Overview

The Lodi dynasty (1451 to 1526) was the last dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate and the first ruled by Afghans. It followed the Sayyid dynasty (1414 to 1451), which rose after Timur sacked Delhi in 1398 and the Sultanate broke into regional kingdoms. Bahlul Lodi founded the Lodi line, Sikandar Lodi founded Agra and strengthened the state, and Ibrahim Lodi lost his throne and his life to Babur at the First Battle of Panipat in 1526, which ended the Sultanate and opened the Mughal age.

Timur's Invasion and the Break-up of the Delhi Sultanate

Timur's Invasion of Delhi (1398) and the Rise of Regional Kingdoms

Timur, who had united Iran and Central Asia, sacked Delhi on 17 December 1398, after defeating Sultan Nasir-ud‑Din Mahmud Shah Tughlaq. The Sultan fled to Gujarat and then to Malwa. Timur carried away vast treasure and many skilled artisans, and annexed parts of the Punjab, which his successors held for generations.

The attack, coming on top of the Sultanate's growing weakness, emboldened provincial governors and autonomous chiefs to declare their independence. Bengal in the east and Sindh and Multan in the west broke away first; soon the governors of Gujarat, Malwa and Jaunpur did the same, and the Rajput states of Rajputana asserted their independence.

A balance of power grew up between these states. Gujarat, Malwa and Mewar checked one another in the west, and Bengal was held back by the rulers of Orissa and by Jaunpur. Malwa, weakened by quarrels within, became the main battleground in the struggle for mastery over north India.

Sharqi Sultanate of Jaunpur: The Shiraz of the East

The Sharqi Sultanate of Jaunpur was the first state to break away in the Ganga valley. Its founder, Malik Sarwar, a noble of Firuz Tughlaq's time, had been wazir and was then sent to the eastern provinces with the title Malik-us-Sharq, Lord of the East. His successors were called the Sharqis after this title, and they made Jaunpur, in eastern Uttar Pradesh, their capital.

  • Extent: At its height the kingdom ran from Aligarh to Darbhanga in north Bihar, and from Nepal to Bundelkhand.
  • Architecture: The Sharqis built palaces, mosques and tombs in a style of their own, with lofty gates and huge arches.
  • Learning: Poets, scholars and saints gathered at Jaunpur, which came to be called the Shiraz of the East; Malik Muhammad Jaisi, author of the Padmavat, lived there.

The Sharqis kept order over a large area after Delhi collapsed and kept Bengal out of eastern Uttar Pradesh, but their attempts to take Delhi failed. Once the Lodis were established, the Sharqis were pushed onto the defensive, and in 1484 Bahlul Lodi occupied Jaunpur and annexed their kingdom. The last Sharqi Sultan died in exile at Chunar.

Sayyid Dynasty: Rulers and Decline (1414 to 1451)

Sayyid Dynasty Founder Khizr Khan and the Sayyid Rulers

The Sayyid dynasty was the fourth dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, with four rulers in 37 years. Its founder, Khizr Khan, had been governor of Multan under Firuz Tughlaq. After the sack of Delhi, Timur made him his deputy at Multan, in charge of Lahore, Dipalpur, Multan and upper Sindh, and on 28 May 1414 he captured Delhi.

Khizr Khan never took the title of Sultan. He ruled as Rayat-i-Ala, a vassal of Timur and then of Timur's son Shah Rukh, whose name was read in the khutba. The name Sayyid came from the family's claim to descend from the Prophet Muhammad, a claim modern historians doubt.

Table 1. The Sayyid rulers of Delhi
Ruler Reign What happened
Khizr Khan 1414 to 1421 Took Delhi; ruled as a Timurid vassal
Mubarak Shah 1421 to 1434 Dropped the Timurid allegiance; called himself Shah
Muhammad Shah 1434 to 1445 Rebellions; Multan broke away under the Langahs
Alam Shah 1445 to 1451 Retired to Badaun and gave up Delhi to Bahlul Lodi

Decline of the Sayyids and the Rise of Bahlul Lodi

Mubarak Shah, Khizr Khan's son, ended the fiction of Timurid overlordship, struck coins as Muizz-ud‑Din Mubarak Shah and beat back Hoshang Shah of Malwa. His nephew Muhammad Shah faced rebellion and conspiracy, and the last Sayyid, Alam Shah, proved ineffective and left affairs to his minister, Hamid Khan.

Afghan chiefs meanwhile grew strong in the Punjab. The most important was Bahlul Lodi, who held the iqta of Sirhind, checked the warlike Khokhars and came to dominate the whole Punjab. Called in to help the ruler of Delhi against an attack from Malwa, he stayed, and his men took control of the city.

Bahlul crowned himself in 1451, and the Sayyid dynasty ended. Alam Shah lived on at Badaun until his death in 1478. The tomb of Muhammad Shah, built in 1444, still stands in the Lodi Gardens of Delhi.

Lodi Dynasty: Bahlul, Sikandar and Ibrahim Lodi (1451 to 1526)

Lodi Dynasty Founder Bahlul Lodi: The First Afghan Sultan

The Lodis were Afghans, unlike the Turks who had ruled Delhi before them. Afghans had formed a large part of the Sultanate's army, but few Afghan nobles had held high office. Their rise showed in Malwa too, where an Afghan dynasty ruled, and in the Bahmani kingdom, where they held important posts.

Bahlul Lodi spent most of his reign fighting the Sharqis of Jaunpur. Finding himself weak, he invited the Afghans of Roh to India; the Afghan historian Abbas Sarwani says they came like locusts. The flood of Afghans helped him defeat the Sharqis and made the Afghans a large and important part of Muslim society in north and south India.

The Afghan chiefs had a sturdy sense of tribal independence and saw the Sultan as no more than the first among equals. At his death in 1489 Bahlul divided the kingdom among his sons and relations. His son Sikandar undid the division after a hard struggle, but the Afghan idea that a kingdom should be shared among a ruler's sons persisted.

Table 2. The Lodi Sultans of Delhi
Ruler Reign Known for
Bahlul Lodi 1451 to 1489 Founder; annexed Jaunpur in 1484
Sikandar Lodi 1489 to 1517 Strong administration; founded Agra
Ibrahim Lodi 1517 to 1526 Quarrels with nobles; killed at Panipat

Sikandar Lodi: Administration, Agra and the Gaz-i-Sikandari

Sikandar Lodi (1489 to 1517) was the most important Lodi Sultan. He tried to subdue the Afghan chiefs and raise the Sultan above them. He made the nobles stand in his presence, made them ride out of town to receive his orders, and required all jagir-holders to submit regular accounts, with heavy punishment for embezzlement.

  • Law and order: Justice was stressed and the highways were made safe from robbers.
  • Prices and trade: Essential goods were cheap, and he abolished the octroi duty on grain.
  • Measures: He fixed a new yard, the gaz-i-Sikandari, which lasted into Mughal times.
  • Revenue records: The rent rolls of his time became the basis of Sher Shah's later rent rolls.
  • Agra: After careful survey he chose the site of Agra in 1506, to command eastern Rajasthan and the route to Malwa and Gujarat; it grew into the second capital of the Lodis.
Three columns, left to right. Bahlul Lodi, 1451 to 1489: The Sultan was seen as first among equals; he invited the Afghans of Roh; at his death in 1489 the kingdom was divided among his sons. Sikandar Lodi, 1489 to 1517: He undid the division, made the nobles stand in his presence, audited the jagir accounts, chose the site of Agra in 1506 and fixed the gaz-i-Sikandari. Ibrahim Lodi, 1517 to 1526: He aimed at a large centralised empire, killed nobles he distrusted, Afghan nobles rebelled, and Babur was invited in. The more the Sultan centralised, the more the Afghan chiefs resisted. In the end Daulat Khan, Ibrahim's own governor of the Punjab, invited Babur.

Sikandar was orthodox in religion. He reimposed the jizya on Hindus, executed a brahmana who held Hindu and Muslim scriptures equally true, and destroyed temples such as the one at Nagarkot. He was also a generous patron: Sanskrit works were translated into Persian, and many Hindus learnt Persian and entered the administration.

Ibrahim Lodi: Afghan Revolts, Rana Sanga and Daulat Khan

Ibrahim Lodi, Sikandar's eldest son, came to the throne in 1517. His efforts to build a large centralised empire alarmed both the Afghan chiefs and the Rajputs. His brother Jalal Khan, given Jaunpur, rebelled and was hunted down and executed, and Ibrahim arrested and killed nobles he distrusted.

Rana Sanga of Mewar, who had extended his power into eastern Malwa, inflicted a sharp defeat on Ibrahim at Khatoli when he invaded Mewar. In the east, Afghan nobles such as Bahar Khan Lohani declared independence.

In the Punjab, Daulat Khan Lodi, the governor, was almost an independent ruler. He sent an embassy led by his son, Dilawar Khan, to invite Babur to India and displace Ibrahim, whom he called a tyrant without support among his nobles. Ibrahim's uncle, Alam Khan, a pretender to the throne, also sought Babur's help, and a messenger from Rana Sanga probably came with a similar invitation.

Sayyid and Lodi Monuments: Lodi Gardens and Ibrahim Lodi Tomb

Little architecture survives from the Sayyid and Lodi periods, which makes the Lodi Gardens in Delhi important. The park holds the tomb of Muhammad Shah, the tomb of Sikandar Lodi, the Shisha Gumbad and the Bara Gumbad, and is protected by the Archaeological Survey of India.

  • Muhammad Shah's tomb, 1444: The earliest tomb in the garden is octagonal and ringed by chhatris with lotus finials, and it brings features of Hindu architecture into an Indo-Islamic building.
  • Bara Gumbad, 1494: A great domed gateway with a three-domed mosque, built under Sikandar Lodi.
  • Shisha Gumbad: Named for its glazed tiles, it holds graves that cannot be identified for certain; they belong either to an unknown family of Sikandar Lodi's court or to Bahlul Lodi.
  • Sikandar Lodi's tomb: Enclosed by battlements, and apparently copied from Muhammad Shah's tomb.

Ibrahim Lodi's tomb is not in the Lodi Gardens, as is often thought. It stands at Panipat, near the tehsil office and the dargah of the Sufi saint Bu Ali Shah Qalandar, a simple rectangular structure on a high platform reached by steps. The British moved it in 1866 when building the Grand Trunk Road and added an inscription on his death in battle.

Fall of the Delhi Sultanate: Babur and the First Battle of Panipat

Why Babur Invaded India: Kabul, the Punjab and the Invitations

Babur, a descendant of Timur, became ruler of Farghana in Central Asia in 1494 at the age of twelve. Driven out by the Uzbeks, he took Kabul in 1504, and from then on, he wrote, he never ceased to think of the conquest of Hindustan.

  • Wealth: Like earlier invaders, he was drawn by India's riches.
  • A claim: Timur had annexed parts of the Punjab, and Babur felt they were rightly his.
  • Poverty of Kabul: Kabul's income could not support his army and nobles.
  • Safety: India was a refuge and a base against the Uzbeks.
  • Invitations: Daulat Khan and Alam Khan invited him, and Rana Sanga probably did too.

Babur first took the powerful fort of Bhira on his campaign of 1518‑19, but did not keep it. On his next campaign, in 1520‑21, he crossed the Indus once more and easily captured Bhira and Sialkot, the twin gateways to Hindustan, and Lahore. In 1525 Daulat Khan changed sides and marched on Lahore, but his army melted away at Babur's approach, and within three weeks of crossing the Indus Babur was master of the Punjab.

Map of north India. Lodi kingdom: Delhi, the capital; Agra, its site chosen in 1506; Sirhind, Bahlul's iqta; Jaunpur, the Sharqi capital annexed in 1484. Rival states: Ahmedabad in Gujarat, Mandu in Malwa, Chittor in Rana Sanga's Mewar, Pandua in Bengal, and Multan, which broke away. Babur's road, dashed, from Bhira, his first gain, through Sialkot, Lahore and Sirhind to Panipat, 20 April 1526; Khanwa, 1527.

First Battle of Panipat (1526): How Babur Defeated Ibrahim Lodi

Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi at the First Battle of Panipat on 20 April 1526. Ibrahim came with a force put at 1,00,000 men and 1,000 elephants, though his fighting men were far fewer, since Indian armies carried large numbers of servants. Babur had crossed the Indus with 12,000 men, swelled by Indian nobles who joined him.

  • Defences: One wing rested on the town of Panipat and the other on a ditch filled with branches.
  • Carts and guns: Carts lashed together formed a wall in front, with breastworks for the gunners, a device Babur called Ottoman (Rumi).
  • Gunners: Two Ottoman master-gunners, Ustad Ali and Mustafa, served Babur; gunpowder became common in north India from his time.
  • The flanks: As Ibrahim's men attacked, the two outer wings of Babur's army wheeled round and struck from the side and rear, while the guns fired from the front.

Ibrahim's army fought bravely for two or three hours. Ibrahim died fighting with 5,000 to 6,000 men around him, and more than 15,000 of his soldiers were killed. The battle ended the Lodi rule that Bahlul had founded.

Battle plan seen from above, with Babur's army at the top and Ibrahim Lodi's army below. Babur's centre, 12,000 men and allies, stands between his two wings, with the town of Panipat on one flank and a ditch filled with branches on the other. In front of the centre, facing the enemy, carts lashed together with guns between them form a wall. Ibrahim Lodi's army, put at 1,00,000 men and 1,000 elephants, attacks the cart wall, while Babur's wings wheel round and hit it from the side and rear. On 20 April 1526 Ibrahim died fighting, and more than 15,000 of his men were killed.

End of the Lodi Dynasty and the Significance of Panipat

Panipat is counted among the decisive battles of Indian history. It broke the back of Lodi power, gave Babur Delhi and Agra, and the treasure Ibrahim had stored at Agra freed him from money troubles. The rich lands east as far as Jaunpur also lay open to him.

It did not settle everything. Babur still had to fight Rana Sanga at Khanwa in 1527 and the eastern Afghans, and Afghans such as Mahmud Lodi, Ibrahim's younger brother, joined Sanga in the hope of regaining Delhi. Seen this way, Panipat's real importance was that it opened a new phase in the struggle for north India, which the Afghans renewed under Sher Shah.

Previous Year UPSC‑CSE Questions

Each question is explained option by option.

  1. UPSC Prelims 2021Consider the following statements:
    1. It was during the reign of Iltutmish that Chengiz Khan reached the Indus in pursuit of the fugitive Khwarezm prince.
    2. It was during the reign of Muhammad bin Tughluq that Taimur occupied Multan and crossed the Indus.
    3. It was during the reign of Deva Raya II of Vijayanagara Empire that Vasco da Gama reached the coast of Kerala.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. a 1 only
    2. b 1 and 2
    3. c 3 only
    4. d 2 and 3
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Date each event and check which ruler was on the throne at the time.

    • Step 1: Statement 1 is correct. Chengiz Khan reached the Indus in 1221, in Iltutmish's reign, chasing the Khwarezm prince.
    • Step 2: Statement 2 is wrong. Timur came in 1398, under Nasir-ud‑Din Mahmud Shah Tughlaq; Muhammad bin Tughlaq had died in 1351.
    • Step 3: Statement 3 is wrong. Vasco da Gama reached Kerala in 1498, long after Deva Raya II.

    Trap to watch: Students who link Timur with Muhammad bin Tughlaq pick (b), but Timur came almost fifty years after his death.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 only: Correct. Only the Chengiz Khan statement is right.
    • (b) 1 and 2: Wrong. Timur came under Nasir-ud‑Din Mahmud, not Muhammad bin Tughlaq.
    • (c) 3 only: Wrong. Vasco da Gama arrived in 1498, after Deva Raya II's reign.
    • (d) 2 and 3: Wrong. Both statements are false.

    Answer: (a) 1 only. Chengiz Khan reached the Indus under Iltutmish, while Timur came long after Muhammad bin Tughlaq and Vasco da Gama long after Deva Raya II.

  2. UPSC Prelims 2013Consider the following Bhakti Saints :
    1. Dadu Dayal
    2. Guru Nanak
    3. Tyagaraja

    Who among the above was/were preaching when the Lodi dynasty fell and Babur took over?

    1. a 1 and 3
    2. b 2 only
    3. c 2 and 3
    4. d 1 and 2
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Multiple statements

    Approach: Compare each saint's lifetime with 1526, the year the Lodis fell.

    • Step 1: The Lodis fell in 1526.
    • Step 2: Guru Nanak lived from 1469 to 1539, so he was preaching then.
    • Step 3: Dadu Dayal was born in 1544 and Tyagaraja in 1767, both after 1526.

    Trap to watch: Students who know Dadu Dayal as a north Indian saint of the same tradition pick (d), but he was born in 1544, after the Lodis fell.

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) 1 and 3: Wrong. Neither Dadu Dayal nor Tyagaraja was alive in 1526.
    • (b) 2 only: Correct. Guru Nanak (1469 to 1539) was preaching when Babur took over.
    • (c) 2 and 3: Wrong. Tyagaraja was born in 1767.
    • (d) 1 and 2: Wrong. Dadu Dayal was born in 1544.

    Answer: (b) 2 only. Of the three, only Guru Nanak, who lived from 1469 to 1539, was alive in 1526.

  3. UPSC Prelims 2006Which one of the following is the correct chronological order of the Afghan rulers to the throne of Delhi?
    1. a Sikandar Shah-Ibrahim Lodi-Bahlol Khan Lodi
    2. b Sikandar Shah-Bahlol Khan Lodi-Ibrahim Lodi
    3. c Bahlol Khan Lodi-Sikandar Shah-Ibrahim Lodi
    4. d Bahlol Khan Lodi-Ibrahim Lodi-Sikandar Shah
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Chronological order

    Approach: Place each ruler by the year he came to the throne.

    • Step 1: Bahlul Lodi (Bahlol in the question) founded the dynasty in 1451.
    • Step 2: His son Sikandar, who took the title Sikandar Shah, ruled from 1489.
    • Step 3: Ibrahim, Sikandar's son, ruled from 1517 until Panipat.

    Trap to watch: Students who do not know that Sikandar Shah is Sikandar Lodi's royal title may take him for a separate, earlier ruler and pick (a) or (b).

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) Sikandar Shah-Ibrahim Lodi-Bahlol Khan Lodi: Wrong. Bahlul, the founder, came first.
    • (b) Sikandar Shah-Bahlol Khan Lodi-Ibrahim Lodi: Wrong. Bahlul was Sikandar's father and ruled before him.
    • (c) Bahlol Khan Lodi-Sikandar Shah-Ibrahim Lodi: Correct. Father, son and grandson in order.
    • (d) Bahlol Khan Lodi-Ibrahim Lodi-Sikandar Shah: Wrong. Ibrahim was the last Lodi Sultan.

    Answer: (c) Bahlol Khan Lodi-Sikandar Shah-Ibrahim Lodi. Bahlul founded the dynasty in 1451, his son Sikandar Shah followed in 1489, and Ibrahim in 1517.

  4. UPSC Prelims 2003Alam Khan, one of those who invited Babar to invade India was
    1. a An uncle of Ibrahim Lodi and a pretender to the throne of Delhi
    2. b A cousin of Ibrahim Lodi who was ill-treated and expelled from the country
    3. c The father of Dilawar Khan to whom cruel treatment was meted out by Ibrahim Lodi
    4. d A high official in Punjab province who was very much discontented with Ibrahim Lodi's treatment to his tribe
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: Single correct answer

    Approach: Tell Alam Khan apart from Daulat Khan, the governor of the Punjab, and his son Dilawar Khan.

    • Step 1: Alam Khan was Ibrahim Lodi's uncle, and after Panipat Babur took the throne himself instead of placing Alam Khan on it.
    • Step 2: The other options describe Daulat Khan, the governor of the Punjab, whose son Dilawar Khan led his embassy, or a cousin who does not fit.

    Trap to watch: Students who confuse Alam Khan with Daulat Khan, the discontented governor of the Punjab, pick (d).

    Why each option is right or wrong:

    • (a) An uncle of Ibrahim Lodi and a pretender to the throne of Delhi: Correct. He sought Babur's help to win the throne.
    • (b) A cousin of Ibrahim Lodi who was ill-treated and expelled from the country: Wrong. Alam Khan was Ibrahim's uncle.
    • (c) The father of Dilawar Khan to whom cruel treatment was meted out by Ibrahim Lodi: Wrong. Dilawar Khan was the son of Daulat Khan Lodi.
    • (d) A high official in Punjab province who was very much discontented with Ibrahim Lodi's treatment to his tribe: Wrong. That describes Daulat Khan, the governor.

    Answer: (a) An uncle of Ibrahim Lodi and a pretender to the throne of Delhi. Alam Khan was Ibrahim Lodi's uncle and sought Babur's help to win the throne.

Sources

Editorial Disclaimer

This article draws on the NCERT history textbooks and the other sources listed. Some dates of this period differ by a year or more between sources; NCERT's are used.

See more of our UPSC articles in Google Search

Add to Preferred Sources

More on Delhi Sultanate

All articles on Delhi Sultanate