Overview

Previous Year UPSC-CSE Questions By the end you will be able to draft model answers for the following UPSC questions. Each question carries a collapsible framework showing how to approach it in the exam.

  1. UPSC Prelims 2025Who among the following led a successful military campaign against the kingdom of Srivijaya, the powerful maritime State, which ruled the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Java and the neighbouring islands?
    1. a Amoghavarsha (Rashtrakuta)
    2. b Prataparudra (Kakatiya)
    3. c Rajendra I (Chola)
    4. d Vishnuvardhana (Hoysala)
    How to approach this Prelims question

    Question type: single-correct

    Approach: Recall which dynasty and ruler mounted a naval expedition against Srivijaya in Southeast Asia.

    Trap to watch: The Rashtrakuta, Kakatiya and Hoysala rulers were powerful but did not lead the Srivijaya campaign; the answer is the Chola king.

    Key facts to recall:

    • Rajendra Chola I extended Chola naval power across the Bay of Bengal.
    • He led a campaign against the Srivijaya empire of Southeast Asia.
    • His seal authenticates the Anaimangalam copper plates.

    Answer signal: The Srivijaya campaign was led by Rajendra I (Chola). Correct answer: Rajendra I (Chola).

  2. UPSC Mains 2022 GS-IDiscuss the main contributions of Gupta period and Chola period to Indian heritage and culture.
    How to structure the answer in the exam

    Directive verb: Discuss · Approach: Set out Gupta and then Chola contributions across art, administration and culture, in balance.

    Introduction: Open with the Gupta and Chola periods as two high points of Indian heritage, separated by centuries yet both foundational.

    Body (sub-themes to develop):

    • Gupta: classical art, literature, science and the golden-age temple form.
    • Chola architecture: the great temples, such as the Brihadeeswara temple at Thanjavur.
    • Chola bronzes: the Nataraja and the lost-wax sculpture tradition.
    • Chola administration: local self-government and land-grant records like the copper plates.
    • Maritime and cultural reach: Chola naval power and links across the Bay of Bengal.

    Conclusion: Conclude that the Gupta and Chola periods together shaped India's artistic, administrative and cultural heritage.

The Chola copper plates returned in 2026, known as the Anaimangalam plates or the Larger Leiden Plates, are an 11th-century set of copper-plate charters of the Chola dynasty. The Netherlands handed them to India during Prime Minister Modi's visit in May 2026, ending a long campaign to recover them from the University of Leiden. The set of twenty-one plates, in Sanskrit and Tamil and bound by a bronze ring bearing the seal of Rajendra Chola I, records a royal land grant, and stands among the most valuable records of Chola administration.

Why the Chola plates' return is in focus

An 11th-century charter comes home

During Prime Minister Modi's visit to the Netherlands in May 2026, the Dutch side returned a set of 11th-century Chola copper plates to India. The handover ended a long effort to bring the charter home.

Copper-plate charters were the official deeds of medieval Indian kingdoms. Engraved on copper and strung on a sealed ring, they recorded royal grants of land and revenue with legal force.

These plates, the Anaimangalam plates or Larger Leiden Plates, had been held at the University of Leiden. Their return was confirmed in the India-Netherlands Joint Statement issued during the visit.

The headline facts about the plates are:

  • Origin: an 11th-century charter of the Chola dynasty of southern India.
  • Form: twenty-one copper plates bound by a bronze ring bearing the seal of Rajendra Chola I.
  • Language: inscribed in both Sanskrit and Tamil.
  • Content: a royal grant of Anaimangalam village to a Buddhist monastery at Nagapattinam.

Why the return matters

A record of Chola statecraft restored

The plates are not just an artefact; they are a primary source. They document how the Cholas administered land, revenue and religion, so their return restores a key record for historians.

The charter also reflects the Chola state's reach. Its grant to a Buddhist monastery linked to maritime Southeast Asia shows the dynasty's pluralism and its wide commercial and cultural connections.

The return matters symbolically as well. Recovering a treasured charter affirms India's claim over its cultural heritage and strengthens the case for repatriating other antiquities held abroad.

The charter at a glanceA bound set of inscribed copper plates21copper plates in all5 in Sanskrit, 16 in Tamilbound on a single ringThe royal sealA bronze ring carriesthe seal of RajendraChola I, authenticatingthe grant.The Sanskrit portion gives the Chola genealogy; the Tamil portion records the grant.A legal deed engraved to last for centuries.Figure 1. Twenty-one plates, two languages, one royal seal.Epigraphic record; Archaeological Survey of India.Digitally LearnCopyright (c) 2026. All Rights Reserved.

What the charter signifies

Administration, pluralism and maritime reach

Three threads carry the weight: the detail of Chola administration, the religious pluralism it reveals, and the maritime links it records.

First, administration. The Tamil portion records the grant of revenues from Anaimangalam village, showing how the Cholas assigned land, assessed taxes and endowed institutions with precision.

Second, pluralism. A Hindu Chola king endowed a Buddhist monastery, the Chudamani Vihara at Nagapattinam, evidence of a tolerant and cosmopolitan court.

Third, maritime reach. The monastery was tied to Southeast Asian patrons, reflecting the Chola dynasty's trade and diplomatic links across the Bay of Bengal.

What the charter grantedA royal endowment recorded in copperThe Chola kingGrant issued underRajaraja Chola I,formalised by Rajendra IThe endowmentRevenues ofAnaimangalam villageThe beneficiaryChudamani Vihara,a Buddhist monasteryat NagapattinamA Hindu king’s endowment to a Buddhist monastery linked to Southeast Asia.Figure 2. From the Chola king to a Buddhist monastery at Nagapattinam.Epigraphic record; Archaeological Survey of India.Digitally LearnCopyright (c) 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Distinguishing features of the charter

The plates at a glance

The table sets out the key facts of the Anaimangalam plates, so their form and content are visible at a glance.

Feature Detail
Also known as Anaimangalam plates / Larger Leiden Plates
Period 11th century, Chola dynasty
Number of plates Twenty-one, bound by a bronze ring
Languages Sanskrit and Tamil
Royal seal Rajendra Chola I

Three features that define the plates

Three elements set this charter apart as a historical source:

  1. (i) Bilingual record. A Sanskrit section traces the Chola genealogy, while a Tamil section sets out the administrative detail of the grant.
  2. (ii) Authenticated by seal. The bronze ring carries the royal seal of Rajendra Chola I, giving the deed legal authority.
  3. (iii) Cross-cultural grant. A Hindu monarch endowed a Buddhist monastery tied to Southeast Asian patrons, a rare window into Chola pluralism.
From the Chola court to the Netherlands and backThe journey of the charter across the centuries11th c.Charter issuedby the CholasColonial eraTaken to theUniversity of Leiden2023Claim advanced viaUNESCO mechanisms2026Returnedto IndiaA long campaign, backed by UNESCO, culminated in the 2026 handover.Figure 3. Issued, removed, claimed, and returned.Ministry of External Affairs; UNESCO.Digitally LearnCopyright (c) 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Observable outcomes

Three trackable outcomes

The return translates into three visible developments for heritage and scholarship.

  1. (a) Conservation and display. The plates can be conserved in India and made accessible to scholars and the public.
  2. (b) Fresh research. Direct study of the original charter aids work on Chola administration, epigraphy and Tamil history.
  3. (c) Momentum for repatriation. A high-profile return strengthens India’s pursuit of other antiquities held in foreign collections.

Repatriation is a long process. Each case turns on provenance, the holding institution's cooperation and the legal mechanisms invoked, so outcomes vary widely.

Antiquities repatriation and cultural diplomacy

UNESCO, provenance and India's heritage drive

The return fits India's wider antiquities-repatriation drive, under which a growing number of idols, sculptures and artefacts have been brought back from collections abroad.

It connects to international heritage law, especially the UNESCO framework on the illicit transfer of cultural property and the body that promotes the return of objects to their countries of origin.

The episode also illustrates cultural diplomacy. Returning a cherished artefact builds goodwill between states and ties heritage to the broader bilateral relationship.

Three reasons repatriation mattersWhy India pursues the return of its antiquitiesHeritageRecovers objectscentral to India’scultural identity.ScholarshipAllows direct studyof original sourcesby Indian scholars.DiplomacyBuilds goodwill andstrengthens bilateralcultural ties.The Chola plates advance all three at once.Figure 4. Heritage, scholarship and diplomacy.Ministry of Culture; UNESCO.Digitally LearnCopyright (c) 2026. All Rights Reserved.

UPSC relevance and exam focus

Where this fits in the UPSC-CSE syllabus

This topic maps to General Studies Paper I: Indian art, culture and heritage, and ancient and medieval Indian history, with a link to cultural diplomacy in international relations.

For Prelims, hold the high-yield facts: the Chola dynasty and its kings, the copper-plate charter form, the languages of the plates, and the fact of the 2026 return from the Netherlands.

For Mains, two framings recur: the achievements of the Cholas in administration and culture, and the rationale and mechanisms for repatriating cultural antiquities.

Recurring linked concepts an aspirant should keep in working memory:

  • Chola administration: land grants, local self-government and revenue recorded in inscriptions.
  • Copper-plate charters: legal deeds of royal grants, a key epigraphic source.
  • Rajendra Chola I: known for naval expeditions, including the campaign against Srivijaya.
  • Antiquities repatriation: the return of cultural property under UNESCO frameworks.

The plates are inscribed in both Sanskrit and Tamil, not Tamil alone. Assuming a single language, or attributing the seal to the wrong Chola king, is a frequent error.

Do not reduce the Cholas to temple architecture alone. Their administrative records, like these plates, are equally central to their legacy.

Prelims MCQ practice

Each question below tests one specific concept on the topic. Click to reveal the answer and a full option-wise explanation.

Q1. Consider the following statements regarding the Chola copper plates returned in 2026:

  1. They were returned to India by the Netherlands during PM Modi's visit.
  2. They had been held at the University of Leiden.
  3. They date to the 11th century and belong to the Chola dynasty.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 and 2 only
  2. 2 and 3 only
  3. 1 and 3 only
  4. 1, 2 and 3
Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Explanation.

All three are correct. The Netherlands returned the plates during PM Modi's 2026 visit; they had been held at the University of Leiden; and they are an 11th-century Chola charter. Hence 1, 2 and 3.

Q2. With reference to the Anaimangalam (Larger Leiden) plates, consider the following:

  1. They are inscribed in both Sanskrit and Tamil.
  2. They are bound by a bronze ring bearing the seal of Rajendra Chola I.
  3. They record a grant to a Buddhist monastery at Nagapattinam.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

  1. 1 and 2 only
  2. 2 and 3 only
  3. 1 and 3 only
  4. 1, 2 and 3
Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Explanation.

All three are correct. The plates are bilingual (Sanskrit and Tamil), bound by a bronze ring with the seal of Rajendra Chola I, and record a grant to the Chudamani Vihara, a Buddhist monastery at Nagapattinam. Hence 1, 2 and 3.

Q3. Rajendra Chola I, whose seal authenticates the plates, is best known for which one of the following?

  1. Building the Sun Temple at Konark
  2. A naval expedition against the Srivijaya empire
  3. Founding the Vijayanagara empire
  4. Compiling the Sangam anthologies
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A naval expedition against the Srivijaya empire

Explanation.

Option (b) is correct. Rajendra Chola I is known for his naval expedition against the Srivijaya empire in Southeast Asia. Konark, Vijayanagara and the Sangam anthologies belong to other contexts. Hence option (b).

Q4. Copper-plate charters such as the Anaimangalam plates were primarily used in medieval India to:

  1. Record royal grants of land and revenue
  2. Serve as currency in long-distance trade
  3. Map coastal navigation routes
  4. List the ranks of the standing army
Show answer and explanation

Answer: Record royal grants of land and revenue

Explanation.

Option (a) is correct. Copper-plate charters were legal deeds recording royal grants of land and revenue, often to temples or monasteries. They were not currency, navigation maps or army rolls. Hence option (a).

Q5. The return of antiquities such as the Chola plates is promoted under the framework of which one of the following organisations?

  1. World Trade Organization
  2. UNESCO
  3. World Health Organization
  4. International Monetary Fund
Show answer and explanation

Answer: UNESCO

Explanation.

Option (b) is correct. UNESCO promotes the return of cultural property to countries of origin, including through its intergovernmental committee. The WTO, WHO and IMF deal with trade, health and finance respectively. Hence option (b).

Q6. Consider the following statements about the Cholas in light of the returned charter:

  1. The plates reflect a Hindu king's endowment to a Buddhist institution.
  2. The Tamil portion records the administrative detail of the grant.
  3. The Cholas left no written records of their administration.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 and 2 only
  2. 2 and 3 only
  3. 1 and 3 only
  4. 1, 2 and 3
Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1 and 2 only

Explanation.

Statements 1 and 2 are correct: a Hindu Chola king endowed a Buddhist monastery, and the Tamil portion carries the administrative detail. Statement 3 is wrong: the Cholas left extensive inscriptional records, including these plates. Hence 1 and 2 only.

Sources and Further Reading

Editorial Disclaimer

This article is compiled from the reference materials listed in the Sources section. It is an explainer for UPSC preparation and is not a substitute for primary documents (NCERTs, GoI ministry releases, IMD bulletins, RBI / CEA / MoEFCC publications, and Standing-Committee reports).