughlaq's Administration and Religious Policy

Firuz Shah Tughlaq, a cousin of Muhammad bin Tughlaq and the son of Ghiyasuddin's brother Rajab, took the throne in Sindh in March 1351 and ruled for 37 years. He took to heart the mistakes of his cousin's rule and recognised the Deccan's independence.

  • Hereditary posts: A noble's son could succeed to his father's post and assignment, and an old soldier could send his son or even his slave in his place.
  • Milder rule: He raised the salaries of nobles, lowered the land taxes Muhammad had raised and, by his own account, ended punishments such as cutting off hands.
  • Welfare: Hospitals for free treatment of the poor, and a department, the Diwan-i-Khairat, that gave money for the marriage of daughters of poor families.
  • Religious policy: He followed the Sharia and the theologians closely, persecuted sects they considered heretical, and ended the old exemption of Brahmins from jizya.
  • Learning: He kept a large library, had Sanskrit works translated into Persian and Arabic, and opened madrasas.
  • Slaves: He set up a separate department of slaves and is said to have owned about 1,80,000; some were trained as artisans for the royal workshops, the karkhanas, and others formed a corps loyal to the Sultan alone.

His reign has been described as the greatest age of corruption in medieval India. His own memoir claims he banned the tortures used by earlier Sultans, yet his court historian, Afif, recorded harsh punishments, among them a Brahmin burnt alive for converting Muslim women.

Firuz Shah Tughlaq's Canals, Towns, Tomb and Public Works

Firuz Shah Tughlaq is best remembered as a builder. He dug five major canals for irrigation, among them the renovated Western Yamuna Canal, and brought more land under grain and fruit. The longest ran about 200 kilometres, from the Sutlej to Hansi. His irrigation canals joined the Yamuna to the Ghaggar and the Sutlej, and they remained in use into the nineteenth century.

  • Towns: Hisar, Fatehabad, Firozpur, Jaunpur and Firozabad, his new city of Delhi, founded in 1354.
  • Ashokan pillars: He brought two Ashokan pillars to Delhi, from Topra and Meerut, carefully wrapped and carried by cart trains; the Topra pillar was re-erected at Firozabad in 1356.
  • Repairs: When lightning struck the Qutb Minar in 1368, he replaced its top storey with the two floors that stand today.
  • Public works: He built sarais, gardens, bridges, mosques and madrasas, among them the madrasa at Hauz Khas (1352‑54), where his own tomb stands.

Tughlaq Dynasty Architecture, Sources and Decline

Tughlaq Dynasty Architecture: Tughlaqabad to Firozabad

Tughlaq buildings, a distinct phase of Indo-Islamic architecture, are known above all for the sloping, rubble-filled wall. At Tughlaqabad the city walls rise 10 to 15 metres, topped by battlements and strengthened by round bastions, and Ghiyasuddin's own tomb, a single-domed square of red sandstone, has the same sloping walls.

Table 3. The three Tughlaq cities of Delhi
City of Delhi Built by What survives
Tughlaqabad, the third city Ghiyasuddin, 1321 Walls, bastions, his tomb
Jahanpanah, the fourth city Muhammad bin Tughlaq, 1326‑27 Wall fragments, Begumpuri mosque
Firozabad, the fifth city Firuz Shah, 1354 Feroz Shah Kotla, Ashokan pillar

Jahanpanah, the Refuge of the World, joined the earlier cities of Qila Rai Pithora and Siri to guard against the Mongols; its main mosque was the Begumpuri mosque. Firozabad's citadel, Feroz Shah Kotla, still holds a Jami Masjid, a stepwell and the Topra pillar.

Persian Sources of the Tughlaq Age: Barani, Afif and Ibn Battuta

Much of what we know of the Tughlaqs comes from histories, tawarikh, written in Persian, the language of administration. Their authors were learned men, secretaries, administrators, poets and courtiers, who recounted events and advised rulers on just rule. Because they wrote for the court, they reflect the attitudes of the elite of their age.

  • Ziauddin Barani (1285 to 1357): His Tarikh-i-Firuz Shahi covers Ghiyasuddin to the first six years of Firuz Shah; his Fatawa-i-Jahandari sets out the ideals a Muslim ruler should follow.
  • Shams-i Siraj Afif: Firuz Shah's court historian.
  • Firuz Shah's memoir: The Sultan's own account of his reforms and his religious policy.
  • Amir Khusrau: His Tughluq Nama describes Ghiyasuddin's rise from humble beginnings.
  • Ibn Battuta: A Moroccan traveller who reached Sindh in 1333, served Muhammad bin Tughlaq as qazi of Delhi, and was sent as envoy to China in 1342; his Rihla, in Arabic, describes the court and the horse-post and foot-post.

These sources show the spirit of the age in two ways. They describe events, and they carry the values of the men who wrote them, the court elite: Barani's anger at low-born officials and his exaggeration of Delhi's emptying tell us how the old nobility saw the Sultan's changes, so the works are evidence to be weighed, not a neutral record.

Tughlaq Dynasty Last Ruler: Civil Wars, Timur and the Sayyids

After Firuz Shah died in 1388, no able ruler followed. A first civil war had broken out in 1384 among his heirs and nobles, and a second in 1394, when two rival Sultans held court a few kilometres apart in Delhi and Firozabad. Provinces stopped paying tax, and most of India became a patchwork of smaller kingdoms.

In 1398 the Turco-Mongol conqueror Timur invaded. He took Multan in October, defeated the Sultanate's armies and entered Delhi, and the city was plundered and its people massacred; Sultan Nasiruddin Mahmud fled. Before leaving, Timur is believed to have made Khizr Khan his viceroy; Khizr Khan entered Delhi on 6 June 1414 and founded the Sayyid dynasty.

Previous Year UPSC‑CSE Questions

Each Prelims question is explained option by option, and each Mains question comes with an answer outline.

  1. UPSC Prelims 2021Consider the following statements:
    1. It was during the reign of Iltutmish that Chengiz Khan reached the Indus in pursuit of the fugitive Khwarezm prince.
    2. It was during the reign of Muhammad bin Tughluq that Taimur occupied Multan and crossed the Indus.
    3. It was during the reign of Deva Raya II of Vijayanagara Empire that Vasco da Gama reached the coast of Kerala.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 1 and 2
    3. c 3 only
    4. d 2 and 3
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Date each event and check the reign it names.

    • Step 1: Statement 1 is correct. Chengiz Khan reached the Indus in 1221, in pursuit of the Khwarezm prince, during Iltutmish's reign.
    • Step 2: Statement 2 is wrong. Timur occupied Multan and sacked Delhi in 1398, under Nasiruddin Mahmud, not Muhammad bin Tughlaq, who died in 1351.
    • Step 3: Statement 3 is wrong. Vasco da Gama reached Kerala in 1498, long after Deva Raya II (1423 to 1446).

    Trap to watch: Timur came in 1398, almost fifty years after Muhammad bin Tughlaq died in 1351.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 only: Correct. Only the Chengiz Khan statement places the event in the right reign.
    • (b) 1 and 2: Wrong. Timur came in 1398, under the last Tughlaq, not Muhammad bin Tughlaq.
    • (c) 3 only: Wrong. Vasco da Gama arrived in 1498, after Deva Raya II's reign.
    • (d) 2 and 3: Wrong. Both statements put the event in the wrong reign.

    Answer: (a) 1 only. Only statement 1 is right, because Timur came in 1398, long after Muhammad bin Tughlaq, and Vasco da Gama in 1498, after Deva Raya II.

  2. UPSC Prelims 2004Who was the last ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate?
    1. a Firoj Shah Tughlaq
    2. b Ghiyas-ud‑din Tughlaq Shah II
    3. c Nasir-ud‑din Mahmud
    4. d Nasrat Shah
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Follow the succession after 1388 to its end.

    • Step 1: After Firuz Shah died in 1388 no able ruler followed. Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq Shah II ruled briefly, and by the 1390s Nasiruddin Mahmud at Delhi and Nusrat Shah at Firozabad both claimed the throne.
    • Step 2: Nasiruddin Mahmud fled before Timur in 1398 and outlived his rival, ruling until 1412, so he was the last Tughlaq; Khizr Khan took Delhi in 1414.

    Trap to watch: Firuz Shah was the last strong ruler, not the last ruler; the name students remember is not the end of the line.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Firoj Shah Tughlaq: Wrong. Firuz Shah died in 1388, and the dynasty went on for another quarter of a century.
    • (b) Ghiyas-ud‑din Tughlaq Shah II: Wrong. He was Firuz Shah's short-lived successor, not the last of the line.
    • (c) Nasir-ud‑din Mahmud: Correct. He was the last Tughlaq Sultan, in whose reign Timur invaded.
    • (d) Nasrat Shah: Wrong. He was a rival claimant at Firozabad in the 1390s, not the last ruler.

    Answer: (c) Nasir-ud‑din Mahmud. Nasir-ud‑din Mahmud ruled until 1412, after Timur's invasion, and no Tughlaq followed him.

  3. UPSC Prelims 2002Assertion and Reason:
    1. Assertion (A): Muhammad bin Tughlaq left Delhi, and, for two years lived in a camp called Swarga-dwari.
    2. Reason (R): At that time, Delhi was ravaged by a form of plague and many people died.
    1. a Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
    2. b Both A and R are individually true but R is not a correct explanation of A
    3. c A is true but R is false
    4. d A is false but R is true
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Assertion and Reason

    Approach: Test the assertion, then the reason.

    • Step 1: Muhammad bin Tughlaq did leave Delhi and live in a camp called Swargadwari, on the Ganga near Kanauj, for about two and a half years, so A is true.
    • Step 2: The reason turns on how the deaths at Delhi are described, and the two readings give two defensible answers.

    Trap to watch: Do not confuse Swargadwari with the move of the capital to Daulatabad in 1327; they are different departures from Delhi.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A: Correct. On the commonly given reading, the pestilential air of Delhi was a form of plague, so R is true and explains why he left.
    • (b) Both A and R are individually true but R is not a correct explanation of A: Wrong. The pestilence is the reason for the move.
    • (c) A is true but R is false: Correct on the famine account. The cause was a severe famine of about six years, so R, which names a form of plague, is not right as worded.
    • (d) A is false but R is true: Wrong. He did live at Swargadwari, so A is true.

    Answer: (a) Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A. It is the commonly given answer, and (c) is equally defensible because the deaths came from a famine, not a plague.

    Answer in doubt

    Equally defensible: (c).

    UPSC published no answer key for 2002. NCERT (Satish Chandra, Medieval India) gives a severe famine of about six years as the cause, with so many deaths at Delhi that the air became pestilential, after which the Sultan lived for two and a half years at Swargadwari near Kanauj. The commonly given answer (a) reads the pestilential air as plague; on the famine account the Reason is not right as worded, so (c) is equally defensible. We count both (a) and (c) as correct.

  4. UPSC Prelims 2002With reference to medieval Indian rulers, which one of the following statements is correct?
    1. a Alauddin Khalji first set up a separate Ariz's department
    2. b Balban introduced the branding system of horses of military
    3. c Muhammad bin Tughlaq was succeeded by his uncle to the Delhi throne
    4. d Firuz Tughlaq set up a separate department of slaves
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Match each measure to the Sultan who introduced it.

    • Step 1: Check each ruler's measure. Balban, not Alauddin, first set up a separate ariz's department; Alauddin, not Balban, introduced the branding of horses (dagh); Muhammad bin Tughlaq was succeeded by his cousin Firuz Shah.
    • Step 2: Firuz Shah did set up a separate department of slaves, so (d) is the only correct statement.

    Trap to watch: The measures are real but swapped between rulers; match each measure to its Sultan.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Alauddin Khalji first set up a separate Ariz's department: Wrong. Balban first set it up; Alauddin later paid close attention to it.
    • (b) Balban introduced the branding system of horses of military: Wrong. Alauddin Khalji introduced the branding (dagh) of horses.
    • (c) Muhammad bin Tughlaq was succeeded by his uncle to the Delhi throne: Wrong. He was succeeded by his cousin, Firuz Shah Tughlaq.
    • (d) Firuz Tughlaq set up a separate department of slaves: Correct. His slaves worked in the royal workshops and formed a corps loyal to him.

    Answer: (d) Firuz Tughlaq set up a separate department of slaves. Firuz Shah Tughlaq set up a separate department of slaves, and the other three statements swap measures between rulers.

  5. UPSC Prelims 2000Consider the following events:
    1. I. Reign of Krishna Deva Raya of Vijayanagara.
    2. II. Construction of Qutab Minar.
    3. III. Arrival of Portuguese in India.
    4. IV. Death of Firoz Tughlaq.

    Which one of the following is the correct chronological sequence of the above events?

    1. a II, IV, III, I
    2. b II, IV, I, III
    3. c IV, II, I, III
    4. d IV, II, III, I
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Chronological order

    Approach: Give each event its year, then put them in order.

    • Step 1: Date the events. The Qutb Minar was begun under Aibak around 1200; Firuz Tughlaq died in 1388; the Portuguese arrived in 1498; Krishnadevaraya reigned from 1509.
    • Step 2: The order is II, IV, III, I.

    Trap to watch: The Portuguese arrived (1498) before Krishnadevaraya's reign began (1509).

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) II, IV, III, I: Correct. Qutb Minar, Firuz's death (1388), the Portuguese (1498), Krishnadevaraya (from 1509).
    • (b) II, IV, I, III: Wrong. The Portuguese arrived in 1498, before Krishnadevaraya's reign began in 1509.
    • (c) IV, II, I, III: Wrong. The Qutb Minar came about two centuries before Firuz Tughlaq's death.
    • (d) IV, II, III, I: Wrong. It too puts Firuz Tughlaq's death before the Qutb Minar.

    Answer: (a) II, IV, III, I. The Qutb Minar (about 1200), Firuz Tughlaq's death (1388), the Portuguese (1498), Krishnadevaraya (from 1509).

  6. UPSC Prelims 1998The Sultan of Delhi who is reputed to have built the biggest network of canals in India was
    1. a Iltutmish
    2. b Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq
    3. c Feroz Shah Tughlaq
    4. d Sikandar Lodi
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Ask which Sultan is known for irrigation works.

    • Step 1: Firuz Shah Tughlaq dug five major canals, including the renovated Western Yamuna Canal, joining the Yamuna to the Ghaggar and the Sutlej; the longest ran about 200 kilometres to Hansi.
    • Step 2: Iltutmish, Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq and Sikandar Lodi are known for other work, and none of them for a canal network.

    Trap to watch: Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq shares the dynasty's name, so students pick (b); he built the fort city of Tughlaqabad, not canals.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Iltutmish: Wrong. He consolidated the early Sultanate and is not known for a canal network.
    • (b) Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: Wrong. He built the fort city of Tughlaqabad, not a canal network.
    • (c) Feroz Shah Tughlaq: Correct. Firuz Shah's five canals were the largest network of the Sultanate.
    • (d) Sikandar Lodi: Wrong. He ruled from 1489 to 1517, long after, and is not known for canals.

    Answer: (c) Feroz Shah Tughlaq. Firuz Shah Tughlaq (Feroz in the question) dug five major canals, the largest network of the Sultanate.

  7. UPSC Mains 2020 GS‑IPersian literary sources of medieval India reflect the spirit of the age. Comment.
    Answer outline

    The outline sets out what the question asks, the main arguments, relevant examples and the direction of the conclusion; it is not a full model answer.

    Directive verb: Comment

    Approach: Agree that the sources reflect their age, prove it with examples, then state their limits.

    Introduction: The tawarikh, histories in Persian written by courtiers and administrators, are the main written sources for the Sultanate.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Events: Reigns, campaigns and experiments such as Daulatabad and the token currency.
    • Values: Barani's scorn for low-born officials and his ideal ruler in the Fatawa-i-Jahandari.
    • Self-image: Firuz Shah's memoir and the court history of Afif.
    • Distortion: Exaggerations such as the emptying of Delhi, checked against inscriptions.
    • Limits: Court-centred, silent on peasants and women; balance with travellers like Ibn Battuta.

    Conclusion: The sources mirror the outlook of the ruling class, which makes them evidence of the age as much as records of it.

Sources

Editorial Disclaimer

This article draws on the NCERT history textbooks, Delhi, Haryana and Maharashtra tourism pages, Wikipedia and the UPSC question papers. Some dates differ by a year between sources.

See more of our UPSC articles in Google Search

Add to Preferred Sources

More on Delhi Sultanate

All articles on Delhi Sultanate